Aryan Futurism

To Infinity...and Beyond II

2008-01-10T03:39:00.000-08:00

Our race, culture and vision of limitless expansion in space and time has no future under the current global materialist status quo. Indeed, with inertia and the continuance of business-as-usual, the survival of the whole human race and other species is moot. If one day our descendants are reaching into inter-galactic space – then it is US that they will remember, and thank for our perseverance and loyalty to a higher order. It is US who are living at the critical junction in history, with unparalleled consequences for the Aryan race and the planet more generally. It is within our lifetimes that the fate of the planet for possibly millions of years will be decided.

We must view our destiny clearly. Whether we face a future amongst the stars, or final annihilation and extinction, the end of the experiment of advancing intellect and spirituality across the cosmos, is a decision for our current generation.

The urge towards further space exploration is an essential quality of the Aryan psyche, as recognized by Norman Lowell amongst others. It is fundamental to Aryan Futurist ideology; an ideology that will spread through successful propaganda.

Proto-Indo-European – Lingua Franca for the Imperium

2007-12-10T07:57:00.000-08:00

If Europe had witnessed at some stage during the last couple of centuries the unification of France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Romania and parts of Switzerland and Belgium, perhaps as the result of a successful campaign by Napoleon, then the interesting question arises: which language would the people of the new Mediterranean Imperium have chosen to communicate with each other?

Southern European lingua franca

My guess is that Latin would have soon overcome any rivals – notably French. It is from Latin that all the Romance languages evolved, so none of the participant nations of this hypothetical Napoleonic Imperium need feel slighted by having their language and culture ignored. All are off-spring of the Roman Empire. A stable empire demands a common language, but forcing French as a lingua franca onto the peoples of southern Europe would seem to serve the petty interests of French nationalism, rather than those of a Napoleonic Imperium aiming for centuries-long progress with stability. Additionally, Latin had been the language of the educated classes, of the natural sciences and humanities, throughout Europe for many centuries.

Literary tradition

With the advent of the IMPERIUM during the early 21st Century, a similar problem arises. Which language, out of the proud literary traditions of England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Scandinavia or Russia, will the peoples of Europe decide to use to talk to one another?

Once again, the answer is straightforward: Aryan, or Proto-Indo-European, to give it the polite, if cumbersome, moniker.

On the practicality of such a venture, extensive and plausible reconstructions of the original Aryan language were already available by the middle of the 19th Century, ironically a generation before the abortive liberal experiment of Esperanto. Instead of patching together some artificial language like an intellectual Meccano kit, how much better to take inspiration from the source of all the languages, nations and tribes of Europe: the source of not only our language but our culture, our metaphysics and the very stuff we are made of! All the major tribes and language-groups of Europe (Celts, Germanics, Balts, Slavs, Hellenics and Italics, as well as many beyond) are direct descendants of the Proto-Indo-European ur-speech, so no nation need complain of alienation: instead all will rejoice in their common brotherhood. Necessary new words arising from new technologies can be incorporated into common-language Aryan much as they are today, perhaps even maintaining the Greek/ Latin composite pattern.

Natural language for Europeans

Once a common Aryan language is taught in all our schools across Europe, in addition to the regional or national mother-tongue, we will see two immediate benefits.
The first is practical. For the first time in millennia, the people of Europe will be able to speak to each other with ease. We can expect a corresponding acceleration of our culture, science and economy.

The second advantage is more esoteric, yet more profound, especially for the individual mind. Studying the roots of our own language will give us a deeper understanding of ourselves, as a member of a nation, a tribe (Celtic, Germanic, Slavic etc.) and as part of a potentially eternal race and culture.

Language is deeply implicated in consciousness; our native tongue forms our perception at the same time as exterior reality informs and modifies our language. As well as revealing the deepest strata of the European weltanschauung, study of the original Aryan language will necessarily throw light on significant divergences between one's own native language and the pan-continental speech from which it evolved. For instance: the subsequent development of the future tense in Germanic languages by use of the verb “will”. Not only will Europeans better understand the metaphysical structure of our 10,000+ years of shared culture, as outlined in Georges Dumézil's trifunctional hypothesis, but also the particular viewpoint and contribution summarized in the idiosyncrasies of their own unique mother tongue.

The argument for the original Aryan language as the common language of the future pan-European IMPERIUM is powerful: it will bring to each individual a fuller appreciation through words of both their nation and their race and culture, and their station in the cosmos.

Psychological Aspects of the European Revolution

2007-11-26T09:39:00.000-08:00

Below is the transcript of the speech delivered by Kai Murros at the twelfth New Right Meeting in London on 3 November 2007. Kai Murros is one of the brightest, boldest and most articulate of the new generation of European New Right thinkers. As a young man, he is untainted by controversies of the past. His eyes are fixed firmly toward the future horizon. His writing is fresh, direct, and orientated toward action. Find more of his writing (as Aquilon) here.

The European Revolution will be above all else the Revolution of the Psyche
- and therefore it will be the most decisive event in our history.
It will release terrible destructive forces, but it will also lead us toward
healing, understanding and coming together.
We will re-define ourselves: Who we are, what we are made of, where do we
stand in this endless universe and what will be our destiny.
We will learn to understand how it affects us that we are an integral part
of our land, that our body is the creation of our soil and that this bond is
both mentally and physically absolutely vital.
We will learn to understand how our landscape - trees, sea shores,
mountains, meadows and villages shape our body and mind...
... and how the masses of poor hostile aliens, parasites, creatures of urban
jungle can never share this.
The white cliffs of Dover is not just beautiful rhetoric
- That sight, that landscape affects you physically through your emotions
and therefore those cliffs are part of you - physically.
We will learn that this kind of bond gives us certain rights and certain
duties.
We will learn to value our emotions - our love for our country and our
devotion for our people - because the relationship between the emotions and
the physical world is the same as the relationship between energy and
matter.
- Our emotions, more often than we care to admit, dictate our actions and
our actions shape the physical world around us.
The European Revolution will be a pantheistic revolution, because it
emphasizes the eternal cycle of nature and life.
The European Revolution emphasizes community rather than individual.
- It will be a powerful antidote against egoism, consumerism and
materialistic greed.
The European Revolution challenges the notion that man lives only to himself
and is separate from nature.
The European revolution aims at reinstating the natural order, which was
lost in the wake of the scientific and industrial revolution.
- Unlike Christianity, which is preoccupied with the salvation of the
individual soul and its eternal life after the physical death, we seek
immortality as members of our community, race, and as parts of the
ecosphere. Instead of waiting for rewards in the afterlife we value this
moment and this wondrous universe around us.
The European Revolution is also the revolution of the forbidden dark side of
our nature!!
For the naive liberals everything should always be nice and easy.
We however should see man as a whole, who is not complete without both
aspects of his personality - light and dark. And when the need arises we
must not hesitate to call upon the more complex side of our personality -
the dark undercurrent of the subconscious - our inner beast.
For decades we have been living in a fantasy world. The liberals have
declared that the beast is dead and our subconscious has been tamed -
reason, tolerance, materialism have prevailed and our past, our original
sin, has been exorcised. The cobwebs of violence, lust and hate have been
cleared away and light has entered where darkness once ruled.
But now as the liberal world is quickly deteriorating we can see that the
beast is very much alive after all. It has been only dormant for the past
sixty odd years, but it never went away, it never left us.
So far we have been told that if you are a decent person - study hard, work
hard, pay your taxes, obey the law - you will be rewarded for this. You will
get a decent job, a nice home and you'll be able to provide your family. You
will be respected for your efforts and you and your family will be protected
against crime and violence.
But things are rapidly changing - no matter how decent you are, no matter
how much you try you will not be rewarded:
- The rampant immigration turns the country that used to be yours unbearable
for you to live in - now you are the alien in your old neighbourhoods.
- You become the main target of the ethnic crime simply because you are
white.
- The police is unable and the courts unwilling to protect you.
- Those who sponge on the society ridicule you for you for your efforts.
- Habitual offenders prey on you.
- Politicians and media demand you to deny your identity.
- Your children are taught to hate themselves.
- The economic and social fabric of the society falls apart - the schools
rot and the Health Care System is in ruins.
- Year after year your life and the life of your family becomes economically
more and more precarious - you have to work harder to make ends meet and
still it is not enough.
- The future holds nothing good for you anymore, nothing to look forward to,
things are only going from bad to worse...
... you start having doubts ...
The pattern brakes, you are on your own.
- Slowly you start to get angry, but at first you don't realize it because
you are told by the system that you should be content.
- It is your own fault if you can't adapt to the changing world.
- Change is for the better - you should be happy.
- Feeling discontent equals disobedience.
- Only bad people do not welcome the change.
- In order to be good you must accept everything.
But you can't accept the change, because you can see that everything is
going wrong.
You struggle with your emotions - you want to be like the others, go with
the flow, believe in the lies and hope that maybe just maybe things will
work out in the end - at least for you...
... but you can't.
This conflict within makes you sick. You are constantly agitated, you feel
nauseous, weak and powerless, you have short of breath. It as if a heavy
weight was laid on your chest.
... Until one day you realize just how angry you are, but more than that,
you realize that you have every right to be angry.
- You accept your anger.
- The beast is awoken!!
Gradually you start working on your anger, you refine your anger - you
refine your anger into HATE! and now you are on your path to recovery - for
anger makes you weak but hate makes you strong!
Nowadays there is a lot of talk about hate crimes. There is an entire body
laws against hate crimes. Everybody seems to be worried about hate. Hate
appears to be the gravest problem of our time.
- But hate is good.
- Hate gives a structure to our life.
- Hate gives us a reason to exist, a focus, something to strive for, an
identity.
- Hate is energy, pure energy, provided by mother nature herself.
- Hate enables us to see through lies and pretense and helps us to
concentrate on the essential.
- Hate is democratic - even the rich and powerful cannot hate more than
their slaves and subjects - and soon hate may well be all that we have left.
- Hate emancipates - without hate for slavery you cannot break your shackles
and without hate for injustice there can be no justice.
- The greatest achievements of the human race have grown from hate and from
the ability control hate.
- Hate separates humans from animals. Animals do not hate but humans do.
Humans can hate for decades sometimes their entire life. We can even pass
hate on to our children and keep hate alive for centuries.
- Hate is a sign of an abstract intellect for only humans can hate people
they have never seen or met and only humans can hate concepts and processes.
- How can we know what love is if we refuse to recognize and understand
hate. Love and hate are the two opposite sides of the same coin - without
hate we are only halflings.
- In order to be complete we need hate.
- Only fools talk endlessly about love but forget the hate.
- Hate separates us from the meek and docile masses.
- Do not fear hate, do not deny or reject hate.
- Accept hate, embrace hate, learn to know it, learn to use it.
- Hate is your most powerful weapon, a hidden source of your strength. Do
not deny it from you.
- What the liberal elite fears most in this world is our ability to hate,
because our hate will one day be the most revolutionary force on the planet.
- Our hate will destroy and create empires.
The European Revolution is also a biological necessity, because it is the
call of the wild in us!
- Reason, tolerance and moderation step aside when the beast takes over.
- It is our animal side, our subconscious, that challenges our weak, kind,
liberal-minded and civilized super ego.
- The reptilian parts of our brains turn against the Cortex, the new comer
of the brain, the realm of sterile intellectual speculation and theoretical
non-sense.
- We need to be guided by our sexual urge, our territorial greed, our
violent impulse and excessive passions.
- For reason has lead us astray and intellect has betrayed us: they have
rendered us self-hating wimps and timid, spineless wind bags.
- Modern world has turned into a deadly trap to us and liberal humanism has
broken all its promises.
Very soon we will experience the hour of the wolf, the moment when our dark
side takes over, when the entire race is consumed with burning desire to
survive - at any cost, at any means. And then the next decades our dark side
will reign without constraint leading us from this dead end and eventually
saving us.
- The world thought we would be an easy prey but the reverse will happen and
we become the hunter.
- Now as the civilized, orderly, liberal world is falling into chaos and as
the organized society retreating in the face of mob violence and rampant
crime it is only natural that we also become what we truly are:
We are products of struggle!
Millions of years of merciless evolution has bestowed on us strength and
abilities that we have simply forgotten or denied their existence.
- The European Revolution will be a great process of healing as we come to
terms with all aspects of our personality - even accepting the dark side -
and as we finally start defending our honour and dignity and have the nerve
and the audacity to demand respect.
- We are proud of our achievements and we understand that we have the right
exist as who we are.
The European Revolution and the psychology of power.
The so called revolutionary left seems to be more interested in tearing
everything down rather than building anything new - let alone preserving
anything we have built so far.
For the radical leftists revolution seems to be a kind of orgiastic climax
of bad behaviour - children taking over the nursery, jumping up and down in
their beds and playing with food - and maybe even running into the drawing
room and knocking down the Ming vase.
For the radical leftists society is like an authoritarian father against
whom you constantly rebel - or in a more freudian sense, want to murder -
yet at the same time you always expect him to pay the bills.
We have to be so much more mature!!!
This continent, this civilization is our heritage and we must reclaim it
from those who have stolen it. We must take back what is rightfully ours and
then build it to the best of our abilities.
While the left spends all its time and energy breaking everything down and
alienating the ordinary people we must be the system builders - like the
ancient Romans - always willing to build our society, always prepared for
voluntary work and always perfecting our organization and methods.
While the radical left only makes demands on the society we must think what
we can contribute to our society.
While the radical left by its nature is deeply parasitical we will be its
exact opposite - a constructive national force.
Our enemies are lazy parasites, criminals and anti-socials. Through work,
organization and discipline we will be giants compared to them. We will
leave a mark on this world but they will disappear - and not even a memory
shall remain after them.
While the radical left only wants to shock and aggravate the ordinary tax
payers and law abiding citizens we must constantly think how to seduce the
mind of the masses, how to appeal to the man of the street, how to respond
to his psychological needs, how to use his fears and dreams to allure him to
us.
- Because there is one element the radical left always manages to ignore, a
factor in a political struggle, which is absolutely vital if you really want
to change the world.
-- This element is power!
In their childish tantrums the radical left always fails to recognize the
importance of power.
- We however, have to make power the corner stone of everything we do
- The Germans have the expression "Wille zur Macht" - the will to power or
lust for power.
- We must have the will to power, we must lust for power.
- Every waking hour we must think how to get the power and to use it.
- We must be consumed with desire for power.
- Only fools think that you can change the world without power.
- Only wimps and losers think that it is wrong to have power over others.
- And only naive simpletons who know nothing of this world believe that you
can smash the power, destroy it, make it go away, create a world without
power.
- Where there are people there is power - political, economic, religious,
social, sexual power - then it is just a matter of choice whether you want
to rule or be ruled.
- We must accept this fundamental truth that power is everything and that we
must be prepared to do everything to get it.
- We must make ourselves attractive to power.
- We must constantly think of power, we must constantly talk about power.
- We must make everybody understand that all we do, say or think is about
power.
- We must make everybody understand that our movement is about power,
absolute power, power with no bounds.
- And we must make everybody aware that we already know that we will get the
power - for we have the will, the means ... and time is on our side.
- Why should we do this?
- Firstly, the more you want something the better are your chances of
getting it. The first step in getting anything is wanting it, believing that
you get it, visualizing that you get it.
Through exercises of positive affirmation we become stronger, more
convincing - to ourselves and to people around us - and we increase the odds
of achieving our goals.
- Secondly, we must mesmerize our enemies like the snake paralyzes its prey
with fear before the strike.
Our liberal enemies are already feeling the pinch. They are not quite so
certain anymore that their ideal world would come after all... their doubt
grows year after year.
While the liberals are gradually losing their faith our absolute certainty
that we will take over the society tells the liberals that we know something
they don't - and this makes them nervous.
The liberals are already in defense and defense always eventually leads into
defeat.
The Revolution of Self-Discipline:
The Left is always very busy advocating lofty ideals - human rights, civil
rights, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of expression - the
list goes on. But when you take a closer look at the Left - especially the
radical left - these words get a very different meaning.
The leftist concept of freedom means freedom to sponge on the society,
freedom to terrorize the public to express your precious political views,
freedom to intimidate people who don't share your values, freedom to break
the law if you feel like it, freedom to steal if it fits your own personal
code of ethics ... and in general ... freedom to behave like a total brat.
We can safely say that the most influential and destructive philosophical
innovation the modern left had for the western societies was the idea that
no one is ever accountable for one's actions.
- Just think how the leftist thugs and trotskyite punks defend themselves
after they have burned cars, looted stores and vandalized property
- Or think how the leftist university intellectuals defend them.
- Whatever these bums have done they are never guilty of anything - it is
always somebody else.
It is not the punks carrying Molotov's cocktails who burn cars - by some
twisted logic we should actually blame the police.
When shop windows are smashed you shouldn't blame the rock throwing
Trotskyites but the system that forces them to do so.
When you see public places being vandalized, remember that vandalism is
simply a justified reaction of our young people against racism and
oppression.
Philosophically the left states that man is simply a product of the society
and therefore we should always blame the society for everything and not to
expect the individual to control his behaviour in any way.
- In the eyes of the modern left self-discipline equals fascism.
This attitude makes sense when we remember that already the "heroic"
revolutionary struggle of the young radical leftists in the 60's was only a
childish tantrum of the most pampered and spoiled generation this planet had
so far seen.
It was easy to play revolution here in the affluent west, to challenge and
defy the "system" which was a democratic, well meaning, welfare society, to
demand freedom when you already were free.
- And still for decades we have been forced to listen to the self-praise of
the 1968 generation for their heroic achievements - especially how they
liberated us from the stuffy reactionary values of the past.
The message of the infantile revolution of the 60's nevertheless is that bad
behaviour is revolutionary activism.
It has become painfully obvious that modern leftism is simply a form of
regression to a childlike state of irresponsibility and low impulse control.
Since we live in societies where leftist values are predominant the ultimate
form of rebellion is SELF DISCIPLINE.
The European youth will realize that the best way to defy this repugnant,
decaying system is by exercising strict self-discipline and by displaying
strength of character and sense of duty.
The generations that will reach adulthood in the coming decades have the
freedom of choice and to the amazement of the society this is what they will
choose.
The European Revolution will be the revolution of the Will and
Self-Discipline. - It will be a rite of passage into adulthood for our young
people.
For the European Youth this revolution means:
a) Taking charge
b) Carrying the responsibility
- no more hiding behind anyone's back, no more excuses.
c) Making demands on oneself
d) Growing up through sacrifice
e) Becoming wise and strong through work and struggle
The European Revolution means being relentless, unyielding and proud!
The European Revolution will be more than anything else a deeply
psychological revolution. It will reform us so that we can once again be
mature adults... ... fit to rule the world.

A Clueless Projection

2007-11-19T12:20:00.000-08:00

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband last week gave a supremely arrogant outline of what the “New Class” - the small-minded deracinated bureaucrats imposed on the defeated peoples of Europe after WW2 – have in store for our great continent.

Miliband delivered his speech at the College of Europe in Bruges, Belgium, where Margaret Thatcher gave her famous anti-federalist speech nineteen years ago.

The present Foreign Secretary, like the former Europe Minister Denis MacShane and indeed all of the corrupt present administration, advocates maintaining the delusion of business-as-usual. They all fail to understand that the future will not be like the past, in particular the past sixty years of liberal capitalist hegemony.

Master Miliband trots out the usual dubious liberal ideals for our consideration: free trade, tackling extremism, “championing international law and human rights in and outside Europe” and above all creating “a multilateral free-trade zone around our periphery” which would be “a version of the European Free Trade Association that could gradually bring the countries of the Mahgreb, the Middle East and Eastern Europe in line with the single market, not as an alternative to membership, but potentially as a step towards it.”

The plutocratic gangsters at the top of our society are so smug and insulated that they can't hear the crashing of the papier-mâché pillars of international finance collapsing around them. They have also blocked their ears to the objections of the vast majority of ordinary Europeans who have no desire to share economic and political union with Turkey, Algeria and Israel.

Miliband makes a concessionary nod to environmental concerns without acknowledging that man-made climate change spells doom for endless economic growth and wasteful consumer capitalism. He, like all the indentikit multicult “New Class” administrators, is wilfully blind to the voracious black hole at the core of current international solvency crisis. However much the financial wizards attempt to fill the yawning gap; with structured investment vehicles, interest rate cuts, or cheaper crude oil, their attempts will be futile. There is a spiritual and moral void at the heart of liberal humanism, not just in the international credit markets. The crisis that international capitalism faces now is above all a metaphysical and existential crisis; a crisis of confidence that extends beyond the mere matter of the functionality or efficiency of global free trade, to the sustainability and indeed desirability of “the war of all against all”, and additionally the war of all against the planet.

No crime would be too lunatic or heinous for the “New Class” to commit, as their policy for European race-replacement already shows. They may have secret plans for de-population, or simply beat a future retreat as a super-rich elite to the still-barely-habital regions of the globe, most likely the poles as forecast by Lovelock or evoked in Lovecraft's dystopian epics.

Global warming, the limits of thoughtless, greedy consumption and above all the growing realization by Europeans of their true spiritual and cultural roots and heritage will dictate that the IMPERIUM – an autarkic Europe with Siberia – is the only solution for our continent and our people.

Miliband's background (from Wikipedia):

Born in London, living at 5, Edis Street, London, NW1, David Miliband is the elder son of Polish-born Marion Kozak and the late Belgian-born Marxist theoretician Ralph Miliband.
Both David's paternal grandparents lived in the Jewish quarter of Warsaw, before his grandfather, Samuel "Sam" Miliband, joined the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet War. Samuel, then Shimon, fought under the command of Trotsky, 'eliminating'(murdering) white Russians, Ukranians and Poles opposed to Communism.[2] Adolphe (Ralph) Miliband was born in Brussels on 7 January, 1924, his Polish parents having fled economic depression in Warsaw. Hitler’s invasion of Belgium in May 1940 as part of the Nazis’ Western Offensive split the Miliband family in half: Ralph and father Samuel fled to England, while Ralph’s mother Renée and baby sister Nan stayed behind for the duration of the war. They were not reunited until 1950.[3]
David's younger brother, the economist Ed Miliband, is the Member of Parliament for Doncaster North and the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, making the brothers the first siblings to serve together in Cabinet since Edward, Lord Stanley and his brother Oliver in 1938.

Wikipedia: David Miliband
BBC report of Miliband's Bruges Speech

Being British

2007-10-24T04:47:00.000-07:00

In a desperate rear-guard action, assorted liberal multiracists including British premier Gordon Brown have been trying to define what it means to be “British”. As the enormity of their betrayal against their own race and culture becomes increasing evident in our cities, towns, and countryside, the promoters of this divisive society are flailing around like drowning donkeys struggling to reach the elusive lifeboat called “unity”. For them, no such lifeboat exists.

They hope that the mutually-antagonistic communities of Britain will rally around such vague concepts as “liberty”, “democracy”, “tolerance” or the “rule of law”. Firstly, these liberal ideals are hardly unique to the British, especially since the British did a pretty good job in imposing these values across the rest of the planet. Revolutionary French and Americans of the Enlightenment have equal claim to having formulated these values, and nearly every country in the world today at least pays lip-service to the same. The October 2007 issue of Prospect magazine perfectly illustrates the depths of their dilemma (the historian Robert Colls being one of the few intellectual commentators to cut through the waffle).

Secondly, not all of Britain's exclusive communities can subscribe to this liberal framework, in particular devout Muslims. Any law devised by man, as opposed to Allah, is quite literally anathema to these fundamentalists.

Thirdly, and perhaps most devastatingly, such ideas as “liberty”, “democracy” and “tolerance” are not so much values to aim for, as processes. They can never be ends-in-themselves. Liberty is meaningless by itself; one must have a desired outcome in order to exercise liberty. A person can be free to pursue (or avoid) a certain objective. The objective has value, not the method of reaching that value. The same with liberal democracy; democracy is a process, it is not a finality because negotiation is endless and can be changed at any time. Witness the amendments to the American constitution. If these values of liberty and equality are achieved (and they have already been achieved on numerous occasions, from Ancient Athens to the English Commonwealth, to the collapse of the Berlin Wall) then we are still back at square one, with separate groups glaring at each other across an unbridgeable chasm.

“Tolerance” is yet another meaningless value. Few Britons would endorse tolerance for serial killers, rapists or pedophiles. Tolerance has its limits, like democracy it is endlessly negotiable, hence not a value at all, least of all a principle that a nation can rally around. For a Muslim, homosexuality can never be tolerated and it is a requirement of their faith that homosexuals be annihilated, whereas a secular Englishman may beg to differ. There can be no final compromise between these two entirely opposing positions. For the moment, the “tolerant” consensus in Britain is that homosexuals should not be crushed under stone walls, or pushed over cliffs. Who knows what the “tolerant” position will be in the year 2051, when the non-white (mainly fundamentalist Christian and Muslim) population is expected to reach almost 30 per cent?

Fourthly, for all their bleating about “equality”, we all know that the only kind of equality that matters in a capitalist society is economic equality. A person can pretty much do what they like, so long as they have the funds to do it in private. And if they are caught, then all they need is more dosh to hire a good lawyer. In Britain, as in all the other countries that have followed the “Anglo-Saxon” economic model, the gap between the rich and poor is increasing. The rich can afford to trample any commonly-held values underfoot. Look at such people as Michael Jackson, O.J. Simpson or Robert Maxwell...and they're just some of the ones we know about.

So what is the alternative to the bankrupt liberal conception of “Britishness”? For European Identitarians and the New Right, the answer is straightforward: Britishness is an inseparable mix of one's race and culture. It is a description of what one IS, not some abstract concept to which we should all aim.

Race

For decades liberal multiracists, Cultural Marxists and the rest have maintained the fiction that the Britain is a “nation of immigrants” and that we are a mongrel race. The truth is the opposite; we are one of the most racially-homogeneous nations on earth. Multiculturalists like to point out that Britain has been invaded on numerous occasions, by the Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norwegians, Normans, who originated in Scandinavia, but they fail to mention that all these different peoples shared on thing in common; they were all of the same race, i.e. Aryan, or, if you prefer, Indo-European. Some of them, for instance the Anglo-Saxons and Danes, even came from the same location, just at different times separated by a few centuries. It is impossible to distinguish between Anglo-Saxon and Dane DNA. Between 1066 and 1947 Britain experienced just two significant (50,000+) waves of immigration: continental Huguenots, who were the same race and largely possessed the same culture as the British, and the Jews, expelled by Edward I and re-admitted by Cromwell.

Culture

Given Britain's history of invasion by her immediate continental neighbours, it is impossible to isolate British culture from wider European developments, but we can perhaps discern certain traits in this wider European culture that became especially emphasised on our own island.

Soon after the retreat of glaciers covering Britain at the end of the last Ice Age, the first colonizers arrived from the continental European Atlantic seaboard and became incorporated into western European Megalithic culture, culminating in the late-Neolithic achievements of Stonehenge, Avebury and Silbury Hill. This pre-historic culture was unified across central and western Europe in that it shared the same astronomical worldview-religion and units of measurement. It was superseded by the bronze age pan-European Celtic cultures of Hallstatt and La Tène, the first cultures in Britain that we can definitively categorize as Aryan, then the Romans (the Aryan solar empire par excellence) and finally by other folk from north-western Europe. Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss (1892-1974) makes some interesting observations about how landscape influenced the cultural outlook of these latter colonizers:

“the gray-green North Sea has long-drawn-out, mile long, high waves, whereas the bluer Kattegat thunders with waves of shorter length. Here everything seems to become closer and narrower, everywhere we see the shores or sense their existence, and even beyond the Öresund and the 'open' Baltic Sea we never again fully get that feeling of limitless expanse, infinite distance, we never again get that compelling feeling of power which the North Sea gives...The land of the North Sea is characterized by distance and movement; over broad stretches it is integrated into the depths of space.”

“The Nordic soul experiences its world as a structure made up of countless thoroughfares – those already at hand and those still to be created – on land, on water, in the air, and into the stratosphere. It races like a fever through all segments of the Nordic community, a fever of speed which, infectiously, reaches out far beyond the world of the north...”

Historically, Britain has allowed women a more active role in culture and politics than our continental cousins; I would argue that this is a legacy from Celtic civilization where women held an honoured status in the political hierarchy, as evidenced by continental chariot-burials, or the Oera Linda Book. It is one instance of insular cultural conservatism that has served the British well; one need only think of Boudica, Eleanor of Aquitaine, Elizabeth I, Victoria and even Margaret Thatcher.

Inventiveness

British culture is also distinguished by its innovation and exploration: a trait it naturally shares with the wider Aryan culture but which became especially concentrated on this island. I suspect that this “Nordic style of reaching out, in its ultimate and boldest intensification” (Clauss) is a characteristic we inherited from our sea-faring ancestors. It is the same impulse that led from the expansion of the original rune-row to Tim Berners-Lee. Famously, Britain was the first nation to industrialize, and the first to produce science-fiction with Mary Shelley and H.G. Wells.

The British are also famous for being practical and pragmatic, unlike, say, the Germans who are prone to adventurously over-extend themselves at any given time (“In the last analysis it will recognize only the limits of the possible as its own limits. It may even happen that at this point it will fall ill and will try to ignore all limitations – a characteristically Nordic illness” - Clauss). This practicality is at its best and most successful when it is made to serve the dynamic process of synthesizing. It is at its worst, and most destructive, when it attempts to control and dominate the indigestible products of other, non-European cultures. The resulting incoherent mess benefits neither the target alien civilization, nor the British.

Despite the deathly, flattening corruption of the liberal consensus, the British sense of intellectual precocity has carried on into the late Twentieth Century, often directly from the street with the proliferation of until then unimaginable youth cults, music and fashion.

The British are nonetheless skilled at containing their imaginative energy. This is practicality at its best, as mentioned earlier. Beverley Grammar School in Yorkshire was founded around the year 700. A century or more later, Alfred the Great was encouraging all his subjects to read and write, to study and learn. As a result, we produced some of the greatest literature in the world. It was the British aptitude for contained exuberance that disciplined rowdy games between villages into the world-conquering sports we know today.

Britain's Malign Influence

There is one aspect of cultural development of which the British have no reason to be proud, although ironically it is the one development of which the liberals, Blair and Brown, Cultural Marxists and other multiracists are most proud: the deeply-flawed notion of liberalism and “Human Rights”. Although this sickly transplant from the Middle East did not originate on our land, we can be rightly blamed for nurturing it and allowing it to spread across the globe like some monstrous triffid.

When Henry VIII broke from the Roman Catholic Church in 1534, he was selfishly motivated by lust, greed and stupidity. His lack of foresight led directly to the most extreme forms of Christian Protestantism, with its spurious notions of a “priesthood of all believers” infiltrating English and Scottish minds. That Britain had been Christian for a millennium was a serious enough problem, although in mitigation late medieval Roman Catholicism had been profoundly Europeanized and paganized. After the Protestant Reformation, Christianity was stripped of this European cultural influence and returned to its pristine, alien, Judaic kernel. The Bible became the sole truth and law, and most of the Bible was comprised of the books of the Old Testament; all of it was written by Jews. It was this dismal process that was accelerated with the advent of Puritanism and culminated with Oliver Cromwell's brutal, and profoundly anti-British dictatorship. It was pared-down Protestantism that provided a deformed, if significant, root for the Enlightenment and its political expression in liberal individualism. Hence the excesses of the American and French revolutions, the first global plutocracy in the form of the British Empire, and the dire spiritual and environmental crisis we find ourselves in today, so ably outlined by Alain de Benoist and Tomislav Sunic amongst others.

Our Identity and Destiny

So, in answer to Brown's abstract, universalist and ultimately unrealizable definition of what it means to be British, we True Brits can propose a definition which is solid, testable and leave no room for ambiguity. To be British is to be a part of the north-west European racial stock and to inherit a culture which is firmly based on the Aryan weltanschauung, both practical yet also supremely progressive and inventive.

All Aryan culture is innovative, the thesis-antithesis-synthesis method of development is explicitly written into our earliest myths. Energy and inanimate matter, fire and ice, reacts to create the giants, who in turn create the gods; a tri-partite sequence of conflict and resolution on a higher plane of existence, or a greater degree of complexity. The British have exemplified this quintessential process, albeit until now unconsciously. To remain British means to advance this process, not to stand still. We can only do so by ridding ourselves of the static dualistic alien worldview which was first introduced into Britain during the late Classical era, and was re-introduced with magnified intensity and virulence at the beginning of the Modern era with the Reformation. Then, once again, England will be merrie and Scotland will be bonnie; it will be an intensification of the culture we developed during the High Middle Ages, on a higher level.

In the words of Clauss, “After the surface of the globe had been traversed so far and wide that there were now only a few small unknown spots left on the map – when there was no longer any new land left to discover – the Nordic craving for the faraway found other outlets. If there was no new region to be found, the Nordic took the whole global space more firmly into his grasp. The enveloping of the earth took the place of discovery. Here the craving for speed, which we mentioned earlier, finds its real meaning; it is the urge to grasp the entire world with one grip. All the same, the spiritual homeland, in accordance with the style of Nordic man, will always be – and can only be – the north.”

Nobel Winner Nobbled

2007-10-17T16:32:00.000-07:00

News from The Telegraph on the slow death of scientific objectivity.

Meanwhile, at the Science Museum itself - no pasty faces!

To Infinity...and Beyond

2007-10-06T04:57:00.000-07:00

Britain's dour new premier Gordon Brown is being urged by his own government scientific advisers to increase Britain's commitment to space exploration.
BBC Newsnight

This excerpt from Perry Rhodan #4 INVASION FROM SPACE neatly sums up the economic argument:

The President of the Asiatic Federation leaned forward. “What project are you referring to?” he inquired eagerly.
Perry Rhodan smiled. “A space fleet. Our planet must have a space fleet!”
“What for?”
“There are many reasons, Mr. President. One of these is purely economic. It is no longer a secret that war and rearmament used to be part of the economic welfare of a state. This may sound rather cynical, but is nevertheless a sober fact. We must therefore proceed according to this well proved principle. With this exception, though – our efforts will no more serve to manufacture arms for war, but we will have a new goal, to build a space fleet. This will bring about an economic boom for all nations on Earth. New industries will arise, every able person will find work. We will stamp factories and huge industrial enterprises out of the ground. We will find new methods of producing new materials and manufacturing thus far unknown machines.
“I have spoken about the purely economic aspect and the tremendous advantages for all of mankind. But there is also a military reason for having a space fleet.”

Homo Americanus

2007-10-03T03:58:00.000-07:00

HOMO AMERICANUS: Child of the Postmodern Age. Tomislav Sunic, Foreword by Professor Kevin MacDonald (2007)

Rather than present a general review of Tomislav Sunic's important new book about the foundational myths of the United States, which has already been commendably reviewed by Troy Southgate in NEW IMPERIUM #4, Dr Fredrick Toben, Paul Gottfried, Peter Rushmore and others (Amazon UK,Amazon USA), I will concentrate on just one observation from the book which is largely unknown to the European man in the street, if not European Identitarians. This observation is the parallels between the aftermath of the American Civil War (1861-1865) and the American subjugation of western Europe after World War Two.

Southern Agrarians

In 1930, a group of American Traditionalist writers and poets called the Southern Agrarians published their manifesto I'LL TAKE MY STAND, in response to post-Civil War Yankee domination. In this tract, one of their number, Frank Lawrence Owsley, stated in his essay 'The Irrepressible Conflict': “The rising generation read Northern literature, shot through with the New England tradition. Northern textbooks were used in Southern schools; Northern histories, despite the frantic protest of local patriotic organizations, were almost universally taught in Southern high schools and colleges...”

This behaviour of the anti-Traditionalist Northern Yankees can be seen as a precursor to American political and economic suppression of Europe following World War Two, as Tom Sunic writes, “notably when the American educators introduced into European places of higher learning the curricula consisting of Puritan derived hypermoralism, mixed with atheistic Catholic-bashing Freudo-Marxian scholasticism, and carried out by Frankfurt School theoreticians”. It is the same warped ideology that still rules academia on both sides of the Atlantic today.

By exposing the alien Judeo-Christian/ Puritanical roots of the United States, and their continuing infestation into all parts of the globe, Sunic has done a great service to European Identitarians.

Burnt Offerings

2007-09-23T00:32:00.000-07:00

Predictably and disappointingly, the deluded Marxist multiculturalists of Act-Up Paris have been demonstrating against France's latest attempts to secure her borders. I am by no means a supporter of French President Sarkozy's NeoCon regime, but any effort, however belated, that gives France a fighting chance of still being France fifty years from now is worth commending. Not for Act-Up, however.

In his dubious polemic WITCHCRAFT AND THE GAY COUNTERCULTURE (1978), Arthur Evans states in Chapter 1: Joan of Arc: Transvestite and Heretic:

The history of the word “faggot” reveals the intimate connection between Gay [sic] men, heresy and witchcraft. Both witches and heretics were regularly burned on bundles of sticks called “faggots”. In the popular speech of the time expressions popped up like “fire and faggot” or “to fry a faggot”, suggesting that the victims themselves were called “faggots”.

The homosexuals in Act-Up cannot understand that by encouraging Third World immigration into Europe, they are exacerbating an already volatile situation. They are concurring with the combustible policy of race-and-culture replacement in Europe. They are adding more fuel, and faggots, to the fire. They are doing their best to ensure that the foundations of our civilization, and their own existence, will be incinerated. From being the victims of a medieval holocaust, homosexuals in Act-up have become gleeful participants in a future inflammation and conflagration.

During the Middle Ages it was murderous monotheists who thrust homosexuals into the heart of the inferno. Today its is Act-Up homosexuals who are busy building a new bonfire; a bonfire that will become their pyre as surely as a fairy sits atop a Christmas Tree.

By their actions, Act-Up powerfully demonstrate that they are the enemies of European peoples and cultures in general, and European homosexuals in particular.
Washington Times 20.09.07

Euro New Right & Sexual Morality

2007-09-19T07:34:00.000-07:00

The ENR’s “paganism” entails a naturalism towards mores and sexuality. Unlike still traditionalists, ENR members have a relatively liberated attitude towards sexuality. Thus [Alain de] Benoist had no qualms about giving an interview to Gaie France, which features homoerotic images as well as cultural commentary. ENR members have no desire to impose what they consider the patently unnatural moralism of Judeo-Christianity on sexual relations. However, while relatively more tolerant in principle, they still value strong family life, fecundity, and marriage or relations within one’s own ethnic group. (Their objection to intra-ethnic liaisons would be that the mixture of ethnic groups diminishes a sense of identity. In a world where every marriage was mixed, cultural identity would disappear). They also criticize Anglo-American moralism and its apparent hypocrisy: “ . . . a video depicting a man and woman having sexual intercourse . . . is liable to confiscation by the [British] state. One graphically depicting teenage girls being disembowelled by razor blades affixed to the fingers of a repulsive ghoul, by contrast, tops the rental figures quite lawfully across the land, goes into tour editions, each more disgusting and genuinely obscene than the last, and is not indeed the most unpleasant revelling in blood and gore to sit lawfully on the video shops’ shelves.”[The Scorpion, No. 13: Winter 1989-90, p. 52.] In this, they are closer to a worldly Europe than to a puritanical America obsessed with violence. According to the ENR: “Our ancestral Indo-European culture . . . seems to have enjoyed a healthy natural attitude to processes and parts of the body concerned with the bringing forth of new life, the celebration of pair-bonding love, and the perpetuation of the race.”[The Scorpion, No. 13: Winter 1989-90, p. 51.]

In its desire to create a balanced psychology of sexual relations, the ENR seeks to overcome the liabilities of conventional conservative thought: the perception of conservatives as joyless prudes, and the seemingly ridiculous psychology implied in conventional Christianity. It seeks to address “flesh-and-blood men and women,” not saints. Since some of the Left’s greatest gains in the last few decades have been made as a result of their championing sexual freedom and liberation, the ENR seeks to offer its own counter-ethic of sexual joy. The hope is presumably to nourish persons of the type who can, in Nietzsche’s phrase, “make love alter reading Hegel.” This is also related to the desire for the reconciliation of the intellectual and warrior in one person: the reconciliation of vita contemplative and vita activa.

This naturalism leads the ENR to re-evaluate “the feminine” and reject what it sees as Christianity’s denigration of women. The ENR has begun developing a counter-ethic of feminism which, while respecting women and “the feminine,” rejects the US ideologization of gender by politically-correct feminism. These ideas promise to overcome the poisoned atmosphere of sexual relations and the neopuritanism of radical feminism. “In pre-Christian Europe, amongst the Celts and the Norse for example, women, without in any way renouncing their femininity or seeking to be ersatz men, enjoyed essentially equal rights.”[The Scorpion, No. 13: Winter 1989-90, p. 51.]
Mark Wegiersky
http://www.new-right.org/?p=48#more-48

Report: New Right 11th London Meeting

2007-09-10T01:09:00.000-07:00

First up was Mr Christopher Chibnall with a fascinating anecdotal talk on the artist and magician Austin Osman Spare, billed as the first postmodern occultist. When I worked at Watkin's occult bookshop off the Charing Cross Road, we kept our Osman Spare in a lock-up glass bookshelf in the basement. Mainly because of their value, but partly also for their content (not that we'd get many kids in the basement, which was devoted mainly to books about Advaita Vedanta Hinduism; kids naturally preferred gawking at the crystals, jewellery, statues and other New Age trinkets on sale upstairs). I'd like to thank Mr Chibnall for elucidating the ideas of this singular individual, who was a fellow south Londoner and instigator of his own Chaos Magic. Mr Chibnall is working on a book about Austin Osman Spare, although I'm surprised that he hasn't already been beaten to it by Peter Ackroyd; this mixture of London, the occult, raw sexuality and consciousness is quintessential Ackroyd territory.

Next up came Norman Lowell from the highly successful IMPERIUM EUROPA movement in Malta. At his last talk at a London New Right meeting a couple of years ago Mr Lowell outlined the spiritual and practical delineations of the coming Imperium; this time he introduced a new element to his thinking, namely Dominion. Just as, like Evola, Lowell associates the ideas of a Solar/Polar Imperium with Masculinity, so Dominion (from Latin “domus” - “home”) is associated with the regional and local, that is, the Feminine, nurturing principle. This concept adds a whole new dimension to the idea of Imperium. As I listened to Mr Lowell I was struck by the thought that I could be hearing for the first time an idea as profound, significant and influential as that proposed by Nietzsche in THE BIRTH OF TRAGEDY. Mr Lowell has a new book out, aptly titled IMPERIUM EUROPA, this Winter 2007. It's worth putting an order in now because his last book, CREDO, is now a sought-after item, with people emailing to ask me where they can get a copy. Mr Lowell also expanded on his exciting idea of reserving a special space in Russia for eugenic progress, and stressed the importance of Aryan solidarity and the avoidance of fratricidal wars.

Following Mr Lowell came Mr Jonathan Bowden. I always strongly look forward to Mr Bowden's talks; he outlines often complex ideas with astounding lucidity and precision, introducing new facts and new ideas from sometimes obscure thinkers with great flourish. Mr. Bowden surveyed a wide panorama, from the power of intellect, to the commercial elite ruling over us and the insidious culture of victimology. Gay activists in particular have much to learn from his arguments against special pleading. Since I am not a member of the BNP, I am hardly in a position to comment on Mr Bowden's recent run-in with the BNP leadership, save to say that in my opinion the party has lost an immensely accomplished and invigorating speaker.

Finally, from Croatia, Mr Tomislav Sunic, to elaborate on some of his ideas presented in his excellent new book HOMO AMERICANUS: Child of the Postmodern Age. I finished reading this important book about America's foundational myths and their reverberations into the present just last week, and hope to do it some justice by giving it a proper review on this (Aryan Futurism) blog in the near future. As well as discussing the heroic Prince Eugene, the self-censoring society and martyrology, Mr Sunic urged his listeners to look behind the human rights rhetoric of our democratic leaders, and suggested that a read of a country's penal codes could be far more revealing.

As ever, the meeting was at a superb location in central London with a lively, positive, friendly audience – the largest I've seen at a New Right meeting to date. Between speakers, the crowd was abuzz with subjects ranging from the ongoing credit-crunch financial crisis (hardly surprising, given our location in the heart of the Leviathan) to Michael Wood's current colourful documentary series on BBC2 TV about the history of India, which certainly seems to be a hit with European Identitarians. Troy Southgate, Jonathan Bowden, Jonothon Boulter and all the other organizers and helpers at the London New Right meetings deserve praise for opening up this immensely important new intellectual space, the suitably impressive London salon and ante-chamber for the IMPERIUM, and congratulations for enabling this new space to expand, all the while winning fresh support and acclaim. It is a tremendous undertaking triumphantly fulfilled.

Moscow Conference: Kai Murros' Speech

2007-09-01T02:08:00.000-07:00

Below is the speech that Finnish visionary and European nationalist Kai Murros gave at the conference “Europe and Russia: New Perspectives” (http://ateney.ru/eng/eng021.htm#c) in Moscow on June 11, 2007. Kai Murros is one of the most important thinkers of the New Right in Europe. His ideas are some of the most radical and original in the movement. His creation, the nationalist sage Aquilon, deserves special attention. We should all familiarize ourselves with the quotations by Aquilon:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/quotes1.htm
These quotations are truly an inspiration for the ages.
HAIL Murros! HAIL the New Dawn of a truly socialist and racialist European empire!
Constantin von Hoffmeister

EURO-RUSSIA: PRESENT AND FUTURE
by Kai Murros

Military Cooperation between Western Europe and Russia

It is easy to talk about cooperation but what would be concrete measures we should take?
What is the most URGENT danger Europe is facing ??

- The massive pressure against Russia’s borders !!!
- The forgotten ethnic war in the east !!!!!

Russia needs help:
- Russia’s border is the longest in the world.
- Russia’s border is a land border infiltration is easier.
- Border areas are already populated by non-Russians, which is why it is easier for infiltrators to get over and and blend in.
- Larger and larger areas are in danger of becoming base areas for further infiltration. These areas can very soon be DE FACTO beyond the control of the Russian state. The presence of the state in these areas can sooner than we think be only a facade while the actual power is in the hands of ethnic mafia and family/clan networks.

At first the mushrooming infiltrator communities will be considered as “part of the system” since they do not openly declare that they want to break away - until the day comes when there is no system left.

Russia’s unique problems: Vast land, difficult terrain, no natural barriers, reliable population only a thin cover - especially in the periphery > guerrilla like infiltration is easy.

The most successful invasions to Europe have always come from the east!!!

Our/Russia’s worst problem:
1) Dwindling demographics
2) Biggest population explosion in human history taking place in the muslim world and China.
3) Economical and environmental pressure forces people to abandon their homes
> Pull and push effect against our borders.
The situation is very much as the same as in the ancient Rome when the borders experienced a prolonged demographic pressure from the periphery.
A psychological problem:
To fight back the infiltrating masses is a war of wills.

Two factors struggle:
1) Our will to ward off the avalanche of the infiltrators and our preparedness to use what ever means necessary to achieve this goal.
2) The desperate determination of the poor masses to find a new home and a better life at any cost.

Bottom line is this:
The poor masses are coming anyway no matter how we turn them away at the border, they will always find a crack in the fence - therefore we must be emotionally and morally prepared to physically deal with the infiltrator communities and the infiltrating population.
Our greatest enemy is our humane benevolence and compassion since they render us defenceless at the face of rapacious desperate masses.
Special problem: Expulsion or even harsher methods of dealing with the infiltrating populations will undoubtedly lead in to reprisals by the governments whose citizens we are facing at our borders. We may assume that the harder the struggle becomes and the harder our measures get the harder the reprisals will get as well. We have to accept that defending our/Russia’s border will undoubtedly make us very unpopular.

Western Europe’s advantage
Densely populated > immigrants cannot hide behind great distances and difficult terrain.
Densely populated > overcrowding becomes acute more quickly.
The decline of Europe’s indigenous population is not quite as steep as Russia’s - yet.
Europe’s sea borders are easier to defend - once there is the will to do so.

What does Russia need then in her struggle, what can Europe give her?
Men?
Steel?
Fortifications?
Will?
As I already pointed out our and Russia’s greatest problem is the declining demographics.

European population was expanding ever since the black death. Since late 14.th century European population grew the same rate as the masses in the developing world today. European surplus population colonized the large parts of the planet and provided the labour for the industrial revolution.

But above all else the ever growing population was the raw material that was needed for the endless wars in Europe. Without population growth the large scale wars would have been impossible.

Just imagine how quickly after the WWI Europe was demographically ready for the WWII and how quickly the massive population losses of the WWII disappeared as the birth rate sored right after the war.

But now everything has changed - we are in decline and those over whom Europe used to rule are expanding.

The biggest problem at the moment is not yet that we don’t have enough young men - we could still raise huge armies if we wanted to. The biggest problem is emotional: If we don’t have big enough surplus of restless young men ready for adventures and to risk their lives we are in danger of turning emotionally in to societies of old women. Emotionally our societies are in danger of losing the inner pressure that is needed for outward expansion or just to keep borders where they are now. Our enemies on the other hand have plenty of these reckless lads who are right now looking for new territory to conquer, battles to win and women to impress.

The great question is - can we over come the disadvantage of declining demographics through our superior military technology and organizational skills.

The answer in my opinion is YES - provided that we make a use of this one advantage as soon as possible because one day even that won’t be enough.

We must break the vicious cycle of declining demographics but demographic changes come very slowly at first and we can’t wait for decades so we must attack as long as we still have strength to do it.

In my opinion due to the dire demographic crisis in Russia, Europe must provide Russia with troops to help her defend her and our borders.

Does Russia need steel then?
The answer is no. Russia has a vast and highly developed arms industry that can easily provide Russia with all the necessary weapons. The war against the infiltrators will be also be a low tech war rather than a high tech war. To crush the infiltrator masses and their base areas within Russia requires more will and brutality than sophisticated technology.

Does Russia need fortifications?
The answer is no. The war against the infiltrators will be a highly mobile war, a war where we must be the aggressor, constantly on the offensive. If we start hiding behind fortifications we admit that we can’t control the situation, by showing fear we would then be admitting defeat.

In my opinion what Russia needs the most right now is will. Will to defend her borders at any cost by any means. Pan-European forces standing side by side with their Russian brothers would undoubtedly boost the morale in Russia to do what must be done so that Europe can live.

Protecting the actual border is not enough though. Active defense means that the first measures take place already beyond the border. Euro-Russia has vital interests to protect in Central Asia and Caucasus - oil and gas reserves.
USA has understood this as well which is why it tries desperately to spread its influence in this region.

Is USA then a credible competitor to Euro-Russia? The answer is NO. The pitiful forces USA manages to send to this area will not be able to control it if the US led system is challenged.

USA is plagued by its geographical position, how can it maintain a believable military force in this area from the other side of the world. For us both Caucasus and Central-Asia are right next door, logistically it would be easy to maintain considerable military forces in this region but for USA it could turn into a night mare.

Controlling Caucasus and Central Asia poses a psychological problem for USA as well. Since USA has only military and economic interests to protect in this region it could be very difficult for the American public to accept casualties in case protecting these interests leads into a conflict with local insurgent groups.
For us the case is very much different since Euro-Russia has much larger issues at stake in Caucasus and Central Asia - we will be defending the very existence of our civilization. - Never mind the oil, Europe’s first line of defense is in Samarkand.
Meddling in the complex affairs of Caucasus region and Central Asia could very well turn into one of those cases where Americans burn their fingers as they over extend their military strength and due to bad planning start to act like a bull in a china shop.

So when the going gets tough the Americans usually get going - but we don’t have that option. And there lies our strength, our strategic advantage.

A word of caution:
Central-Asia will most likely turn into a hotbed of violent conflicts in the future and the reason for this negative development is once again over population. The massive growth of the Central-Asian population and the resulting environmental crisis will create tremendous social pressures, which probably will lead into civil wars, religious fundamentalism and chaos. Due to oil and gas resources the economies of the Central-Asian have undoubtedly grown - unfortunately the population growth strips the results of the economic growth and leaves many people actually poorer than they originally were.

Secondly as the economic situation becomes more dire the legitimacy of the local governments will be challenged. Unfortunately for us most of the current governments in the region that are willing to cooperate with Russia (Euro/Russia some day) are thoroughly corrupted and undemocratic which means that it will be fairly easy for Muslim fundamentalists to challenge them as the social pressures mount.

Since Europe’s first line of defense is in Samarkand and due to the oil and gas resources it is absolutely vital that we manage to maintain a system of loyal political allies in this region. However we may be walking into a trap, which will be like Afghanistan, only ten times bigger this time. We may start off by supporting in an increasing scale friendly governments plagued by civil war and terrorism but end up being stuck into an impossible complex situation. The situation in Central-Asia may one day tie us into a gridlock and to open it we may have to consider a massive invasion.

This is a problem we must deal with since we cannot accept that “Afghanistan” would one day reach the northern border of Kazakhstan because that would threaten Euro/Russian life line to Eastern Siberia.

My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean

2007-08-29T02:02:00.000-07:00

Jack McConnell, former First Minister of Scotland, is a fine example of the lily-livered, treacherous “New Class” exposed by Michael O'Meara in NEW CULTURE, NEW RIGHT, a paragon amongst the multicultural yellow-bellies that have been chosen to lord over us but whose priorities lie elsewhere

Scotland has some of the worst child-poverty statistics in western Europe, but that won't be bothering this latter-day Mrs. Jellyby. "My two great passions are education and tackling poverty in Africa, so if there is anything I could have chosen to do then it would have been this. It's an absolute dream job." said McConnell, on taking up his new equatorial jolly. Poor Scots are right to feel abandoned by their deracinated NuLab elite.

Rolling up the sleeves

"It's now all about rolling up the sleeves and getting on with assisting us and our government partners in defining a sustainable, scalable and affordable solution to the challenges both countries [Rwanda and Malawi] face in education." said Sir Tom Hunter, McConnell's new employer, who with Bill Clinton heads the Clinton Hunter Development Initiative. If past experience is anything to go by, the only sleeve-rolling that will be taking place is in the bars and bedrooms of plush 5-star hotels in the tropics. Prime Minister Gordon Brown has already indicated that McConnell will become High Commissioner to Malawi when the post becomes vacant in 2009. According to Brown, Scotland has developed a “special relationship” with Malawi, which is probably news to the average Scotsman, or indeed the current occupant of the White House.

We don't want your sort here

Now, hilariously, it seems that McConnell is not welcome in Malawi, at least for a substantial proportion of the population. "To have a man who supports gay rights to come to Malawi is dangerous for us," said Mr Jumbe [Friday Jumbe, presidential candidate for the main opposition party, the United Democratic Front]. "He can easily use his influence as high commissioner to force legislation and that's my biggest fear.
"I don't want him and I know I am speaking for my party and many legislators that we cannot allow such a person in Malawi."

It's difficult to know where to start listing the objections to such an erroneous statement. For starters, Malawi is a sovereign nation and no foreign pink power can dictate legislation. Given McConnell's previous record of toeing the line, he's hardly likely to provoke a diplomatic incident. And finally, if by some miracle McConnell were able to single-handedly decriminalize homosexuality in Malawi, what fate would befall that far-away country? Will thousands of Malawians be rushing out to purchase imported 12” singles of Gloria Gaynor and the Weather Girls, causing a balance of payments crisis?

Countries like Malawi and Rwanda need to learn they can flourish without the likes of do-gooders such as Clinton, Turner and McConnell dishing out patronage.

Scotsman 27.08.07
Scotsman 15.08.07

Fascism and the Meaning of Life

2007-08-12T05:46:00.000-07:00

Review: MODERNISM AND FASCISM: The Sense of a Beginning under Mussolini and Hitler. Roger Griffin (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2007)

Roger Griffin, Professor in Modern History at Oxford Brookes University, first introduced the idea of 'Palingenesis' to the field of fascist studies over 15 years ago, making him immediately a leading figure in his chosen vocation. He isolated the syncretic fascist core as being palingenetic, populist ultra-nationalism, with overtones of a phoenix-like heroic rebirth. Since then he has extended and elaborated his theory that essential to the definition of the 'fascist minimum' is the notion of national rebirth or renaissance - “myths that generated policies and actions designed to bring about collective redemption, a new national community, a new society, a new man...engineered through the power of the modern state.” - culminating in this masterwork which rightly places fascism at the centre of wider modernist movements.

Epiphanic versus Programmatic Modernism

Griffin's insights have previously been recognized as audacious and perceptive, no more so than here. Part One of the book tackles the at first seemingly tricky concept of Modernism itself, which Griffin clarifies brilliantly. Modernism's “common denominator lies in the bid to achieve a sense of transcendent value, meaning of purpose despite Western culture's progressive loss of a homogeneous value system and overarching cosmology (nomos) caused by the secularizing and disembedding forces of modernization.” Modernization is experienced by those caught up in its slipstream as a relentless juggernaut unzipping the fabric of meaningful existence and leaving in its wake the abyss of permanently unresolved ambivalence. In short, Modernism is defined as a reaction against the decadent* nihilism of intellectual, societal and technical modernization. While Marx, other Leftists and liberals consider modern man's condition as one of angst and alienation induced by class warfare and industrial production, the Right sees anomie as both the cause and the principle symptom of our modern malaise. “It is the black hole of existential self-awareness in all of us, our fear of 'the eternal silence of infinite spaces' that so alarmed [Blaise] Pascal, which produces culture”. This modern culture is further divided by Griffin into what might be called introvert and extrovert reactions: the introvert reaction is generally individualistic and in Griffin's expression an 'epiphanic modernism' – the path of the artist – while the extrovert, collective reaction is defined as 'programmatic modernism'. The latter seeks to change the world and resolve the permanent crisis of modernity (“all that is solid melts into air” - Marx) by a collective act of 'reconnection forwards' (Moeller van den Bruck). It is not difficult to make the short step from 'programmatic modernism' to fascism; the transcendent politics proposed by van den Bruck at the beginning of the Twentieth Century are not so different from Guillaume Faye's 'Archaic Futurism' at its end. Both are, in the phrase of Guy Debord, “technically equipped archaism”.

Amongst the epiphanic modernists Griffin includes Nietzsche, Eliot, Joyce, Proust, van Gogh, Kandinsky and Malevich, but perhaps the truth of Griffin's argument is demonstrated by the man widely-acknowledged as the greatest modern painter: Picasso. In his earlier cubist works, Picasso sought inspiration from the primitivism of African masks, and later in the archetypal Mediterranean symbols of horses and particularly bulls (which surprisingly Griffin doesn't mention).

Gardening State

Following the exhaustive and enlightening dissection of modernism in Part One, Griffin explores the implications and applied politics in Part Two, where “modernity turbocharged by the conjuncture of the First World War, the Russian Revolution, the collapse of three absolutist regimes and a powerful monarchy, with an influenza epidemic that killed as many as 100 million people world wide had made the modernist drive to ward off the terror of the void – cultural, social and political – a phenomenon of mass culture. The new era would be a creatio ex profundis, an act of creativity defying the void.” Fascism aimed for a complete overhaul, in accordance with Emilio Gentile's observation of totalitarianism as “an experiment in political domination undertaken by a revolutionary movement.” Griffin introduces the idea of the pre-War Fascist and National Socialist regimes as 'gardening states' striking a successful balance between idyllic ruralism and technocratic modernism, the “compelling new imperative” that it obeyed “to clean up, to sterilize, to re-order, to eliminate dirt and dust” (Frances Saunders). Or neatly, if flippantly, summed up by Lars Lindholm, “For example, the Aryans (i.e. Germans, the blond and blue-eyed) are direct descendants from the Atlantean root-race, whereas the Jews, Negroes, Slavs, and anyone else for that matter, are unfortunate mutants, further away from Homo sapiens than the snottiest gorilla. The reason for all the troubles in this world is the presence of these unsavoury species that the master race should mercifully do away with so that peace and quiet could be restored and life imbued with a bit of style.” PILGRIMS OF THE NIGHT: Pathfinders of the Magical Way (Llewellyn, St. Paul MN, 1993). It was this same vision of hygienic modernity which inspired the building in London of bright new health centres in Peckham and Finsbury during the 1930s. But mild English pragmatism was no match for German determination, where public buildings were “an act of sacralization symbolized in the toned bodies of Aryan workers showering in the washrooms of newly built hygienic factories or playing football on a KdF sportsground, their camaraderie and zest for life expressing the hope for a young, healthy nation.”

Fascist aesthetics

Included in the book are illustrations of art and architecture not usually associated with the pre-War Fascist and National Socialist regimes: from the soaring arch designed by Adalberto Libera for the aborted EUR '42 exhibition in Rome (later ripped-off by Eero Saarinen for the St. Louis Gateway Arch), to the cool steel and glass structure designed by Morpugo encasing the Ara Pacis of Augustus, the 1933 blueprint for the new Reichsbank in Berlin by Gropius, or Baron Julius Evola's painterly experimentations with Dadaism. Goebbels is revealed as a fan of Edvard Munch and Fritz Lang, while Le Corbusier submitted plans for the new town of Pontinia in the recently-reclaimed Pontine Marshes. Fritz Todt celebrated Aryan technocratic power in his construction of autobahns and later the Atlantic Wall. Irene Guenther is quoted extolling 'Nazi Chic' with fashion displaying “another countenance, one that was intensely modern, technologically advanced, supremely stylized and fashionably stylish” and the Bauhaus influence on the new, burgeoning market in consumer durables is emphasised. Unlike previous historians of fascism with their simplistic and inflexible frameworks, Griffin admirably demonstrates that “fascism, despite the connotations of regression, reaction and flight from modernity it retains for some academics, is to be regarded as an outstanding form of political modernism”, encapsulating a “deadly serious attempt to realize an alternative logic, an alternative modernity and an alternative morality to those pursued by liberalism, socialism or conservatism”.

Ambition

Griffin is well aware of the boldness and ambition of his arguments. “Post-modern” academia is notoriously hostile to transdisciplinarity and historians today are loath to erect grand structures of interpretation and meaning. Few historians are less fashionable than Oswald Spengler, or even Samuel 'Clash of Civilizations' Huntington. Griffin is well aware of this problem, and in the introduction he specifically places MODERNISM AND FASCISM within the context of 'Aufbruch' (a breaking out of conventions). For this reason Griffin's style is reflexive: he is conscious of the fact that in proposing a new syncretic historical worldview he is in some ways mirroring the dynamics of fascism itself. Of course, European Identitarians and New Rightists will have no problem with the concept of evolutionary synthesis (it's no accident that one of the principal English-language New Right websites is called Synthesis), nevertheless Griffin is correctly keen to show and stress that his work is non-totalizing. Overall his style is extremely lucid and arguments that may appear at first to be mere flights of fancy are revealed as having firm foundations, unlike the convoluted, almost impenetrable and until recently-fashionable critical theory style of, say, Andrew Hewitt's POLITICAL INVERSIONS: Homosexuality, Fascism and the Modernist Imaginary (1996) or the late Lacoue-Labarthe's HEIDEGGER, ART AND POLITICS (1990).

The sky is falling on our heads

At the end of his book, Griffin draws attention to a BBC News report from September 1998. “The sky is falling” it announces dramatically (shades of Asterix and Obelix here) “The height of the sky has dropped by 8km in the last 38 years, according to scientists from the British Antarctic Survey. Greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide are believed to be responsible for creating the effect.” He goes on to speculate, “Had Nietzsche been philosophizing at the beginning of the twenty-first century instead of the end of the nineteenth, amidst Swiss glaciers shrivelling under skies where the abstract art of vapour trails punctures illusions of transcending Good and Evil, maybe he would have 'rethought all his ideas' in a different, greener 'framework'. Instead of railing against the advent of 'nihilism', 'decadence' and 'the last man', he might have realized that the time for any sort of 'eternal return' is rapidly running out in a literal, not symbolic sense.” In the intervening 9 years since that ominous BBC report, our carbon emissions have escalated tremendously while our climate has deteriorated further, thanks to global capitalism, free market economics, liberalism, population increase, mass migration across borders and above all the profound weakness and myopia in confronting the issue which is inherent to liberal democracies. We need to get a grip.

*not the frivolous, glamourized Sally Bowles Weimar “decadence” that the word conjures up in the minds of many gay men, but rather the very real awareness of decay; that all our greatest achievements as a civilization – the Renaissance, the Age of Discovery, the Moonshots – are behind us.

Homosexual Artist Torches $60,000 Koran

2007-07-29T03:14:00.000-07:00

Charles Merrill does his bit for global warming...

Charles Merrill, the out Palm Springs artist who recently gained notoriety for editing the Bible with a black marker and a pair of scissors, recently made a statement against Muslim homophobia by burning an antique Koran valued at $60,000. "The purpose of editing and burning Abrahamic Holy Books is to eliminate homophobic hate," Merrill stated in a press release posted online. "Both ancient books are terrorist manuals."
http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid47752.asp

More on Amsterdam Queerbashings

2007-07-29T02:41:00.000-07:00

And who's to blame? Not us! - say the Muslims.

“But Rauf Moussad then wonders why the incidence of violence against homosexuals should have increased particularly in the last few years, when Dutch society has been "diverse" for much longer. He believes it is a reaction to the anti-Islamic sentiments that have permeated the parties of the right since the rise of Ayaan Hirsi Ali. And many young Moroccans feel isolated and frustrated, says Mr Moussad.”
www.radionetherlands.nl/curretaffairs/ned070727

Queerbashing by Muslims in Amsterdam

2007-07-07T08:52:00.000-07:00

Europe continues its violent slide into Balkanization and the maelstrom of multiculturalism. Money quote: “Moroccans in particular sometimes go deliberately looking for gays in order to attack them, according to COC chairman Frank van Dalen.”

THE HAGUE, 05/07/07 - Gay rights organisation COC wants people convicted for assaulting homosexuals banned from entering areas that are known to be frequented by gays.
The Amsterdam police said yesterday that four reports of assault had been received from homosexuals during the past week. Until then, only six reports had been received this year.
COC appealed in the past week for violent incidents to be reported to the police more often after six immigrants beat up two gay men in Amsterdam last Thursday. Five of the six suspects have meanwhile been released from pre-trial custody. They are aged between 15 and 19.
Four of the suspects are Moroccan. Moroccans in particular sometimes go deliberately looking for gays in order to attack them, according to COC chairman Frank van Dalen.
COC has asked Harm Brouwer, the chief of the Public Prosecutors' Office (OM), to ensure that convicted offenders are given court orders to stay out of certain zones such as the Reguliersdwarsstraat in Amsterdam. This is the capital's 'gay street'.
NIS News Bulletin Netherlands

Aryan Consciousness

2007-07-07T08:48:00.000-07:00

I've found through personal experience that the easiest route to understanding the core of Aryan spirituality (apart from hallucinogens) is by reflecting on the insights of Georges Dumezil, Alain Danielou, Edred Thorsson (Stephen Flowers), Alby Stone etc. and their tri-partite structural theory of Indo-European metaphysics, culture and society, based in part on the human body. It is this nexus that in one direction links to Hindu and Buddhist non-dualism, in another direction links to Nietzsche and Heidegger, and in a third direction directly links to the earliest Aryan myths, worldview and societal structures that are the continuing unacknowledged inspiration for our civilization today.

Pagan Regeneration

2007-06-22T03:46:00.000-07:00

REVIEW: ON BEING A PAGAN. Alain de Benoist (Ultra, Atlanta, 2004)

My initial impression of reading Alain de Benoist is of being pleasantly accosted by the archetypal French philosopher and being taken to a Paris café where the author engages in vibrant, passionate argument across a table stacked with bottles of red wine while gesticulating with a Gitane. By the end of the first few chapters this impression of frivolity has dissipated as the force of de Benoist's argument takes over. His style is vivid, knowledgeable and playful – but the ideas he plays with are profound and soon the idea and the power of his position take dominance. The chatty French voice is overwhelmed by the strength and depth of his arguments and insights.

In the bulk of the book, de Benoist compares and contrasts Europe's original Aryan spirituality with the later infestation of Semitic monotheism from the Middle East. Here is a polemic for anyone who desires to understand how truly corrosive Semitic monotheism has been in Europe, not just on homosexuality and sexuality generally, but more profoundly and shockingly on the deepest strata of Aryan (here called Indo-European, presumably out of politeness) psyche and culture. Jews/ Christians/ Muslims are shown as introducing an alien antithesis to the core beliefs of our culture. Whatever the prevailing Aryan cultural values of any particular time, you can be sure that the Semitic monotheists believed the opposite.

Towards the end of the book, de Benoist embarks on a description and history of non-dualist mystical philosophy in Europe. Non-dualism is a tricky subject: it is the one mode of thought that forever slips from the grasp of expression (like trying to explain the 4-dimensional space-time continuum, or quantum mechanics). When I worked at Watkins esoteric bookshop off Charing Cross Road, we had a whole floor dedicated to non-dualist/ advaita literature. So much to say so little! Alain de Benoist’s last few chapters are no different, yet he makes a better bash of it than most, and importantly puts the subject into a European cultural context.

Once again in a recent book review, I feel compelled to say a word about what I consider to be a mis-matched front cover, that reminds me more than anything of the rather lurid covers favoured by American publishers Llewellyn to adorn their pagan book titles ten years ago. Some people may enjoy the artwork of Madeline von Foerster, with its graphic depiction of Odin flanked by his totem animal symbols of wolf and raven, lifting in his one hand a drinking horn and in the other gesturing the reader to accept the offering of an eye of wisdom. I would prefer a cover inspired by 1930s political poster art, or a science-fiction-style spacescape depicting Imperial battleships patrolling a hazardous solar system at the further reaches of our galaxy, bringing order to chaos. Both alternatives would be just as fitting.

London: Canary Wharf

2007-05-31T13:13:00.000-07:00

7.15pm GMT Thursday 31 May 2007

GAPS IN GERMANY'S NEW RIGHT

2007-05-26T03:09:00.000-07:00

REVIEW: GERMANY'S NEW RIGHT AS CULTURE AND POLITICS. Roger Woods (Palgrave, Basingstoke 2007)

In this clear and workmanlike report and assessment of the New Right in Germany, Roger Woods first of all examines the cultural background, then goes on to explore the problematic Conservative Revolutionary and National Socialist legacy, New Right values and programmes, before reaching a somewhat downbeat conclusion. “The New Right project of providing itself with a cultural dimension as a solid foundation for new political thinking has not gone according to plan” says Woods, early-on.

Woods outlines three phases of New Right development in Germany since 1968; firstly as a meta-political movement taking its lead from the French New Right interpretation of Gramsci and culture combined with 1970s ideology, then the period 1982-1989 when the New Right served as a right wing corrective to right wing German Federal and Land governments and also in the historians dispute, and finally from 1989, after the collapse of socialism, when issues of national identity came to the fore.

The most interesting parts of the book deal with the ambiguous inheritance of Conservative Revolutionary thinkers of the Weimar Republic and the background of cultural pessimism. Woods emphasizes the uncertainty many German New Right thinkers betray despite promoting traditional values such as the Church, Family, Nation/ State. The cultural pessimist insight is that all these ideas have been tried, and failed, and that modernity in all its aspects is irreversible. With the current ecological crisis of climate change and industrial pollution, as Botho Strauss points out, not even nature can be relied upon. The quest for institutions that can embody transcendental values is abandoned. It is this feeling of resignation that allows German New Right thinkers like Martin Schwarz to contemplate compromise with Islam: “In a speech to the right wing organization Synergon Deutschland Martin Schwarz declares that if Europeans were to adopt the principles of Islam their nations would flourish”. “We live in a time of chaos and disintegration. If we wish to survive we must not convince ourselves that our main aim is to confront those people who are being uprooted and tossed around as the old order disintegrates...There is no Islamic conspiracy to bring down the West!” - Martin Schwarz.

Opposed to this defeatism are a minority including Pierre Krebs of Thule Seminar: “In the land of Nietzsche and Wagner, Bach and Kant, Clausewitz and Thomas Münzer a single word could fan the red glow of history back to life, smash to pieces half a century of dictatorial 'reeducation' that thought it could displace this word from the mind of a whole people without encountering any resistance”.

From an English perspective, this cultural pessimism may seem a result of over-intellectualizing and the particular, awkward memory for Germans of the NSDAP. If, as it is commonly held, Europe is a Symphony of Nations, then we have already heard the majesty of Mussolini and the sombre, expressionist tones of German National Socialism; yet England, the Celtic lands, Scandinavia, central Europe and Russia have so far remained silent. Let Russia sing and England and France take up the reprise! (Britain's particular excuse for European dis-engagement has been its global empire, its invention of the modern world, and currently its maintenance through force, financial power and flim-flam of that same decaying world).

Unfortunately, there is a significant oversight of which this book is guilty. I would argue that the major fault with the German New Right, and Woods account of it, is a lack of awareness of our true, shared pre-Christian Aryan heritage. As for Christianity, there seems little point in falling back on the tradition of a religion if that religion is wrong; and not only wrong, but destructive. German religious traditionalists are still mainly Christian, thereby continuing the Semitic monotheist intrusion into Aryan spirituality. How can Germans “return” to a faith that caused them so much physical and mental harm, from encouraging Charlemagne to slaughter thousands of pagan Saxons in order to force conversion, or that wasted Germany for generations after the carnage of the Thirty Years War?

Neither Roger Woods nor the examples he cites have much time for the insights of European paganism and the apparent pre-Christian Aryan ideology uncovered by Indo-Europeanists like Georges Dumezil and Alby Stone. European pagan metaphysics in conjunction with the ideas of Western philosophers such as Nietzsche and Heidegger and the political outlook of Evola and Yockey can provide meaning, to resist the onslaught of nihilist modernism and the doubts and uncertainties expressed by New Right thinkers in Germany. This is where the German New Right, and the New Right across Europe, will find the “fixed points”, the traditions, the models for a functioning society, and the new elan – the new spirit of adventure, hope, and destiny – for which the German New Right, and many Europeans more generally, have been searching.

This new spirit must originate from and embody the European Faustean sensibility; it must embrace synthesis, science and technology: “The fascist is obsessed with an ideal of Modernity and youth: he wants to create a new man, a lover of sport and autosport, living in a new city which has been given new life by futuristic architecture. He is an admirer of Le Cobusier, Marinetti, Gropius. He loves motors, mechanical engineering and speed.” - Zeev Sternhell, quoted on p68.

I have just two caveats for a book that is otherwise fair as far as it goes:
- for a book published in mid-2007, the references don't extend beyond Summer 2004 at the latest, as far as I can see. I don't blame the author for this; publication schedules are often delayed.
- secondly, the front cover appears to be a (totally uncredited) photograph of the Holocaust memorial in Berlin. According to the text within, “For the New Right, however, the Holocaust memorial is 'the last testament of the generation of 68'. Before they retire they want to deal Germany a blow which will shake it to its core. Junge Freiheit quotes Rudolf Augustein's view that the memorial is aimed against the newly emerging Germany in Berlin and the sovereignty that Germany had taken so long to restore”. To choose this particular image to illustrate the cover of a book on Germany's New Right is singularly inappropriate, almost a calculated insult directed at the book's readers.

Decline and Fall

2007-05-20T04:27:00.000-07:00

There were at least four major reasons why Christianity superseded paganism towards the end of the Roman Empire (and countless minor reasons, such are the contingencies of fate):

a. Demographic changes within the Roman Empire. It’s well known that Christianity deliberately set out to appeal to Rome’s multi-cultural lumpenproletariat and slave underclasses, groups that were growing all the time, in opposition to the original Roman Citizens who were the culture-bearers of Hellenic civilization. “What made the oracle at Delphi mute was not the eventual discovery of some sort of trick, but the disappearance of the Greeks.” – Jean-Luc Marion.

b. Political expediency. As the office of Emperor was transformed increasingly into a bejewelled despotic Eastern Potentate (think Xerxes in 300), Constantine realized that a formal link to strict, unified monotheism was to the advantage to him and his dynastic successors.

c. Changes within paganism itself. Paganism was moving toward a more explicitly non-dualist philosophy. Belief in the gods of Olympus was evolving into a religion not dissimilar in outlook to today’s dharmic eastern Aryan religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism etc.. This had two direct consequences: it made pagans even more tolerant (contrary to subsequent Christian propaganda about “persecutions”) and also meant that paganism itself became more difficult to grasp for many ordinary folk, compared to the black-and-white certainties presented by Christianity.

d. Christianity also was being modified by exposure to the European mind-set, most dramatically by replacing the strict monotheism of early Jewish Jerusalem-Christianity with such pagan notions as the Trinity (Trimurti in Hinduism/ Odin-Vili-Ve in Germanic mythology), saints and holidays. Erich Fromm has described the conversion of Europe to Christianity as “largely a sham”, a view shared by Oswald Spengler amongst many others. “European peasants could only eventually find communion with Christian theology by transforming Christ into a bearded god who lived and worked like them” – Mircea Eliade.

I strongly disagree that the paganism of the late Empire lacked depth; as I stated above, it’s partly because of its subtle complexity that it went into decline, at least amongst the uneducated classes (although Hindu peasants today seem to have no problem with the implications of advaita).

Any notion of a serious revival of the original Olympian religion today is ridiculous. Modern “Faustean” paganism needs to develop from the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger and even such Christian mystics as Meister Eckhart and Paracelsus.

Greek Philosophy and Particle Accelerators

2007-05-06T11:06:00.000-07:00

Heraclitus and Non-Dualism

The pre-Socratic Greek philosopher Heraclitus has been heroized by many since his death, most recently by European Identitarians and the European New Right.

Heraclitus famously postulated that all things in the Universe are made of One Thing: Fire. In a sense, he is right, if by Fire you mean energy; if Fire is interpreted as energy. Energy and mass are interchangeable, as triumphantly demonstrated by nuclear physics. They are in the final analysis One Thing. Eastern Aryan philosophy (the Dharmic religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism) had already postulated the idea of the One Thing: consciousness. In effect, they were saying that consciousness is energy; the One Thing that in the cosmos of Heraclitus everything is made from: Fire. We don’t yet know (due to the lack so far of the remaining fragments of recorded writings) whether Heraclitus himself was explicitly non-dualist.

“This world was created not by God or men,” wrote Heraclitus “but it existed, exists and will exist forever like an eternal living flame…” ON BEING A PAGAN, Alain de Benoist p143.

Man, by being conscious, and also self-reflective, partakes of the divine. He is as much that One Thing as everything else. “the gods are immortal men, whereas men are mortal gods; our life is their death and our death is their life” – Heraclitus. “That is not dead which can eternal lie. And with strange aeons even death may die.” – horror-fiction writer H.P. Lovecraft.

One of the aims of Aryan Futurism is to demonstrate and prove, by experimentation with matter (in accordance with our Aryan Faustean/ Promethean spirit), that consciousness and energy are the same thing, in the words of Heraclitus: Fire.

What happens to consciousness during FTL (faster than light travel)? The Greeks and Shakespeare believed that nothing is swifter than thought.

Enlightenment? Drugs help, and hallucinogens are sacred in all Aryan religions. Everything is on fire and everything is burning with consciousness. We are burning the time barrier, burning space and burning consciousness, simply by existing.

If I have succeeded in establishing a connection between Heraclitus and advaita Hindu and other non-dualist philosophies, then that is an accomplishment I hoped to do: a synthesis of eastern Aryan and western Aryan philosophy.

NB: Fascism has always claimed to be the ultimate synthesis – the final resolution. Fascistic Thought is always at the vanguard of seeking resolutions to the most contemporary dilemmas: left versus right, poor versus rich, environment versus big business, thallasocracy versus continental empire, globalized consumer capitalism versus European Identitarianism and nationalism, the individual versus the collective. Liberal, multicultural “gay” versus the Aryan homosexual.

For that reason, we European Fascists (defined in the sense of the true inheritors of the Hegelian dialectic) are always at the forefront of any dilemma, seeking resolution. We are surfers at the crest of the wave. So Fascism is best thought of as a process; a process whereby conflicting polarities are resolved.

Of course there are differences between historical Fascism and Aryan Futurism, not least the latter’s belief in pan-Europeanism and the pagan Aryan Imperium with a stronger emphasis on technology and expansion into outer space, and our Olympian destiny.

Of course I believe in the Gods because I created them and they created me. In Europe, European Identitarians and continental New Rightists have examined our current dilemmas with surgical precision.

You know I’m right.

Lascaux 15,000 bce

2007-04-28T05:57:00.000-07:00

Franz Marc 1880-1916

2007-04-28T05:41:00.000-07:00

Red and Blue Horses

The Fate of Liberal Multiculturalists

2007-04-23T11:53:00.000-07:00

Extreme cognitive dissonance can lead to one of two extreme reactions; either a shattering of delusions, sometimes dramatic, in the mind of the subject, or an even greater adherence against logic to the tenets of the zealot's belief-system.

For liberal multiculturalists and anti-Aryan racists, confronted with the appalling results of their misguided beliefs, a damascene conversion to European Identitarian ideology is probably the easiest and least painful option. But a few will stubbornly draw a line in the sand, their protestations against encroaching reality becoming ever more shrill.

From this stump we can expect no sense or reason. They will defiantly defend any minority-ethnic practice, however abhorrent, against the will of the native population. They will insist that immigration from the third world continue, if not accelerate, despite all the cultural, economic and environmental consequences. Their condemnation of nationalists and European Identitarians will become increasingly hysterical and desperate.

In particular, they will cling to the assertion that the national economy is essentially sound, for they are aware (if only dimly) that the admission of a faltering economy is sure to release the demons from the box.

London: Tate Modern & St. Paul's

2007-04-15T04:17:00.000-07:00

Tate Modern & St. Paul's Cathedral, 11am 15 April 2007

Why I am a Member of the NPD

2007-04-11T11:29:00.000-07:00

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

The NPD (National Democratic Party of Germany) is the only progressive party in Germany. It is anti-capitalist and socialist. It rejects Marxist mumbo-jumbo but positively accepts the good aspects of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). The former manager of the NPD in Saxony, Juergen Schoen, even exclaimed (in 1998) that "the GDR was the better Germany!" (as opposed to the degenerate Federal Republic of Germany)

While the NPD does distance itself from historical National Socialism, virtually all of its organs routinely praise the Fuehrer and various aspects of his regime (some of which are worth praising). This, of course, is not the official position of the NPD. After all, it also embraces the different ideas espoused by National Revolutionaries who were always opposed to Hitler's regime. The NPD tries to incorporate all aspects of German nationalism, including National Socialism. Even Udo Voigt (the head of the party) said so in an interview with the national conservative newspaper JUNGE FREIHEIT (Young Freedom).

The NPD is not only looking to the past for inspiration, but also towards a future that might be the product of a new theory, incorporating both elements from the right (nationalism) and left (anti-imperialism and socialism). The NPD is following the philosophy of the Third Way. Its newspaper, DEUTSCHE STIMME (German Voice), shows that it does not shy away from fundamental criticism of various policies the Third Reich pursued (for example, several articles favorably review the achievements of such illustrous enemies of NS as National Bolshevik Ernst Niekisch and Revolutionary National Socialist Otto Strasser). The NPD is definitely not a "neo-Nazi" party. On the contrary, it is truly national revolutionary in both spirit and action.

Reinhold Oberlercher, an ex-Red (famous theoretician of the 1968 student revolt) became a member of the NPD. Oberlercher calls himself a "National Marxist." He views the Bolshevik Revolution as an Asiatic counterrevolution. Another great German nationalist theoretician is Dr. Michael Nier. He used to be a member of the SED (Socialist Unity Party) and a professor for dialectical and historical materialism at the Humboldt University in East Berlin. After the collapse of the GDR, he became a member of the NPD and tried to establish a National Bolshevik wing of the party. He was sort of successful in the beginning as the party actually tried to establish contact with the Chinese and North Korean leadership. However, reactionaries in the party crushed the National Bolshevik wing. Disappointed, Nier left the party. He still supports the NPD, though, as he views it as the only real oppositional party in Germany.

The NPD is the only party in Germany that openly advocates race realism. The DEUTSCHE STIMME often publishes articles on race theory. For example, in a recent article, it highlighted the Nordic/Germanic roots of Ancient Rome (citing the well-known racial scientist Hans F. K. Guenther).

The NPD espouses not only a nationalist ideology but also a pan-European one. It actively collaborates with nationalist and racialist organizations in Europe and the rest of the White world. The NPD wants to establish close relationships with nationalist parties in Russia. This is an extremely positive development as it cements the eternal brotherhood of Germany and Russia. The famous nationalist folk singer and member of the NPD Frank Rennicke gave two concerts in Russia (Moscow and Leningrad). Both were a smashing success, and Rennicke spent hours signing autographs for Russian fans. Also, the leader of the Russian nationalist organization PAMYAT gave a rousing speech at the DEUTSCHE STIMME Press Fest in 2004.

Unfortunately, a lot of NPD members are quite reactionary in that they stubbornly demand that Germany regain its territory according to the borders of 1937. This is a completely ridiculous demand, of course, and will never happen. I often wonder what the point in such a demand is. While Berlin is swamped with Turks and other non-desirables, and the German population is committing suicide, all these reactionaries can do is demand tiny strips of land that mean nothing in the coming Imperivm Evropa (since borders will become increasingly transparent).

For its logo, the NPD uses the German imperial colors black, white and red. Of course, these three colors are also the three ancient Aryan colors. Without the NPD, Germany has no chance of awakening from its current slumber of death. Without an awake Germany (the heart of Europe), Europe has no chance of regaining its former dignity and might.

Part II

The NPD is the only party in Germany that warns of the imminent threat that large-scale non-White immigration is posing to the integrity of the biological substance of the White race as a whole. Unlike the establishment parties, the NPD realizes that Europe is being colonized by new barbarians from the south. The Franco-German New Right philosopher Pierre Krebs regularly warns the readers of the DEUTSCHE STIMME of a very real Islamic threat.

At the DEUTSCHE STIMME Press Fest in 2006, Waffen-SS veteran and nationalist writer Herbert Schweiger gave a speech about the geopolitical necessity of a close alliance between Germany and Russia. He fervently exclaimed, "Russia needs Germany, and Germany needs Russia!" While he was giving the speech, the dumb skinheads (who, unfortunately, made up the majority of the Press Fest's attendees) listened to a stupid concert at another stage. Some of them wore ridiculous shirts that had a map of former East Prussia on them, with slogans such as "This is the real East Germany." If these pathetic creeps would have listened to a real National Socialist like Herbert Schweiger instead of listening to White nigger music (also known as White Power music), they might have learned a thing or two about the importance of a unified Europe instead of the unimportance of petty nationalism.

The NPD is anti-imperialist in the sense that it is opposed to the anti-White policies that AmeriKa is currently pursuing. AmeriKa's belligerent actions are not in the interest of Europeans. The NPD romanticizes the German Reich. It describes itself as "nationalist and socialist" (which reminds one of the imperial glory of the Third Reich). It is a mistake to demand a "Europe of the fatherlands" (like the NPD does). Only Europe AS A NATION will be able to defeat the enemies of the White race. Nationalism is regressive. Nevertheless, the NPD advocates a Europe that finds its way back to its age-old traditions and myths. The idea of the German Reich is modern in the sense that it evokes the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation which in itself was the continuation of the Roman Empire and hence the legitimate incarnation of the eternal idea of Imperivm Evropa. Pan-Europeanism is progressive. The NPD needs to develop a strong imperial (as opposed to imperialist) outlook, although it is already heading in the right direction.

Other articles by Constantin von Hoffmeister can be read here http://nationalfuturism.org/index.html

Same-sexer/ homosexual versus “gay”

2007-04-07T03:16:00.000-07:00

I'm happy to be called a homosexual man: a same-sexer. I don't like being described as “gay”. For me, “gay” means an uncritical, passive acceptance of cosmopolitan consumer capitalism, like a sheep. A silly pink sheep decorated with ribbons and bells and bows.

I prefer to think for myself.

Even worse is LGBTT&I. I don't want to be lumped together with a bunch of in-betweenies like Tinky Winky from the Teletubbies. Or some unisex freak from Dr. Dolittle such as the Pushmi-pullyu which doesn't know whether it's coming or going.

I've got far more in common with a happy straight man, even if he's not “gay”, than a man who wants to chop off his cock.

The politically-correct term “sexual orientation” is just as bad, a Cultural Marxist catch-all that can include pedophiliacs, necrophiliacs or worse (probably involving a Pushmi-pullyu). DOWN WITH “DIVERSITY”!

No wonder “gay” has become a joke; an insult.

New Labour's Busted flush

2007-03-23T10:30:00.000-07:00

If anyone's in any doubt about the craven capitulation and betrayal by the multicultural elite...

"Since coming to office nearly seven years ago, Mr. Livingstone has become a symbol of the marriage of the European left and the Islamist right. It's a marriage of mutual convenience and, at least on one side, actual belief. In the Netherlands, a recent study by the University of Amsterdam's Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies found that 80% of immigrants--the overwhelming majority of whom are Muslims--voted for the Labor party in recent elections, while the two main center-right parties received a combined 4% of the immigrant vote. In neighboring Belgium, the left-wing sociologist Jan Hertogen credits immigrants for "[saving] democracy" by voting as a bloc against the secessionist and anti-immigrant Vlaams Belang party."
Bret Stephens, Wall Street Journal 18.03.07
http://www.opinionjournal.com/wsj/?id=110009802

Here's a more robust response, following the fatal shooting of a Dutchman by a trigger-happy police officer (apparently from an ethnic minority) in Utrecht a week ago:

"We demand that all Muslim immigration in whatever form should be immediately and completely halted, and that our authorities take a long break from mass immigration in general until such a time when law and order has been reestablished in our major cities. We will not accept any accusations of "racism." Many European nations have for decades accepted more immigration into our countries in a shorter period of time than any other people has done peacefully in human history. We are sick and tired of feeling like strangers in our own lands, of being mugged, raped, stabbed, harassed and even killed by violent gangs of Muslim thugs, yet being accused of "racism and xenophobia" by our media and intimidated by our own authorities to accept even more such immigration.
Europe is being targeted for deliberate colonization by Muslim states, and with coordinated efforts aimed at our Islamization and the elimination of our freedoms. We are being subject to a foreign invasion, and aiding and abetting a foreign invasion in any way constitutes treason. If non-Europeans have the right to resist colonization and desire self-determination then Europeans have that right, too. And we intend to exercise it."
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1980

We have a duty to do this. Here's the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which I've lifted from Friday's Gay.com Nigeria story...

"[T]he UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide characterises genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, such as:

(a)Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction, in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and/or, (e) Forcible transfer of children of the group to another group.”

NB: NuLab's social and economic policies against the native British population violate clauses b,c, and d of the UN Genocide Convention.

Sorry for Slavery?

2007-03-18T06:25:00.000-07:00

We should no more apologize for slavery than we should expect an apology from north Africans for enslaving our own countrymen and women: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_Pirates

It was my ancestors (and yours, too, unless you're Lord Muck or the Queen) who were sent up chimneys or down mines while they were still children, or stripped of their land and homes during the 18th Century Enclosures and press-ganged into suffocating ships-of-the-line. When is somebody going to apologize for all that and, even more pertinently, who should that somebody be?

Percentage-wise Europeans are becoming a smaller and smaller minority all the time, all over the planet. If you want any more evidence of how Christians and multiculturalists are determined to guilt-trip the Europeans that remain, just take a look at this, sponsored by the local church: http://www.southwark.anglican.org/download/WalkPoster%20amended.pdf

Happily, American nationalists had the gumption to demonstrate against this pathetic “Yokes and Chains” rabble in 2004, as they acknowledge on their lifelineexpedition site: http://www.lifelineexpedition.co.uk/content/view/18/46/

Our Erratic Economy

2007-03-18T06:02:00.000-07:00

We are heading toward civil unrest/ war across Europe, although it won't happen before the next economic downturn. The last recession we endured in Britain was during 1990-91 and was relatively mild. The next one will be a bloodbath. That's why system politicians, economists and business leaders will go to any lengths to talk-up the economy.

It's interesting how a variety of excuses have been used to explain market falls over the past month or so; first it was blamed on the Japanese Yen carry trade, then the threat of China imposing extra taxes on stock-market transactions, and now defaults in the US subprime mortgage market.

I predict that as the markets continue their erratic fall, new excuses will be found; first, defaults spreading to the mainstream US mortgage market, then worries about formerly-legitimate businesses now owned by hedge funds and private equity firms. Once mainstream media starts extensively reporting the US double-deficit and the hollow dollar, you'll know it's time to get your gun (the salient point about guns is that you don't need training to use them).

As anyone with even half a brain knows, global “free trade” is a racket whereby the cosmopolitan plutocratic elite are able to enrich and pile-on obscene amounts of money for themselves. The sooner it collapses, the better for the rest of us, and for the environment.

The only way of avoiding bloodshed in Europe due to societal breakdown is by ensuring that European governments enact New Right/ European Identitarian/ nationalist policies BEFORE the economic collapse.

The Play of Aryan Archetypes in Space 1999

2007-03-08T05:41:00.000-08:00

Although Aryan themes abound in science fiction comics, books, TV and films, I will concentrate on those that run like a thread through the 1970s British TV series Space 1999.

Gerry Anderson's mid-70s live-action series starts with the Moon being blasted out of Earth's orbit after the catastrophic explosion of a lunar nuclear waste dump, and the rest of the series follows the adventures of the Alphans – inhabitants of Earth's only lunar colony, Moonbase Alpha – as they hurtle through the cosmos at unlikely speed. The initial premise of the Moon leaving Earth's orbit is an interesting reversal of Hans Hörbiger's Welteislehre: the scientific theory, popular in 1930s Germany, which proposed a succession of ice-formed moons sequentially crashing to Earth. The popularity of this theory can be explained in part by its similarity to ancient Germanic mythological concepts of the creation of the cosmos from the dynamic interaction between fire and ice, and therefore appealed directly to northern European race-consciousness.

Anderson's Space 1999 lasted for just two series, with the first judged generally far better - and more metaphysical – than the second. The latter series suffered the misfortune of being produced by Fred Freiberger, who had previously ruined the third series of Star Trek. All episodes mentioned below (Episode 3. Black Sun; Episode 14. Death's Other Dominion; Episode 16. End of Eternity; Episode 22. Mission of the Darians; Episode 24. The Testament of Arkadia) are from the first series.

In addition to these specific episodes, Space 1999 retained an identifiably British occult sensibility in other episodes by starring Hammer Horror stalwarts Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, and with stories by Irish author Johnny Byrne, who has expressed his interest in Celtic mythology.

Black Sun

The most interesting feature of this early episode is the title itself, which has a long history in Aryan esotericism. Already by 1974, when this episode was shot, the commonly accepted designation for the interstellar gravity-pit that captures the Moon and its crew of Alphans was a “black hole”. The Alphans avoid their expected disintegration and annihilation on encountering this particular Black Sun, and instead undergo an enlightening mystical experience.

Death's Other Dominion

As the Moon drifts past the ice-blue planet of Ultima Thule, Commander Koenig decides to send an expedition to the surface. On landing the Alphans almost perish in a frozen wasteland, until rescued by a typically bombastic Brian Blessed. Blessed's band of rugged Thulians (formerly earthmen and women) have discovered the secret of immortality. Blessed offers the Alphans everlasting life in his “We shall be as gods of the universe...” speech, but the Alphans conclude that the price demanded is too high. In a previous scene they have been tipped off to the lurking danger by the trickster archetype in the form of a transposed medieval court jester. The episode was directed by veteran British director Charles Crichton, who was also responsible for editing H.G. Wells' 1936 classic Things to Come and directing a few of the post-war Ealing comedies. Ultima Thule in European mythology is the sacred land at or near the North Pole and an original Aryan homeland. Blessed's immortal followers, although they have access to the highest technologies, still dress in fur-skins.

End of Eternity

In this episode the Alphans rescue the oversized alien prisoner Balor from a sealed cave hidden deep within a passing comet. The inside of cave is painted with the grotesque scenes of horror and destruction that Balor had unleashed on his home-planet, a fate that awaits the Alphans should they be unable to return Balor to his entombment. Apart from the obvious reference to Balor of the Evil Eye from Irish mythology (the story was written by Johnny Byrne), the character can also be seen as a reference to other bound-giants of Aryan mythology, notably Prometheus and Loki. Like the culture-heroes Loki and Prometheus, the alien prisoner is portrayed as a catalyst to dramatic evolutionary change, and is punished for his efforts.

Mission of the Darians

The Darians (named from the Ancient Greek tribe of Dorians, and perhaps more remotely from the divine Celtic tribe of Tuatha Dé Danann) inhabit a generational galactic starship which had suffered a nuclear disaster some 900 years before the arrival of the Alphans. Led by the regal Joan Collins (who memorably guest-starred in such Sixties TV science fiction classics as Batman opposite Adam West and Star Trek: City on the Edge of Forever) the chiton-clad Darians' ignoble mission is to survive as best they can by harvesting the organs and otherwise exploiting the less fortunate members of the crew who were previously abandoned in the contaminated regions of the vast ship. This is a basic re-telling of the modern European Industrial myth of the bifurcation of society into haves and have-nots; first posited as science fiction by H.G. Wells in The Time Machine (Morlocks and Eloi) and first filmed by Fritz Lang in Metropolis. The story was again written by Johnny Byrne, who also wrote the final episode of the first series, The Testament of Arkadia.

The Testament of Arkadia

This, the final episode of the first series, is the most explicit and influential of all the mythologically-driven plots; drawing on contemporary “ancient astronaut” von Däniken theories of the first impulse to civilization and older, Theosophical notions of the origins of mankind.

The lead character, Luke, played by Italian actor Orso Maria Guerrini, resembles Freddie Mercury during his 80s clone incarnation, complete with convincing clone moustache. It was no accident that he was chosen for his Indo-Iranian/ Persian good looks (“Testament Of Arcadia still generated a spiritual frisson when I last saw it - though at that time money was tight and we were lumbered with Italian leading men who could hardly speak a word of English.” - Johnny Byrne).

The Alphans use their Eagle spaceships to land on the apparently-dead world of Arkadia, which at first sight resembles a desolate WWI battlescape. Luke (from the Proto-Indo-European root word light: *leuk) stumbles into a skeleton-strewn cave and discovers a tablet with writing engraved into the wall. That this significant discovery is made in a cave is also no accident: the supreme act of the apotheosis of the Persian god Mithras, the sacred taurobolium – slaying of the bull – is performed in a cave. “The cave in which the 'bull' seeks refuge at the end of its run, corresponds to the alchemical 'cave of mercury' which is often associated with the subtle centre of the body located at the base of the spine, which the Hindu call muladhara; the Hindus relate it to the tattva [roughly: Truth] of the earth.” The Path of Enlightenment in the Mithraic Mysteries – Julius Evola

The engraved writing is in Sanskrit, and tells of how all life came to an end on the planet 25,000 years previously in “the light of a thousand suns” - an obvious reference to the quote from the Bhagavad Gita, famously recalled by J. Robert Oppenheimer on witnessing the Trinity first nuclear test explosion.

Luke and his female Alphan companion Anna read about how a few of the Arkadians managed to escape the catastrophe and establish their culture on a new planet – Earth. Luke and Anna come to understand, via some psychic Arkadian device, that their destiny is to bring life back to Arkadia, thus fulfilling a pre-ordained circuit in space and time. Their conversation is sprinkled with references to Providence - “when the lines of destiny meet” - and allusions to “going home”; realizations of the nature of fate which put them at odds with their “non-initiated” Alphan companions.

The name Arkadia/ Arcadia itself has huge resonance: named by the Pelasgians for the most favoured region in Ancient Greece and referenced in the Poussin painting that helped kick-off the whole Holy Blood, Holy Grail/ da Vinci Code phenomenon.

“The name 'Arcadia', written alternatively with 'k', is derived from the Sanskrit word arka respectively, the stem 'ar(k)', containing the mystical 'ra' symbolizing cyclic return. Its derivations prove to be a repository of Polar lore.
“The word arka means 'ray' or 'flash'. Both arka-tanaya or arka-nandana are translated 'Saturn'. Derived from arka, arcat means 'shining' and is one with the word catar or Cathar, explained previously. From arcat 'Arcadia' is derived. The Land of the Living is the Shining Realm or the Luminous Land of the Spirit-Light. The word arka-mandala has the meaning of 'disc of the sun', exoterically depicting the luminary in the solar system, esoterically applying to the Black Sun that shines above the Midnight Mountain.” Polaria: The Gift of the White Stone. W.H. Müller (Albuquerque, 1996).

http://www.space1999.net/catacombs/

Valkyries and Brassy Barmaids

2007-02-26T12:41:00.000-08:00

Our culture has always been one that values public discourse and a life lived openly. The typical Ancient Greek city state was studded with theatres, stadia, gymnasia and agoras where men spent their days mixing openly and publicly. The frequent religious festivals and games for both men and women encouraged further communal revelry.

Unsurprisingly this openness extended even to clothing and fashion, which was kept to a practical minimum. How different from the dense cumbersome coverings of the peoples further south and east!

CONTRAST WITH SEMITES

This vivacious conduct is in stark contrast to the closed, isolationist way of life practiced by the patriarchal, nuclear families of the ancient Middle East where strict religious law was paramount and where the dreary succession of domestic hovels was relieved only by cemeteries. Towns in the Holy Land had no stadia, amphitheatres or gymnasia, at least not until they were introduced into Judea by Antiochus Epiphanes and Herod during the eastern expansion of the Roman Empire.

“Wood is used along with this humble material [i.e. mud], but stone very rarely. Perhaps ancient Jewish towns and villages, in the same way, may have had more wood used in their construction than would be possible at present, when building-timber is practically unknown in the country; but neither wood nor mud bricks have elements of permanence. The 'tells,' or mounds, which mark the site of old Jewish communities, have, moreover, precisely the appearance of similar mounds now forming around, or, one might say, beneath, existing mud-brick villages in India and Egypt...The road runs nearly straight north, at the foot of the hills, which are frequently dotted with villages, almost undistinguishable from the soil around, because of the leaden colour of the mud huts.” Cunningham Geikie THE HOLY LAND AND THE BIBLE (1887).

It was this tedious pattern of urban living that was later used as a model for Calvin's Geneva and Cromwell's England.

ROME AND THE NORTH

The notion of shared space was by no means confined to the Greeks. Romans, with their Hellenic heritage and the addition of baths and forums, imposed their version of an open society across the rest of Europe. The northern tribes of Celts and Germans however were familiar with this outdoor lifestyle. They had already developed their own public assemblies (the Thing) and Tacitus describes their main entertainment, “They have only one kind of public show, which is performed without variation at every festive gathering. Naked youths, trained to the sport, dance about among swords and spears levelled at them. Practice begets skill, and skill grace; but they are not professionals and do not receive payment. Their most daring flings have their own reward in the pleasure they give the spectators.”

At Yeavering in Northumberland the Seventh Century royal complex included a grandstand, “enlarged once by the addition of further tiers at the back, which doubled its seating capacity. The nearest comparable structures are the stone theatres of the Roman world and it would seem to represent a small section of such a theatre constructed entirely in wood.” Martin Welch, ANGLO-SAXON ENGLAND (English Heritage 1992).

MEAD HALLS

Through the hall then went the Helmings' Lady,
to younger and older everywhere
carried the cup, till come the moment
when the ring-graced queen, the royal-hearted,
to Beowulf bore the beaker of mead.
- Beowulf

Naturally the cooler climate of northern Europe was not so conducive to this open lifestyle as that of the Mediterranean, but our ancestors managed to overcome these limitations with the development of the mead hall. Mead in the early Middle Ages was a very different drink from the innocuous concoction we are familiar with today. It was the “mead of inspiration”, mythologically rescued from the Giants by Odin, and mixed with such hallucinogenics as henbane, cannabis or magic mushrooms.

Mead halls were not just men-only affairs; myths, legends and the historical record testify to the presence of women in the halls. The halls were a single large building, often over 50m long, comprising of just one room, which had been developing in northern Europe since the late neolithic period.

VALKYRIES AND BRASSY BARMAIDS

The custom of having women serving the drinks was set by divine precedent as demonstrated in this description of Valhalla: “The valkyries lead the slain heroes (the Einherjar) to this hall, to Odin, and they serve them with meat from the boar Saehrimnir. Everyone has enough to eat from the boar, which renews itself constantly. The Einherjar drink mead with this meal which flows from the udders of the goat, Heidrun.” Rudolf Simek DICTIONARY OF NORTHERN MYTHOLOGY (1993).

On the mortal plane of Midgard, women were expected not just to serve the drinks, but also to join in the celebrations. “The earl [Arnvid] gave them a hearty welcome when they arrived and showed them into a hall where there was ale ready on the table. They were served with drink and sat there till evening. Before the tables were cleared, the earl said that seating arrangements must be decided by lot, and that each of the men should have a woman as drinking partner, as long as there were enough women. After that, the rest of the men were to drink on their own.” EGIL'S SAGA

The powerful and enduring archetype of the female hostess is reflected in the more mundane “ale-wives” who managed London taverns from the Thirteenth Century onward. Flick on any English TV soap opera today, and they still maintain their pride of place behind the bar of the Queen Vic and Rover's Return, though sadly without their gleaming armour.

Involution, Evolution, Consciousness and Western Destiny

2007-02-18T06:04:00.000-08:00

While eastern Aryan religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism and Sufism to some extent have followed a path of spiritual evolution through detachment, the European Aryan worldview is more a process of involution. Whereas Indians etc. have chosen to ignore the material world and taken this rejection to the extreme of describing the outside world as “Maya” - illusion - we have (from the Ancient Greeks onwards) forced our consciousness into previously inanimate objects.

We have “involved” ourselves in matter. Of course the route we have chosen is extremely hazardous, with the danger that we become trapped in materialism without appreciating higher values, but the benefits are enormous. I wonder if because of our nature western civilization was pre-destined to undergo this “fall” into matter, a process which accelerated after the scientific and industrial revolutions in Europe (i.e. what Julius Evola calls modernism).

If so, then for me the only meaningful course is to continue with our involution into matter until we have “broken through”, perhaps by Faster-Than-Light travel or some other technological means, to another “spiritual” realm. We already know from quantum mechanics that solid matter is far less solid than previously suspected; I think this could have been our civilization's initial step upward from the Nineteenth Century nadir of perception of a purely mechanical, dead universe.

Complexity

The Eastern path of spiritual evolution may be premature, at least for us Europeans. Eastern and Western philosophy concur that once an entity reaches a sufficient level of complexity it can experience human-like consciousness. Instead of reflecting on what already is, we in the west have projected this complexity into nature and experimentation, thereby creating an unprecedented control over matter. Yet we welcome more challenges. Our scientific and technological impulse toward creativity shows no sign of abating.

For us, materialism is not the evolutionary “dead end” as it is so often described in esoteric writing; instead it is our road to becoming something more than human.

Homo Economicus

2007-02-10T08:33:00.000-08:00

“The nearest buildings were almost two miles away, and formed a low belt completely surrounding the Park. Beyond them, rank after rank in ascending height, were the towers and terraces that made up the main bulk of the city. They stretched for mile upon mile, slowly climbing up the sky, becoming ever more complex and monumentally impressive. Diaspar had been planned as an entity; it was a single mighty machine. Yet though its outward appearance was almost overwhelming in its complexity, it merely hinted at the hidden marvels of technology without which all these great buildings would be lifeless sepulchres.” - THE CITY AND THE STARS. Arthur C. Clarke (1956)

Wealth has concentrated in the hands of the very few, but I reckon that Marx's explanation is only a part of the story, and I don't believe in the inevitability of class war; there are other forces at work in addition:

Wealth trajectory westward

“Brooks Adams also noted that centralized capital (the accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few inter-related families) seems to have been moving steadily West throughout recorded history. The first major accumulations are to be found in Sumer; the center of money-power then shifted to Egypt, to Greece, to the Italian peninsula, to various parts of Germany, and then to London. At the time Brooks Adams was writing (c.1900) he saw the balance teetering between London and New York, and he predicted that the decline of the English Empire would shift the balance to New York within the first half of the 20th Century. Brooks Adams had no theory as to why this Westward movement of wealth had been going on for 6000 years. He merely observed the pattern.
“The shift is still continuing, in the opinion of many. For instance, Carl Oglesby in The Cowboy vs. Yankee War, sees American politics since 1950 dominated by a struggle between 'old Yankee wealth' (the New York-Boston axis, which replaced London after 1900) and 'new cowboy wealth' (Texas-California oil-and-aerospace billionaires).” - PROMETHEUS RISING. Robert Anton Wilson (1983).

Since the 80s, Wilson and others have argued that the concentration of wealth has continued it's westward journey, crossing the Pacific to Japan and China but at the same time apparently vanishing into cyberspace.

Corporatism and Distributism

Both these theories emerged in the late Nineteenth Century as the Catholic Church's response to socialism, and I agree that both are superior (fairer and more efficient) than liberal capitalism.

Corporatism can vary from the very mild, e.g. Britain's Labour government in the late 1970s, to the idealistic full-blooded variety espoused by Alexander Raven Thomson.

“No greater mistake can be made than to regard the Corporate State as a mere mechanism of administration.
“On the contrary, it is the organic form through which the nation can find expression. Fascism is no material creed like Communism, which sets up, as its only purpose, the material benefit of the masses. Fascism is essentially idealistic, and refuses any such limitation. Fascism recognises the nation as an organism with a purpose, a life and means of action transcending those of the individuals of which it is composed.
“...it is only through co-operation with others in the organic purpose of the State that the individual can attain his highest potentiality. There is no need for any conflict between the individual and the State as neither can exist without the other. An individual exiled from the civilised communion must inevitably relapse into savagery: a State deprived of loyal co-operation with its citizens must inevitably collapse into barbarism.” - THE COMING CORPORATE STATE. Alexander Raven Thomson (1936)

Raven Thomson is describing a State with a Will. I believe that Will must be directed toward the conquest of space. All other considerations are secondary.

Automation

Growing up as a small boy in the Sixties, I vividly remember the excitement of the space race. I also remember the promise of greater automation, which would free our people from a life of drudgery and instead allow us to pursue our dreams. Like many other ideas from that scintillating decade the vision faded. It's true that less people now are involved in manufacturing – actually producing things – and the greater part of the workforce are employed in “services”, overwhelmingly financial services. We have swapped the workbench for the hot desk and office cubicle.

To my mind this is not an improvement, and I wondered who was to blame. I came to the conclusion that capitalism is essentially a control mechanism of the crudest kind; it pits each of us against all others (“the war of all against all”) in an apparent battle for survival that guarantees the preservation of an unchanging parasitical elite.

I am not an economist, which I reckon is a positive advantage because I don't accept the rules (e.g. supply and demand) upon which modern economics is based. Human behaviour is in the final analysis beyond reason and trying to make a science out of it is futile.

Also, the New Right encompasses a wide variety of economic models, from Norman Lowell's Might is Right Social Darwinism to Troy Southgate's devolved National Anarchism, so my views are not representative although they are close to Mosley's BUF policies in the 1930s. The reason why the New Right is able to hold such contradictory economic policies is because ideologically economics occupies a rather lowly rung. In Georges Dumezil's tri-partite theory of Aryan civilization, economics is “third function” (almost a natural process); whereas real politics is confined to first and second functions only.

My own economic ideas are driven by three major concerns: the necessity to maintain a technological civilization and expand into space, environmental pollution, and the general welfare of all our people in order that they can contribute fully to the Imperium. In all this it differs drastically with Marxism.

In regard to pollution/ climate change etc. I believe the best solution is along the lines of Paolo Soleri's Arcologies, where our industrial/ technological activity is effectively sealed off from the rest of the planet. These Arcologies would be very high density and imply the possibility of communal living; barracks, canteens – a bit like WW2 underground military bases – but not so gloomy. We would make huge economies of scale, and at the same time cut transport costs to virtually nil. For the few that want to try communal, organic communities, there's the land around the Arcologies to use, otherwise it will be allowed to revert to wilderness. All food for the Arcology would be produced in factories in the Arcology, and as a technological civilization (in contrast to that envisaged by Blood & Soil/ back-to-the-land enthusiasts) we would be able to defend ourselves against invasion.

It's bonkers to assume that all this can come about through the free market, let alone space exploration which has always demanded massive state funding, so I concluded that a self-sufficient planned economy is best. This command economy would have to embrace to whole of Europe, Russia and Siberia (at least) above all for racial/cultural reasons, but also because it is of sufficient extent, and with sufficient resources, to guarantee autarky.

“Men had built cities before, but never a city such as this. Some had lasted for centuries, some for millennia, before Time had swept away even their names. Diaspar alone had challenged Eternity, defending itself and all it sheltered against the slow attrition of the ages, the ravages of decay, and the corruption of rust.”

London in the Snow

2007-02-08T06:25:00.000-08:00

Global Warming: The Armageddon Option II

2007-02-08T04:17:00.000-08:00

Confirmation that the scientific speculation in the essay below is sound:
www.sciencenews.org

SUDDEN CHILL
Even a limited nuclear exchange could trigger a climate catastrophe

"In the 1980s, scientists estimated that a war in which each superpower used half its nuclear arsenal would have destroyed the upper atmosphere's ozone layer and, by filling the skies with dust and smoke, decreased temperatures at ground level in some regions as much as 40°C for up to a decade. Scientists and antinuclear advocates dubbed this chilling result nuclear winter."

Global Warming: The Armageddon Option

2007-01-23T05:45:00.000-08:00

Once again I was left with a profound sense of despair after watching another report about climate change and global warming (David Attenborough, BBC4 Saturday).

Of course, there is one way to solve the problem immediately: a devastating NUCLEAR ATTACK on ALL centres of POPULATION/ INDUSTRY, worldwide. Does anyone else think that the Global Elite (however you define them) may already have something like this in mind? After all, they are the ones in a position to create bolt-holes for themselves and their families, in the mountains maybe, with supplies of food, technology and ammunition to last centuries.

Such a scenario would be horrendous for us, but would the decades of nuclear fall-out be any worse than the thousands (possibly millions) of years of climate super-heating that we are on course for creating by carrying on with business-as-usual over the next few years?

The onset of Nuclear Winter (Fimbulwinter in Germanic mythology) following such a nuclear armageddon would easily be enough to reverse global warming, and afterwards there would be virtually no-one left to re-start a polluting, industrial civilization. The Elite wouldn't need that anyway as they already have everything they want for their luxurious lifestyles. They could easily crush any promising post-apocalyptic civilization. Meanwhile the most environmentally-threatened areas of the planet (e.g. the Arctic, the Amazon) would be reprieved.

All the evidence suggests that global consumer capitalism and western liberal democracy are not up to the challenge facing us now. Bush, Brown, Blair and the rest are still apparently devoted to economic growth and more material choice, as are the vast majority of the rest of us in the west.

The only hope for us ordinary mortals in Europe is a radical rejection of the status quo, and its replacement with limits and rationing; a socialist, command economy and above all a rediscovery of the eternal Spirit of Europe and European elan. In short, the ideology of Aryan Futurism and the European New Right. A hundred years ago Georges Sorel identified the importance of myth in motivating the masses; what better myth is there for us than the true story of Aryan survival, evolution, ingenuity and advancement? Other races/cultures (notably China) have their own myths to draw on.

As anyone who has read my Aryan Futurism manifesto will know, I am not anti-technology (quite the opposite, I believe our destiny is amongst the stars), but such a happy prospect is impossible while we continue to be seduced by the tawdry baubles of consumerism, and blinded or indifferent to the consequences.

New Right Ninth London Meeting

2007-01-15T09:09:00.000-08:00

On Saturday 13th January 2007 the NEW RIGHT staged its 9th meeting in Central London. There were more than 60 people in attendance and the speakers were as follows:

*1.00pm-1.45pm:
Dr. SAHIB BLEHER (Islamic Party of Britain)
Islam: Outdated Oriental Religion or Visionary Ideology of the Future?

*2.15pm-3.00pm:
WULF (Woden's Folk)
The Power of the Runes

*3.30-4.30pm:
LADY MICHELE RENOUF
Jailing Opinions

*5.00pm-6.00pm:
JONATHAN BOWDEN (New Right)
Robinson Jeffers: Misanthrope Extraordinaire

Thanks again to everyone for coming along and making the event such a huge success. Please help us publicise the continuing growth of the NEW RIGHT by sending this bulletin to as many mainstream and alternative media sources as you can.

New Right, BM Box LCRN, London WC1N 3XX, England.
arktoslondon-at-yahoo-dot-co-dot-uk
www.new-right.org
- Troy Southgate

Boycott Halal/ Kosher Outlets

2007-01-06T02:21:00.000-08:00

All three intolerant, monotheistic Abrahamic religions are alien and deserve the same fate in Europe.

As a first step, we could initiate an organized homosexual boycott of halal/ kosher outlets.

We would show firstly that we will have nothing to do with these barbaric ritual slaughter customs, and also that we are opposed to the alien homophobia that they are bringing to our shores. As a pagan and a follower of modern science, I believe that animals have a consciousness, and also that they experience pain. I am disgusted that we still allow these cruel practices in our lands.

I was not surprised to learn that when our pagan European ancestors (Greeks, Romans etc.) performed a sacrifice, they would first stun the opfer with a blow to the head so it would lose consciousness immediately. This is the same method still used in modern slaughterhouses, because vets say it is humane. As I understand it, ritual slaughter requires that the animal is still conscious when it has its throat slit and is left to bleed to death, which I find abhorrent, especially when it is condoned in my own country.

By making the boycott public, open and organized, we will show that we object not just to their dietary habits, but also to the homophobia encouraged by their intolerant monotheistic religions.
Christians don't tend to have special dietary requirements, and the only Christian shop I know (apart from the charity shops) is the one that sells rosaries by Westminster Cathedral.

Exclusively halal/ kosher outlets include far more than butchers and corner-shops. They can be take-aways, restaurants, cafes or grocers. We should make all of them out-of-bounds, until they change their ideas.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2977086.stm

Magna Europa est Patria Nostra!
Delenda est Carthago!

Stonewall and Free Speech

2006-12-05T13:50:00.000-08:00

The following is an answer to Stonewall's support for the proposed “offence of incitement to hatred on grounds of sexual orientation”. Stonewall is the British equivalent of the USA's National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF):

Does anyone else object to Stonewall's latest attempt to curb free speech?

Unless statements can be construed as DIRECT incitements to violence or murder (e.g. “see that bunch of queers over there – go and beat them up”), they should remain legal.

The great British public aren't so stupid as to believe everything they're told from the pulpit. Christians and Muslims should be allowed to spout off whatever bullshit they like...it only adds to the impression that they are foolish bigots!

As homosexuals we must be robust, and demonstrate that we are FOR free thought and free expression. We don't need to hide behind the hem of the nanny state, crying “unfair! - send for the lawyers” every time some crackpot takes a verbal pop at us. History teaches how easily similar laws can be used against us.

Stonewall are jumping onto the PC bandwagon just at the time when it's running into the ditch. People in this country are realizing that we've had enough of being gagged. All so-called Hate Laws should be scrapped.

The easiest way to level the playing pitch is by scrapping all laws which privilege certain identifiable groups (i.e. the very essence of multicultural theory): it would mean dis-establishment of the Church of England, scrapping the blasphemy laws (which favour Christians), reversing the Incitement to Religious Hatred and Race Relations Acts, abandoning talks with unrepresentative so-called “community leaders” and dropping harsher sentences for crimes deemed “racially-motivated”. Violent crime is violent crime, and should be judged by the level of injury inflicted, not by how much the thuggish perpetrator identifies (or not) with the multicultural shibboleth.

My greatest fear with what Stonewall are proposing is that it will allow Jews, Christians and Muslims to portray us homosexuals as an intolerant, unpopular minority (the opposite of the truth) determined to impose our 'degenerate' morality on the general population. In Scandinavia, bigoted vicars have already been turned into martyrs and been locked up for giving sermons.

Religious zealots will jump with joy if the legal status of certain passages in the Bible (Leviticus), Koran and Hadith become problematic. Ironically, it will provide them with the perfect opportunity for further proselytizing, and at the same time run us down.

More generally, the proposed legislation plays right into the hands of the greedy elite whose policy has always been 'divide and rule'. There is nothing they fear more than a united, clear-seeing, determined population. We must make sure that we are a part of that forward movement, and not allow ourselves to become separated out from our fellows.

Using Runes: Starting

2006-11-26T11:14:00.000-08:00

Runes were the first comprehensive script used by the peoples of central and northern Europe. They are accessible to all who share this inheritance, and who approach the Runes with the right attitude.

The original 24-Rune Futhark was developed, probably from a combination of Etruscan, Greek, Italic and early Germanic symbols, around 250bce. In Norse mythology the god Odin is credited with the discovery of the Runes after being hanged on the World Tree for a period of 9 days. 'Futhark' has the same meaning as 'alphabet' and is constructed in a similar manner, using the initial sounds of the first 6 Runes. The Anglo-Saxons later added a further 9 Runes, while the Scandinavians eventually cut the number down to 16. At the beginning of the Twentieth Century a German called Guido von List invented an 18-rune Futhark known as the Armanen Futhark. It was this Armanen Futhark that was later appropriated by the Third Reich. Since it has no archaeological validity, it is beyond the scope of this essay. The 24-Rune 'Elder Furthark' is the earliest Futhark, was used for the longest time-period, and is considered the standard today.

The traditional tripartition of the 24 runes is: FEHU to WUNJO = first aett; HAGALAZ to SOWILO = second aett; TIWAZ to OTHALA = third aett. 'Aett' simply means 'group of eight' and each group is traditionally ruled over by different male and female cosmic forces, in accordance with George Dumezil's tri-functional hypothesis of Aryan mythology and culture.

It is always best to make your own Runes, rather than relying on commercially manufactured Runes. This is easy to do, whether on wood (as is traditional), stone, bone or metal.

Time

Sometimes the last two runes (DAGAZ and OTHALA) are swapped around, especially when the runes are used for measuring time, so that DAGAZ is the last rune - marking mid-day. If you want to use the runes as a clock, then the runes follow each other on the half-hour, starting with FEHU (12:30-13:30), then URUZ (13:30-14:30) and so on, until DAGAZ (11:30-12:30); so that the middle of the “hour-glass” shape of the DAGAZ Runestave marks mid-day exactly.

Mid-day is to the day as mid-Summer is to the year, so you can also use the runes as a calendar, with the central point of DAGAZ indicating mid-Summer, and the central break of JERA marking the Winter Solstice. The rest of the runes, each lasting for a period of just over a fortnight, can be plotted around these two dates. Notice how the Winter runes – HAGALAZ (hail); NAUTHIZ (need); ISA (ice) and EIHWAZ (yew – an evergreen) crowd around the coldest time of year. The same is true with the other runes: SOWILO (sunshine) and BERKANO (birch-tree) in Spring; GEBO (gift) and WUNJO (joy) at harvest-time. Uncanny, isn't it? We can only hope that seasonal changes due to climate change don't knock these correspondences out of kilter.

Rune Poems and the Esoteric Meaning of the Runes

Our main sources for the esoteric understanding of the Runes are the Anglo-Saxon, Old Norwegian and Old Icelandic Rune poems. The two latter Rune poems are based on the Scandinavian 16-Rune 'Younger Futhark', hence the apparent gaps in the verses. Each of the Rune-poems could be nothing more than mnemonics (“A is for apple” etc.), although that's unlikely, given their consistency, internal logic and spiritual resonance.

Some people interpret the Runes depending on whether the facing Rune is upside down or not, but there is no evidence in the traditional literature that Rune-casters, or 'Erulians', took any notice of the directions of individual staves when casting the Runes. It's most likely an innovation taken from tarot cards, so can be safely ignored. Even worse, some modern Rune-sets include a “blank-rune”, also taken from non-Germanic fortune-telling techniques. This is an abomination, which should be stamped out! The word 'Erulian' is from the Germanic Heruli tribe, who are believed to have spread knowledge of the Runes across Europe and who practiced ritual homosexuality.

There is enough to learn from Runes: times, seasons, and in particular and most interestingly the roots of words (e.g. 'Fee' and 'Feudalism', 'Fee, Fi, Fo, Fum' from FEHU; ur – meaning 'proto' in German, or 'first', from URUZ etc.), and concepts that were important to our ancestors in an agriculturally-based society, without getting into the whole esoteric stuff.

This is how I think the Runes can initially best be used – as a link to understanding the past and a stimulus for the creative imagination – rather than for tawdry magic. At their best they express eternal patterns within the European mind, Jung's archetypes if you will, and should be contemplated poetically.

Candle in the Wind

2006-11-13T05:38:00.000-08:00

Elton John suggests a ban of organized religion (Observer, November 12 2006 http://music.guardian.co.uk/pop/story/0,,1942541,00.html).

I'm not so sure that even banning organized religion, drastic though the consequences may be, will solve the problem of religious hatred and homophobia.

After all, Islam and to a lesser extent Christianity are notoriously DISorganized religions, to the extent that they were/ are quite happy to kill members of their own faith for “heresy”, let alone us fags. Protestants and Catholics may have declared a cease-fire in Europe, but the same cannot be said for Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims in Asia, and increasingly over here.

Our cringing, politically correct (at home, though not overseas) government is regularly criticized by Muslims for talking to “representatives” of other, “wrong” groups of Muslims. I almost pity John Reid, Ruth Kelly and the rest for trying to sort out the mess that they themselves have created, by leaving our borders open to mass third world immigration. It seems that however much they try, and talk, and bend over backwards to appease, Home Office ministers just never get it right. How can those that muddled, exasperated multiculturalists attempt to mollify be in any sense described as “organized”?

I reckon the problem (and their problem with homosexuality) goes far deeper; to the nature of Semitic monotheism itself: the willingness to accept revealed Truth, incontestable sacred scriptures and “chosen races”. These true-believers can, and do, fragment into smaller and smaller groupings – with each groupuscule claiming a monopoly on Truth – yet individually they remain as homophobic and ridiculous as ever. By abandoning reason for faith, they surrender their capacity to evolve.

Ego Death, Destiny and Serpents in Germanic Mythology

2006-11-05T13:14:00.000-08:00

These observations of stories from Germanic mythology are written with reference to Michael Hoffman's ENTHEOGEN THEORY OF RELIGION AND EGO DEATH, http://egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm where the snake or serpent is seen as a symbol of the stream of consciousness (“frozen-time determinism” in Hoffman's EGO DEATH language), and also as a pointer to the entheogenic substance aiding that symbolic realization.

According to Hoffman's EGO DEATH site, “Time can be envisioned as a space-like dimension, forming a block universe [a cube] that includes frozen, unchanging, snake-shaped personal worldline threads, each snake or thread representing a person's entire subjective stream of thoughts during their entire life (Ruckner 1984).” In this sense, the snake can be imagined as fulfilling the same function as the threads drawn by the Norns (the three fates/ Weird Sisters) of Northern myth. It is the “Necessity” expressed by the tenth rune, 'Nauthiz'.

There are three stories from Germanic mythology of particular relevance and resonance to the concept of EGO DEATH and the serpent: that of Jormungandr (the World Serpent), Loki's punishment and, above all, Odin's transformation into a snake in order to obtain the Odroerir – the Mead of the Skalds – which he then returns to Asgard.

1. Jormungandr – the World (Midgard) Serpent

Jormungandr is one of the three monster-offspring of Loki and the giantess Angrboda (“the bringer of grief”; their other two offspring being the Frenris wolf and Hel, the goddess representative of the underworld). The first two monsters are essential to the story of the final unfolding of Ragnarok, while Baldr's release from Hel after Ragnarok allows the sun god to rule over a shining new world. The most famous story about Jormungandr is when Thor goes fishing with a giant into the middle of the ocean, in order to catch and kill the earth-girdling snake. His voyage is a failure. He finally succeeds in slaying the Midgard serpent during Ragnarok, but at the cost of his own life.

2. Loki in the Snake-Pit

Loki is punished by the gods (for having brought about the death of Baldr) by being bound to a rock in a cavern. Above him Skadi, the goddess of hunting, has placed a venomous snake, and Loki writhes in agony, causing earthquakes, whenever the poison touches his skin. The parallels with other bound giants in Aryan mythology, notably Prometheus, are striking. Prometheus is another cultural hero and inventor, like Loki. Interestingly in this context, Goethe's Prometheus is made to exclaim to Mercury, “Did they [the divine parents of Prometheus] protect my heart/ From serpents that secretly tormented it!/ Did they steel my breast/ To defy the Titans?/...Was I not forged into a man/ By all-powerful Time/ And eternal Fate,/ My masters and yours?”

3. Odin and Odroerir

In the story of Odin and the winning of the Odroerir, snakes and entheogens are directly linked. According to Edred Thorsson in RUNELORE (Weiser, 1987), “In the guise of Bolverkr (Worker of Evil) and by cunning and oath-breaking, he gains access to the mountain where an etin-wife, Gunnlodh, guards the mead. He bores his way into the mountain in the shape of a serpent [actually the bore-hole is created by the Baugi the giant, Odin merely slips through as a snake] and remains in the interior for three nights, sleeping with the etin, after which he gets to drink down the mead in three gulps from the three vessels – Odhroerir, Son and Bodhn – in which the mead was held. Then he shape-shifts into an eagle and flies out of the top of the mountain and back to Asgardhr, where he spits out the mead into three vats – thus returning the mead to its rightful place among the Aesir and humanity. It is specifically stated that some of the mead dropped to the earth when Odhinn flew away, and this anyone can drink (if she or he happens across it by accident). Thus, it is called the 'fool-poet's share'.
“This myth is vital to runic tradition..It describes the path of becoming, the pathway of transformational Odianism...Here is hidden the significance of the serpentine aspect of the Odhinic cult, well-known from snake-bands on runestones and the famous dragon ships of the Vikings.”

From the traditional literature, the Eddas, we know that Odin uses three paths in his eternal quest for knowledge; insights that he hopes will allow him to defy destiny at Ragnarok. The first leads to his sacrifice on the World Tree and discovery of runes. Along the second he drinks from the Well of Mimir or Urd's Well, for which he pledged one of his eyes, (in the Voluspa, Mimir the Rememberer is said to drink the mead Odroerir from the Well every day). Third, through the mead Odroerir itself, created by the dwarves and won by Odin from the giants, as described by Edred Thorsson in the story above.

“The name Odroerir is sometimes used [in the Eddas and Germanic mythology generally] for the cauldron containing the mead of inspiration and sometimes for the mead itself. It means 'ecstasy-inducing,' or as we might say “ecstatogenic,” with the same word-root as Odin, god of inspiration and ecstasy. Since Odin was also said to drink mead from Odroedir when he came down from the World Tree after discovering the runes, this visionary mead is involved in all three of Odin's paths to knowledge.” - Ralph Metzner, THE WELL OF REMEMBRANCE

As with all myths, these can be interpreted on a number of levels. For instance the Arktion Federation published in its journal an explanation of Jormungandr as being a description of the water cycle. It could equally be the carbon cycle.

The three stories outlined above are amongst the most popular and recurrent motifs in northern pagan art. They are also inextricably bound up with the idea of the fate of the individual and the world.

Terror at the threshold of awareness

As Hoffman mentions in his EGO DEATH article, and as anyone who has experienced salvia divinorum or an LSD bad trip will know, the experience of entheogen-induced awareness of ego-loss and pre-destination can be disconcerting at best, and at worst a shattering of cosmic order from which it appears impossible to recover. At its best, it is humbling and ennobling, but when tainted with either physical or mental impurities it becomes an ordeal ending in a crushing nihilism.

Bad Trips, H.P. Lovecraft

“Saturn, as governor or gatekeeper of the outermost [ancient] planetary sphere which is associated with the sphere of the fixed stars, rides in a serpent-drawn chariot and eats the child or youthful self-concept as the price of passage across the boundary into the transcendent heavens beyond the starry Heimarmene[Fate]-boundary.” - Hoffman, EGO DEATH

“Both ego-less animal existence and man's ego, which is but matrical sensory cognition, originate in the same Matrix of Dream. This must be transcended. It is Polar insight, the inward-looking way that leads out of this cyclic Matrix. However, the man's ego, being the man-god, fears mystical dissolution, because it fears its “death”. Only if “death” is realized as illusion by experiencing it mystically in life, can essencification and spiritual unity be achieved. The ego fears “death” because it does not know that there is none. 'Fear' is the sword the ego wields, yet its iron melts away in the black heat of Wisdom.
“In Lovecraft's stories the elements of decay and death prevail. These are the emotional patterns of one approaching...The transformative Way across the Bridge of Fog, from animal-man to god-man, is painful. Everyone claiming the contrary, is speaking with a Minotaurian voice.
The Way leads through the Tomb of the Individual toward the Emergence of the Entity. The same is applicable to humanity. Saturn is throwing its charnel light toward this planet. But the Pilgrim must know that Saturn is but the Threshold, not the Destination.” W.H. Muller - Polaria p113

The Minotaurian voice that Muller refers to is the voice that asserts the supremacy of the ego. It is the animal-man trapped in the labyrinth of ordinary, uninspired consciousness.

Dialectics, Non-dual Synthesis and Tantra

It is interesting that these processes are always tripartite; EGO DEATH itself is a 3-stage process: ordinary consciousness is expanded by entheogens to an appreciation of frozen-time determinism (block universe) and the hidden transcendent control of thoughts, then to non-dualism: the non-dualism conveyed by Advaita Vedanta in Hinduism, the Diamond Sutra in Buddhism or Meister Eckhart and Georg Hegel in post-Christian Germanic tradition. “3-stage initiation paths centred around determinism are often posed as 2-stage systems: they both endorse and disparage the realization of determinism, which is the intermediate destination on the path to salvific regeneration” - Hoffman.

“...India was to be credited for the the ideal of liberation and the West was to be credited for the ideal of liberty. On the one hand, there is there is the impulse to escape from the human condition in order to become reintegrated in an absolute from which we separated ourselves only to end up in a world of illusion (maya). On the other hand, there is the impulse to feel free in a world that is no longer denied, but that is rather considered as a field for action and for experiencing all of the possibilities inherent in the human condition...In Tantrism we find a very interesting phenomenon; those ascetic techniques that were well-known in India are no longer employed to achieve an otherworldly liberation but in order to achieve liberty within the world. These techniques are supposed to bestow on a superior human type an invulnerability that allows one to be open to every worldly experience and that grants the power 'to transform the poison into medicine'.” - Julius Evola, THE YOGA OF POWER

Evola suggests a possible resolution of the mundane-consciousness belief in free will, and the heightened-consciousness awareness of predestination: through Tantra. Hoffman's “salvific regeneration” could then be understood as the Tantric moment of realization of non-duality; there is no “other” that sets the universe and the individual on a pre-destined course. Odin is still on the road to Ragnarok, Thor is still destined to be overwhelmed by the World Serpent, while Loki is fated to escape his own serpentine tormentor and unleash Ragnarok. But none of these events have yet taken place: the final battle between Odin as questing consciousness and the snake as inexorable fate remains unresolved.

http://egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm

Dr. Tomislav Sunic on Paganism

2006-10-30T13:00:00.000-08:00

Can we still conceive of the revival of Pagan sensibility in an age
so profoundly saturated by Judeo-Christian monotheism and so
ardently adhering to the tenets of liberal democracy? In popular
parlance the very word "Paganism" may incite some to derision and
laughter. Who, after all, wants to be associated with witches and
witchcraft, with sorcery and black magic? Worshiping animals or
plants, or chanting hymns to Wotan or Zeus, in an epoch of cable
television and "smart weapons," does not augur well for serious
intellectual and academic inquiry. Yet, before we begin to heap
scorn on Paganism, we should pause for a moment. Paganism is not
just witches and witches' brew; Paganism also means a mix of highly
speculative theories and philosophies. Paganism is Seneca and
Tacitus; it is an artistic and cultural movement that swept over
Italy under the banner of the Renaissance. Paganism also means
Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Charles Darwin, and a host of
other thinkers associated with the Western cultural heritage. Two
thousand years of Judeo-Christianity have not obscured the fact that
Pagan thought has not yet disappeared, even though it has often been
blurred, stifled, or persecuted by monotheistic religions and their
secular offshoots...Abraham and Moses may be dethroned today, but
their moral edicts and spiritual ordinances are much alive. The
global and disenchanted world, accompanied by the litany of human
rights, ecumenical society, and the rule of law ---- are these not
principles that can be traced directly to the Judeo-Christian
messianism that resurfaces today in its secular version under the
elegant garb of modern "progressive" ideologies?

And yet, we should not forget that the Western world did not begin
with the birth of Christ. Neither did the religions of ancient
Europeans see the first light of the day with Moses-in the desert.
Nor did our much-vaunted democracy begin with the period of
Enlightenment or with the proclamation of American independence.
Democracy and independence-all of this existed in ancient Greece,
albeit in its own unique social and religious context. Our Greco-
Roman ancestors, our predecessors who roamed the woods of central
and northern Europe, also believed in honor, justice, and virtue,
although they attached to these notions a radically different
meaning...

Who knows, with the death of communism, with the exhaustion of
liberalism, with the visible depletion of the congregations in
churches and synagogues, we may be witnessing the dawn of
neopaganism, a new blossoming of old cultures, a return to the roots
that are directly tied to our ancient European precursors. Who can
dispute the fact that Athens was the homeland of Europeans before
Jerusalem became their frequently painful edifice?

Great lamenting is heard from all quarters of our disenchanted and
barren world today. Gods seem to have departed, as Nietzsche
predicted a century ago, ideologies are dead, and liberalism hardly
seems capable of providing man with enduring spiritual support.
Maybe the time has come to search for other paradigms? Perhaps the
moment is ripe, as Alain Benoist would argue, to envision another
cultural and spiritual revolution-a revolution that might well
embody our pre-Christian European Pagan heritage?

-- Dr. Tomislav Sunic
TOMISLAV SUNIC is the author of AGAINST DEMOCRACY AND EQUALITY: The European New Right (Newport Beach, CA. Noontide Press 1990/2004) ISBN 0-939482-63-0
http://doctorsunic.netfirms.com/
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/tomsunic/index.html
http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=64

Economic Logic

2006-10-09T05:58:00.000-07:00

Yet another bunch of economic boffins, this time in Barcelona, have told us mugs that European national economies (in this instance the Spanish) cannot survive and prosper without a further massive influx of third world immigrants (BBC World Service report, 7 October 2006).

Their deliberations beg the question of what a national economy is actually for? Is it to keep the native population in a reasonable standard of living, or is it to act solely as a cog for the enrichment of the parasitical cosmopolitan elite who control the decadent New World Order?

The word “economy” is ultimately from Ancient Greek, and meant nothing more than “household management”. If a household contracts, then it will require less resources. It doesn't need to bring in extra lodgers to boost some spurious standard of living and destructive “economic growth”. In particular it doesn't need lodgers who are antagonistic to the values of the pre-existing household members.

The same bulletin contained a later item about the current drastic reduction of blue-finned tuna in the Mediterranean, due to over-fishing. So what are all these new immigrants going to eat? Spain, according to reliable climate-change scientists, is likely to be hit hard by escalating drought, so they can't rely on the land to provide an adequate food supply. And they won't be able to rely on imports when other countries and continents face droughts and other consequences of global warming even more dire than those faced by Spain.

In my “Aryan Futurism” essay (see below) I describe how we Europeans can provide enough food for ourselves in future, and much more, despite climate change, but the model demands a radical re-think of current economic received opinion. It demands a pan-continental, sustainable, command economy managed by the IMPERIUM. The moribund policies of the free-marketeers in Barcelona and elsewhere need to be scrapped because they won't work anyway.

Mind Your Language

2006-10-07T03:50:00.000-07:00

The expression “appropriate language” is an example of the standard, thoughtless and vacuous language we have all been encouraged to speak over the past 30 years or so. It's exactly the sort of politically correct (cultural Marxist) “celebration of diversity” that makes us sound like prissy Victorian schoolmarms and which the indigenous population (young people in particular) are increasingly reacting against. For example, witness the riots this week in Windsor, or the largely unreported riots in Preston and further afield in Belgium. It is the language that forces us to describe ourselves in ugly, transitory acronyms (LGBT&T, anyone?) which are ultimately false because they lump us together with seemingly self-obsessed freaks to whom we have absolutely nothing in common.

Our country and continent are finally waking up to the unpleasant fact of how we have been betrayed by the treacherous elite who rule the West. As homosexuals we must ensure that we are not perceived as being on their loosing side; i.e. as being supporters of their multi-cultural mess, rather than a part of the solution. Especially when multi-culturalism works directly against our own best interests by pandering to such people as alien evangelical Christians and Muslims with their blood-curdling and irrational condemnations of homosexuality.

Sins (and Benefits) of Omission

2006-09-18T05:21:00.000-07:00

Because the Roman Catholic Church for so long kept the Mass in Latin and effectively discouraged the laity from reading the Bible, native forms in Europe were able to re-emerge during the early Medieval period and afterward. This is in contrast to the other monotheistic religions that have leaked from the Middle East: Judaism, Islam and Christian Protestantism.

Instead, by emphasizing post-Biblical revelation (Saints, Popes, the sacrament of the Mass in the here-and-now) the Roman Catholic Church stood by to allow the flowering of native European cultural forms, first with Medieval Gothic and later with the Renaissance and the revival of pagan art and thought in Florence, Venice, Rome and Antwerp.

Congratulations for a change to Pope Benedict XVI for telling it how it is in relation to the menace of Islam. The Pope recognizes the need for a monocultural Europe (albeit a Catholic culture) as part of a multicultural planet. If the Catholic Church were to drop the Bible completely then it could become a beacon for the future.

PARIS SHOCKWAVES

2006-08-26T04:50:00.000-07:00

Most gay men are familiar with the hagiography surrounding the 1969 Stonewall Riots in Manhattan, and many readers of this magazine are aware of the debt owed by Stonewall and Gay Liberation to the political and cultural upheavals of the late 60s, exemplified by Paris May ’68 and the birth of the New Left. But most homosexuals, particularly in Britain and America, do not know of a group founded in Paris during this turbulent time called GRECE (Groupement de Recherche et d’Etudes pour la Civilisation Europeenne). This group is the most significant intellectual current to have sprung during the evenements of Paris 1968, and destined to have an effect more world-shattering than Revolutionary Paris 1789. It stood in opposition, not just to the liberal-capitalist establishment, but also to the old Marxist and the then-emerging New Left. In this essay, I will outline some of the unique features of GRECE and its European New Right (ENR, also known as European Identitarian) successors, particularly some of the anti-monotheistic ideology it shares with humanism. I will also explain how homosexuals were gravely mistaken in ignoring the ENR and how instead the blandishments of the Gay-Liberationist-hucksters led us away from our Western civilization, our antecedents; Plato, Hadrian, Michelangelo and Tchaikovsky, turned our folk community into strangers, and deposited us in the heart of the enemy camp.

GRECE shared some of the concerns of the New Left; the danger of mass society, consumerism and environmental degradation, but this superficial agreement hid a yawning chasm between their fundamental positions. While the New Left maintained the fiction of “abstract man” (more on this below), the ENR followed the physical anthropologist Arnold Gehlen in asserting than man is a biocultural being: although culture and biology are two different things, in man they form an indivisible unity. Further, man can never be more than an individuated expression of his native culture. A man may escape his culture physically, through exile, but never in thought or spirit.

Judeo-Christianity

As with men, so with cultures. As in postmodern theory, civilizations are seen as unique and quite literally incomparable, because there is no common frame of reference by which to compare them. But unlike postmodernists, European identitarians believe that real cultures, like real individuals, are rooted in a particular location at a particular time, from which they grow organically. As with any set of cultures growing in a laboratory, random contact is far more likely to lead to contamination than cross-fertilization, and is best avoided. This is the ENR’s first major reason for objecting to Judeo-Christianity. The second major objection is that Judeo-Christianity is the product of a civilization especially hostile to our own.

“We come from the people of the Iliad and the Edda, not the Bible.”, so says Pierre Krebs of the German Thule-Seminar ENR organization. The usurpation of native philosophy and polytheism by alien monotheism has thwarted Europe’s ability to truly be itself – a condition Martin Heidegger has called inauthenticity. Homosexuals should be familiar with the idea of inauthenticity as it describes the condition of the closet. J. Edgar Hoover and Roy Cohn just were two closet-cases famously corrupted because of their inability to truly be themselves. The spiritual inauthenticity of our continent, argue some New Rightists, has resulted in pathological continental quests. First the Crusades into the Near East, western Europe’s first overseas kingdom, then the subjection of America while Europe tore herself apart in the religious wars of the Seventeenth Century, all driven by a Messianic monotheism.

That Europe had been so heavily influenced by alien religions was serious, that they were a product of Semitic civilization was, for Europe, a disaster. This is because of a formative difference between Indo-European and Semitic civilizations. Indo-European cultures originated within a warrior class, or Mannerbund, which imparted Martial values of truth, honour and beauty in the civilizations of Greece, Rome and the nations created by the Celts, Germans and Slavs. Semitic civilization, on the other hand, came from a domestic society of patriarchal nuclear families, governed primarily by material considerations. A clash of civilizations was inevitable when Hellenism, in the person of Alexander the Great, encroached eastward. Sexuality, along with art and philosophy was a front in this cultural war; the Greeks, with a high civilization descended from the Mannerbund, had a relaxed attitude toward homosexuality. For the Jews with their close-knit families and the diktats of their all-powerful god, this was anathema and something they could define themselves against. Into this closed, paranoid atmosphere Christianity was fostered, later introducing its mean homophobia to Rome.

Imperium

Describing itself as meta-political, the ENR has a broad range of themes apart from its anti-Judeo-Christianity. Most important of these is the idea of Imperium, a united Europe, including Russia, which could stretch to the Pacific (territorial extent varies amongst different New Right groups). This Imperium will not be achieved by military conquest but by nations voluntary opting-in. Above all, it’s political and social structure will follow a traditional pattern, based on the researches of Indo-Europeanists like Carl Jung, Georges Dumezil and Stephen Flowers, with the civilization of the Imperium trisected into complimentary functions: first function, leadership; second function, power and technics; third function, production.

This political structure is integral yet flexible. For instance, my own politics derives partly from the volunteerist State described in Robert Heinlein’s STARSHIP TROOPERS, with leaders (first function) elected by citizen volunteers (second function) who have elevated themselves from the producing and consuming mass (third function).

ENR thinkers agree that the Imperium should be polytheistic, autarkic, and that subsidiarity (appropriate local control) must be a major principle. The Imperium may be declared pagan, but free-thinking and the creative imagination will be paramount. Pagans have no “sacred scriptures” or “holy books” that contain the literal word of god, and to which they must sacrifice their powers of reasoning. My own cannon of “sacred books” is drawn from three millennia of Indo-European literature, from Homer and Virgil to the Grail legends, Marlowe, Shakespeare, Hegel, Darwin and Nietzsche (all the writers sneeringly referred to in Anglo-American academia as “Dead White Males”). Philosophical non-duality is an important Indo-European worldview, expressed in Hindu Vedanta, Classical Neo-Platonism and European Nineteenth Century Romanticism, and which undermines all religious absolutism.

Economics is considered by New Rightists at a lower, more materialistic and animalistic (i.e. third function) level than Politics. Distributism is proposed as a solution to global consumer capitalism, although my own preference is for an authoritarian socialist command economy.

Abstract Man

European Identitarians are not hostile to humanists or agnostics. Atheist Vikings were known and respected as “trua a matt sinn ok megin”, which means something along the lines of sufficient unto themselves, or relying on their own power, in Old Norse. Interestingly, the German Musculinist movement (see below) was to use a similar slogan in the Nineteenth Century, derived from the Anarchism of Max Stirner, and novelist Ernst Junger explored the concept in the Twentieth. The humanism of Marsilio Ficino, Botticelli and the Florentine Renaissance originated in Neo-Platonism. It is liberal humanism, the humanism developed by John Locke when his individualistic Protestantism combined with Descarte’s materialism, that the ENR has identified as the universal solvent which dissolves all cultural bonds. Like out-of-control nanobots in a sci-fi nightmare, liberalism threatens to render Earth’s diversity into an atomized, undifferentiated gloop.

John Locke formalized the two main pillars upon which liberalism rests, the Jachin and Boaz which support the temple to capitalist freemasonic individualism, where abstract man stands resplendent. The first principle was the idea of the supremacy of the individual human over everything else in nature. The second was that each individual is, initially at least, a “tabula rasa”, each man is born equally blank and equally interchangeable, like a widget.

Locke’s second principle is scientifically-demonstrable nonsense. Modern genetics and common sense have given short shrift to any lingering belief in a “tabula rasa”. Some European New Right thinkers have gone much further, daring to speculate on the possibility of inherited thought-processes and characteristics (what Michael Moynihan has called ‘meta-genetics’), and even how this could shed new light on traditional European beliefs such as re-incarnation. Meanwhile, in Anglo-American academia, “Queer Studies” professors are paid thousands to drone on about totally scientifically-discredited ideas of “social constructionism” derived from Derrida and Foucault, who in turn got their ideas from the discredited Marxist-Freudean Frankfurt School, themselves a major source of inspiration to the “Gay Liberationists” of the early 70s. Thus another circle is added to Hell, spiralling down the pit of the Kali Yuga, while the queer studies academics continue, like medieval scholars, to count the number of fairies they can fit on the end of a dildo.

As for Locke’s first principle: I would argue if there’s one thing in nature that’s greater than the individual, then it is a collective of individuals working for a common purpose and aspiring to a higher level of existence, what in common speech is called a civilization. If it’s a contest between me and what I know and can do, and Western civilization and what it knows and can do, Western civilization wins hands down. Everything I think and know is mediated by the fact that I belong to this particular civilization at this particular point in time, as Hegel, Heidegger and Gehlen have stated. This of course is the heart of the argument between liberals and the New Right; which has more legitimacy, the individual or the civilization? Liberals cling to the belief in an abstract man – Locke’s widget – who floats naked and free in space, transcending time and civilizations, but who carries with him a folio of Universal Human Rights. From whence this miraculous folio came, no-one asks. New European Rightists would say that it was thrust into his hand (or wherever) by Moses, Jesus, Rousseau, Voltaire, Locke, Hume and Adam Smith. “Abstract man” now at least has a secular trinity to whom he can genuflect: Ghandi, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela, with Princess Diana and Mary Robinson taking turns to hover in the background as the Virgin Mary.

Gay perversity

After the 1967 de-criminalization in the UK, homosexuals faced a choice between re-integrating with European civilization in a way not possible for 1,500 years (i.e. since the Jewish heresy of Christianity infiltrated the Roman Empire), or siding with the Marxist, Maoist, New Left enemies of European civilization, the ones who brought “Gay Liberation” from Manhattan to London. Instead of taking up our traditional responsibility of defending and glorifying our civilization, as did so many homosexuals in the past like Frederick II and von Humboldt, we supported of those who would destroy that very same civilization.

It is poignantly ironic that gay men were tricked by multiculturalists into allowing successive waves of monotheistic, Abrahamic fundamentalism into Europe, such as African evangelist churches and Islam, just as gays were escaping from under the dead weight of the corpse of Christianity.

Marxist cultural indoctrination (ironically called “consciousness-raising”) ensured homosexuals were given a politically correct version of their history, especially in relation to the significant developments in Nineteenth Century Germany. The Masculinist movement (to which most contemporary homosexuals identified, it seems) has been air-brushed out of gay history, while their main opponent, the Jewish psychiatrist Magnus Hirschfeld with his laughably bizarre explanations for homosexuality (as a “third sex”) is honoured in sombre buildings and worthy institutes.

The slipperiness of the multicultural agenda for homosexuals – to identify ourselves as a minority in order to unite with other minorities against a supposedly hostile dominant culture – stands exposed. We were wafted by the undemanding siren-sounds of the jungle to an exotic paradise of limitless consumption, dreaming of an illusory peace and acceptance bedecked in rainbow flags which sparkle with a tinsel diversity. Beyond Sleeping Beauty’s tower, on the plains of Europe, others are building ugly stunted new towers, spires and minarets, each broadcasting a screech of homophobia that would cause even the jealous Johns, Knox and Calvin, to blanch.

Now “gay” is more a playground insult than a serious description of sexuality and the meaningless rainbow flags have since been appropriated by various anti-war groups, some of whom, if they knew the gay associations with the flag, would trample it in the dirt.

For more information
books
Against Democracy and Equality. Tomislav Sunic (Noontide Press, 2004)
New Culture, New Right. Michael O’Meara (1stBooks, Bloomington 2004)

Service resumes soon...

2006-08-22T10:03:00.000-07:00

The writer of this blog apologizes for the lack of input/ updates since July 3. He was diagnosed with pneumonia during a visit to his Folks in Devon and was admitted to Exeter hospital for key-hole surgery and a subsequent thoracotomy (lung operation) this summer. Normal service will be resumed shortly.

bloodeagle. The carving of the bloodeagle was a particularly cruel kind of killing during which the ribs were separated from the back-bone, folded-out like eagle's wings and the lungs were pulled out, all done whilst the victim was still alive.
This kind of revenge on an enemy is recorded in both skaldic poetry (Sigvat) and in Eddic Lays (Reginsmal 26) as well as in the sagas and could originally come from a human sacrifice, as performed in the Orkneyingasaga 8, where Jarl Einarr had his opponent killed in such a manner and thus “sacrificed him to Odin for the victory”. A similar account can be found in Saxo, Gesta Danorum IX, 315. Other evidence for this kind of killing suggests, however, that it could originally have been a special kind of revenge directed at the killer of one's father.
- DICTIONARY OF NORTHERN MYTHOLOGY. Rudolf Simek (Brewer, Cambridge 1996)

Serena’s Squiffy Suggestion

2006-07-03T10:50:00.000-07:00

So Sir Ian McKellen thinks we should replace the word same-sexer (homosexual in Greek/ Latin, or “Gay” if you prefer, which I don’t) with the noun “gorgeous” to describe ourselves.

Unfortunately I had switched on C4 on Friday too early to catch The Simpsons (there are some interesting observations to be made about Monty Burns’ sidekick Weyland Smithers, homosexuality and Germanic mythology which I won’t go into here) and instead caught Sir Ian making his stupid comment on the Richard and “Flasher” Judy Show, which he repeated the next day at London EuroPride. I’ll have more to say about the major discrepancies in the audience participation figures at the end of this piece, and since I’m still on daytime TV, I hope Paul O’Grady makes a full and lasting recovery as soon as possible.

Here is a dictionary definition of “gorgeous”, which is an Old French word (as is “gorge”): splendid, richly-decorated, magnificent, ornate. All this may be perfect for a diamond-and-pearl encrusted La Patsy Bouffant and her fabulous pussies, or even yourself, but it doesn’t describe me in my white T-shirt and jeans, and neither I suspect does it describe the vast majority of readers of these boards (the Gods help us if I’m wrong!).

Not only is the word “gorgeous” bad enough (an inaccurate joke) but it shares associations with even more unsavoury characters. And I mean ideas far worse than George Galloway in a Lycra cat-suit.

1. From the Old French “gorge” meaning throat, it has gone into the language as the act of gorging, excessive consuming; gluttony. Much as a leech is engorged with blood from some poor sod who falls into the Limpopo, or a boa-constrictor is engorged after swallowing whole a baby sloth. It emphasises the worst aspects of gay consumerism.
2. From it’s meaning of “narrow passage” it brings up a bundle of obvious sexual metaphors, from sodomy (which most same-sexers never indulge in) to cock-sucking. “Engorged” is a favourite word of pornographers…we all know why.
3. Gore: Dried, dirty blood. Gouge (very nasty).

Wearily pursuing these unpleasant associations even further, I looked in
Roget’s Thesaurus, and found this:

361 (colourful).19: gorgeous, gay (well, you got that right, Sir Ian), florid, gay coloured, gaudy
902 (ostentation).20 gaudy, tawdry, gorgeous, garish, loud, blatant, glaring, flaring, screaming, obtrusive, vulgar, crude, meretricious (from Latin meaning befitting a harlot).

Well, how would you like to be associated with all that in the general public’s mind? I know it would make me very angry. Sir Ian McKellen had the luxury of waiting until his privileged middle ages before coming out, and as a Shakespearean actor you’d think he’d be a bit more sensitive to words and their associations. I think he should be forced to gorge himself on an English dictionary.

As for the Europride figures, they seemed tiny even compared with London Prides in the 80s-90s, and much smaller than the previous continental versions. Police estimated 40,000, and why would Sir Ian Blair lie? It’s not as if we’re all Islamic Jihadists whose apparent support the police would naturally want to suppress. We’re on the other side.

According to the Europride organisers’ site, 750,000 showed up on the streets. That’s almost 19 people for every one counted by the cops. Where did the rest go? Was it the Dr. Who Scribble Monster? If they’d covered the 1934 Nuremberg rally, they’d have asserted that precisely seven Nazis turned up. And two chimps in Hitler Youth uniforms, one of whome doubled up as Minister for Propaganda Goebbels!

Alisdair
Delenda est Carthago!

Running the Clock Back

2006-06-24T06:20:00.000-07:00

The reasons are obvious for wanting to reverse the direction we are heading towards. Climate change, industrial pollution and the violent Balkanization of our cities throughout the West,

United Nations

Earlier this month, the UN put forward the argument for accelerating modernism. Kofe Annan gleefully announced that mass migration had increased by one quarter in the 1.5 decades since 1990. He complacently and arrogantly declared that it was “something we can’t stop”, and that it was a “normal part of development”. Yes, in the same way that the Fall of the Roman Empire was also a “normal part of development”.

Rear Admiral Chris Parry of British Intelligence also understood this valid comparison with the Fall of Rome when earlier this month he predicted the immanent collapse through external mass immigration of our own European culture and civilization between the years 2012-2018.

Development Receivers

Meanwhile, the UN joyfully spouts its relentless mantra on the “positive” benefits of migration – how remittances from First to Third World “development receivers” have benefited such countries as Korea, the Philippines, Somalia and Sri Lanka (oh, and sorry about those First World wages being sent home and used to buy guns for your bloody civil wars, guys).

The UN makes a completely erroneous comparison with an earlier period when southern Europe, Italy and Ireland benefited from apparently similar remittances at the beginning of the last century. The difference of course is that when Irish and Italian Americans sent wages back to their homelands, they were simply transferring cash from one part of Western Civilization to another, of the same race and culture; a sort of levelling-out from a resource-rich North America to a more populous, impoverished and exploited Old World, from which North American civilization originated and without which it could never have existed.

The difference today is that those wages/ remittances are being drained from our own European homelands directly into the hands of the enemies of Europe; the Muslim Crescent from the Morocco to Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia, with the Middle East at its heart, south American drug-smugglers and bandits and the black sub-Saharan non-civilizations where crime, disease, rape, torture and murder rule. According to Hannes Jocknick of the United Nations, this withering of economic wealth is of benefit even to the developed industrial nations. Try getting your head around that assertion.

In addition, mass migration means more airline flights, more stratospheric pollution as immigrants regularly visit family members, and pick up spouses, in far-flung corners of the globe.

Ethnic Nationalism

The alternative to this UN cosmopolitan nightmare is the recognition of racial, and hence cultural differences, which deserve to be maintained. This is the way we must turn the clock back, away from global Armageddon and climate catastrophe. But this reversal needn’t involve an abandonment of science and technology in the West; quite the opposite. It involves rational state planning, automation, space travel, but all with a healthy respect for environmentalism and Mother Earth. A few decades ago, at the height of the Cold War, the two Superpowers had a concept of a countdown to nuclear annihilation, sometimes standing at hours but on a few occasions (such as during the Yom Kippur War), ticking away at four minutes or less. The Henry Fonda movie FAIL SAFE best illustrated this point, culminating in the voluntary destruction by the Americans of New York City. We need to get this idea of a lethal countdown back into our heads, but instead of the final seconds leading to global nuclear holocaust, we must imagine it as the spiritual, artistic, political, social and economic snuffing out of Europe.

We need to recognize that racial differences are significant, more than “skin deep”, and that each race developed its own unique culture in its own original homeland. A return to these original homelands would guarantee human global diversity forever. Just like the biological environmental bio-diversity and synergies that we are, perhaps too late, at last beginning to celebrate and attempting to preserve.

Appropriate Ideas

What may be good for a time for one particular race and culture, e.g the development of capitalism in north-western Europe, we should accept as being highly destructive to other races, e..g. Australian Aborigines. Or the Jewish development of banking interest rates, which may be fine for the Jews, but which had done so much harm to the rest of the planet and its inhabitants.

Civil Conflict and the Resolution of the Olympiad

Above all each folk must be taught thoroughly the founding mythology, history and values of its own original culture, to encourage a sense of national folk collectivism, so that each individual sees himself as a part of a whole, an extended family. In this way internal economic class divisions can be eliminated, and the nation identified with folk collectivism. Of course, as in any family, differences will occur, and in the national context these will become manifest as civil wars. But without outside interference, and with an underlying comradeship, these civil wars will burn themselves out quickly, as happened amongst the City States of Ancient Greece.

Thunderbirds

If a nation threatens its neighbours, whether through direct territorial invasion, or (more likely and indirectly) by, say, building dirty coal-fired power stations threatening widespread global environmental pollution, a “League of Nations” should be allowed to issue a threat, and if necessary execute a policy of aerial bombardment, without subsequent invasion by land-forces. A sort of 21st Century Thunderbirds.

High Flyers

National collective autarky will still offer meaningful contributions for the ambitious and the dedicated, but instead of working for global corporations that demand international flights, the high-flyers will be encouraged to work directly for corporations within their own country or culture. To take an example from the recent past, for an English computer executive from 1950s Europe, his duty and means of support would be from ICL and not IBM, hence saving stratospheric pollution caused by racking up thousands of miles of useless aircraft travel.

Protein Factories

In this ideal world of races returning to their original homelands, problems may arise through a lack of natural resources on their own lands. As a very short-term solution, strictly-limited international trade would provide a stop-gap (using sailing ships, rather than industrial cargo container tankers). Ultimately, in the medium term, these resource problems would be solved by self-limiting populations, with the numbers of people dependent on how much their own land and sea, and industrial food manufacture (protein and plankton factories etc.) can sustain them.

As examples, “white” Americans could be welcomed back to find homelands in Europe and Siberia (and not just the United Kingdom, as the United Kingdom itself is but a small part of the true Aryan homeland stretching across the whole northern Eurasian continent). 9 million Jews could build new homes within the limits of the pre-1967 Israeli borders. If greater metropolises such as London, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Mexico City can exist on even less land, then this should prove no problem. (See the discussion of environmentally sealed Arcologies in my Aryan Futurism article, below).

The watch-words for the future are that global consumer capitalism is destroying our planet, and above all migration is a polite word for the ugly notion of invasion. By reversing both these fatal trends, in the teeth of the United Nations, Atlanticists, international corporate capitalists and New World Order Zionists, we are at last handing over a meaningful future to our children.

Moscow Declaration/ Pavel Tulaev speech

2006-06-21T13:29:00.000-07:00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE DECLARATION
of the representatives of European nations and countries -
the participants of the international conference
"THE WHITE WORLD'S FUTURE", held in Moscow, June 8-10, 2006. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reasoning from the fact that our nations have a common origin, common roots of languages and cultures, as well as a common will to preserve their identitites;

taking into consideration that all of our nations face a mortal danger today; taking into consideration that they risk not only to lose their identities, but also to vanish from the face of the earth;

establishing the fact that the governments of our countries and existing international organizations, NATO included, do not assure the existence of European nations, intensify the danger and do not to make efforts to bring together Russia and the European Union (which is, to our mind, of vital importance today),

we, the participants of the above-named conference, have taken the decisions:

1. to create an alternative international council aimed at fighting for the survival of the White nations and preserving their identities. We do mean a council, not a board of directors of any kind that issues orders and commands;

2. to establish constant and continuous interchange of information;

3. to publish regular declarations on the most important issues and to take measures for protecting the rights of fighters for the life and identity of their nations, who have become or will become victims of repressions;

4. to form a council of all Indo-European nations that have their own states as well as of the nations or peoples that do not have their own states (Bretons, Flemings, Basques, etc.) with equal participation;

5. to elect a committee of representatives aimed at working out corresponding and coordinated documents. The council will have a network structure without a constant centre. Provisions for the replacement of a member of the committee of representatives with a substitute are also to be made.

6. To choose the Internet as the basic vehicle of communication. Provisions for changing e-mail addresses opportunely are to be made.

We call upon all representatives of countries and nations that did not take part in our conference to join our organization on the same terms and conditions.

We see future prospects for expanding our organizations on all the continents inhabited by white people and creating the Indo-European Nations (IEN) organization on par with the United Nations (UN).

The Declaration has been signed by:

Anatoly Ivanov (Russia)
Vladimir Avdeyev (Russia)
Pavel Tulaev (Russia), "Athenaeum"
Galyna Lozko (Ukraine), "Svarog"
Pierre Vial (France), "Terre et Peuple"
Guillaume Faye (France)
Jan-Ber Tillenon (Breizh)
Pierre Krebs (Germany), "Thule-Seminar"
Constantin von Hoffmeister (Germany)
Enrique Ravello (Spain), "Tierra y Pueblo"
Eleftherios Ballas (Greece), "ARMA"

The Text was prepared and discussed by the Organizing Committee in Moscow, 2006 ©
Translated by Max Kalt, 2006 ©

Pavel Tulaev
EURO-RUSSIA IN THE CONTEXT OF WORLD WAR IV
Dear comrades and friends! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please accept my hearty thanks for your participation in the conference THE WHITE WORLD'S FUTURE, for your excellent and strong reports. And please accept my congratulations concerning our common success today. Owing to you - the heroes of the present - we have one more victory in our long, dramatic struggle for truth, faith, justice, race and a better future.

Our conference today is an obvious demonstration of a new great return to sacred roots and real fundamental values. Together, we confirm the rebirth of the profoundly European and holy Russian spirit.

We do not intent just to go back to old times for a formal reconstruction of a glorious past. We are conscious that a simple return to old traditions and myths in their archaic forms is impossible in our age. We will never have another Hellas, a third Roman Empire, a Fourth Reich or another USSR.

New Epoch

We have entered into an absolutely new epoch, a new time and spaces. Some thinkers call it the Krita Yuga, post-Christian era, New Age or New Renaissance. We live in a wondering new world with new laws, lies and ideas. Every day, we are facing the challenges of the 21st century. We have to resolve problems of progressive science and technology, contemporary economics and politics, new religions and modern aesthetics.

Good old rules from Christian and Communist times do not work. Sweet Jesus doesn't save. Communism is once again in the past. Fascism has become old-fashioned.

Nordic Germany is being populated by Turks. Belle France looks like Africa. Mongoloid Japan is called the West. And our Nordic Belarus is attacked by the so-called North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Beautiful America - the dream of millions of European refugees and immigrants - that used to be free, proud and White, has transformed into an aggressive terrorist state, the corrupt policeman #1, protecting Masonic power, human degeneration, race-mixing and global Zionism.

Instead of the red Soviet Union with its GULAG we have a New White Russia, the hope of the heroes fighting for our race and freedom all over the world. Why is it so? How can we explain these paradoxes?

Russia is much more than a country

Russia is much more than a country. It was called Holy Russia, Moscow Kingdom, Russian Empire, Soviet Union, and in spite of all the changes, it still possesses some special essence. Her White body is living in the heavens, guarding the memory and the spirit of our race.

Located in the center of the Eurasian continent, Russia was, is and always will be the biggest European country, protecting the West from Mongol-Tatars and Turkish nomads. Formally you may call it post-European, like the USA, because we are the legatees of white colonizers and culture-bearers. But through our race, language, roots and civilization, we are Europeans in spite of all the dramas of the 20th century.

Native Russians make up the main body of our big nation, the nucleus and the spine of our state. If not for the Russians, the whole of Eurasia and Siberia would had been conquered by Chinese or Muslim tribes. Russia is still the center of White resistance in the Caucasus and the Far East.

That's why I propose to rename Guillaume Faye's project of "Eurosiberia" into "Euro-Russia". In this way, the real historical and juridical subject (Russia) is not substituted by the geographic space called "Siberia". From a geopolitical point of view, we come to the ethno-political one.

Unfortunately, the Russian people have become a divided nation today, like Germany's after World War II. The very heart of our Old Russia has broken into three big pieces: Great Russia, White Russia (Belarus), and the Ukraine (its historical name was Rus or Little Russia). The project of Euro-Russia will help to unite the three Russias in a new way and on a new level.

Russia must be a strong national state inside the frontiers of the Slavic part of the former empire. Russians compose more than 80% of the whole population of our state now, so we do not need any multicultural version for our homogeneous nation. Other European, Aryan and White people can be our allies in the world struggle against human degradation.

That's why we support our friends' efforts to build the new continental axis "Paris-Berlin-Moscow " or a pan-Aryan bloc from Spain to India. We obviously need a post-NATO alternative - a new military and political block.

After the victory in 1945 and a long period of Soviet occupation in the GDR (old Slavic lands), our government let Germany be reunited. It was a good gesture, a big gift and a political compromise. In the same manner, Europeans should understand our modern problems.

World War IV

This alternative is developing in the context of World War IV.

The Second World War between the Third Reich and the Soviet Union was in fact a realization of Churchill's and Roosevelt's conspiracy. After having studied Anthony Sutton's works, we can add that these were the plans of the "Skull and Bones" secret order whose dirty tentacles permeated Europe during the First World War. In honor of the heroes who fell in fratricidal battles, we must learn this lesson of history.

The so called "Cold War" is also finished because the USSR has crashed. It does not exist anymore. And Communism as an international movement belongs to the past. Modern Russia is far from being a socialist society because the state is controlled by a capitalist oligarchy.

After the NATO bombings of Belgrade in 1999 and the terrorist diversion of September 11 in New York City, we live in another epoch. You may call it World War IV or just the New World War.

It is very important to realize that this is a war of a modern generation and not only by numbers. The factions are not states or nations anymore but transnational structures, like bankers, Microsoft or the porn business. This war is waged by qualitatively new weapons: brainpower, high technologies, biopolitics, mass media and drugs and programmers. I call it "sweet war" or "honey hell".

Islamic terrorism is only one conflict in a bigger scenario that unites us nowadays. Islamic expansion has always been dangerous not only to Russia, but to the whole of Europe. In the Middle Ages, the Muslim world surrounded White nations. The specific point of today's situation is that NATO and other globalists provoke Islamic attacks in order to destabilize the European way of life. I am sure that the war in Chechnya and the new Afghanistan crisis were planned and calculated with the help of strategists from overseas.

American activity in Central Asia can provoke a big war in the heart of Eurasia. It is very dangerous. In this situation, the role of the Russian army is becoming especially important. Nowadays, European security depends on our warriors as it has in the period of the anti-Turkish alliance.

This war against Islam will last a long time. It is not easy to convert Muslims into Christians and to make Europeans out of Asians. That is why we raise our Aryan heritage. It should help us to oppose the Islamic invasion in the South-East.

Synergies

Shall we live isolated and go away to the mountains or should we build a new society and state? Can we dream about a new empire - a synthesis of the Third Rome, the Third Reich and the USSR - or just construct our Web-sites and exchange information from various countries?

We must work and fight together for a Traditionalist and New Right alternative to the modern degeneration. We should carefully study the ancient and Christian world, make traditional reconstructions and organize festivals, publish books, magazines and newspapers. We should continue uniting our Internet resources as we have started at the web-portal www.ateney.ru.

You may call it Aryan or White Revolution, but please always stress the positive aspects of our movement. We don't want to repeat mistakes of the 20th century. And let us start with ourselves. Let us be wise, educated and strong. Leave the ignorance to the fools. Let us be responsible for our nations, our race, and common heritage.

In any case, we should not work for any sort of "imperialisms." Instead, we need a dynamic synergie or synarchy (leaderless resistance) that can become a living alternative to the pro-NATO European Union.

The center of the world is shifting towards the East. Let it not be Central Asia or China. Who will lead the gigantic Eurasian empire if the percentage of White blood is being reduced as we reach the Pacific Ocean? Who will colonize the enormous areas of Siberia, Asia and the Far East? If we follow the Eurasian principle, "soil before blood," we can already admit our defeat to the Asians, the Chinese and the Muslims of the Caucasus whose ethnical expansion is a menace to our future.

So we do not want Eurasia (a mixture of Asia and Europe) instead of our holy Russia. And we proclaim the fundamental principle: "Blood before Soil!" Biopolitics vs. Geopolitics!

The White World's Future

The modern world, in spite of its technological achievements, is going to hell. Our divine White race is infected by liberal ideals and capitalist standards. It is degenerating and degrading. Switch on the TV, look around the Internet, listen to pop music. What do you see? Stupid shows and non-stop advertising for millions of passive spectators. Transnational business needs you only as a consumer. You must pay, buy and cry with happiness! You are in a golden cell (a new kind of prison) and under sweet occupation.

Asia, Africa and Latin America are following their religious traditions and are growing in population. The White world is making money and having fun. And it is dying.

State-provoked terrorism will not resolve these problems. We need another solution. We want a revolution among Whites. An absolutely new alternative to this vampirism. We want genetic improvement, cultural renaissance and political organization. Our dream is an alliance of White nations, a new military bloc, a new international pact or even a confederation. Not at once, not in one day, but in a real and pragmatic way.

We know that there exists a strong global opposition to this "honey hell." There are different forms of organized and leaderless resistance. We are a proper part of this world "reconquista". Our fight is our way of life, our way to be free, honest and proud.

Though it is not enough nowadays for the victory. Besides the resistance and strong opposition the to the degradation of the White world, we need a constructive alternative. That's why we are here. Our conference today, THE WHITE WORLD'S FUTURE, should be one more step in the building of our new home. Our sacred Fatherland.

This will be an honorable gift to our Beloved Gods and Ancestors. It will be our own Victory in the modern War.

Proud Slavs or New World Order Slaves: Update

2006-06-21T10:41:00.000-07:00

On June 5 2006 Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner Thomas Hammarberg said the Moscow authorities were right to break up the Moscow Gay Parade. In this he is supported by Moscow gay activist Ed Mishin.

PRESS RELEASE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE "THE WHITE WORLD'S

2006-06-19T11:40:00.000-07:00

Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:21 am (PST)

Moscow, June 8-10, 2006

Based on the initiative of the Russian international magazine
ATHENAEUM and the Russian EUROPEAN SYNERGY Centre, an international
conference, "THE WHITE WORLD'S FUTURE", was held in Moscow, June 8 –
10, 2006. The conference had both scientific and practical natures
and was dedicated to the common roots, traditions and contemporary
problems faced by the White world, and their possible solutions.

The conference was held at the assembly hall of the International
Fund for Slavic Literature and Culture (Chernigovsky Pereulok, 9/13),
according to the rules of accreditation declared in advance. The
conference was coordinated and hosted by Pavel Tulaev. In two days,
the following reports were delivered:

June 8, 2006

1. "Requiem or Reconquista?" by Anatoly Ivanov (Russia).
2. "From Geopolitics to Ethnopolitics. New Notion of
Eurosiberia: The Main Historical Role of Russia" by Guillaume Faye
(France).
3. "Strategy for the New Culture" by Pierre Krebs (Germany).
4. "North-South Struggle: The Clash of Civilizations" by Pierre
Vial (France).
5. "Hygiene of the European Thought" by Vladimir Avdeyev
(Russia).
6. "The White World and Mondialization" by Jose Maria Alvarez
(Spain).
7. "Our Fight for Our Race and Our Future" by David Duke (USA).

June 9, 2006

1. "Our Future State according to the Indo-European Traditions"
by Jan-Ber Tillenon (Bretagne).
2. "Native Faith in the New Renaissance: Its Place and Role" by
Galyna Lozko (Ukraine).
3. "ARMA – for Aryan Identity and Racial Spirit" by Eleftherios
Ballas (Greece).
4. "European Heritage and Uncertain Future" by Enrique Ravello
(Spain).
5. "The Danger of Turkish Mass Immigration and Turkey's
Membership in the EU" by Gerhoch Reisegger (Austria).
6. "White Eurasia: Biopolitics versus Geopolitics" by Constantin
von Hoffmeister (Germany).
7. "Europe and Russia in the Context of World War IV" by Pavel
Tulaev (Russia).
The delegates who were to be present but could not attend for various
reasons had authorized their representatives to deliver their
reports:
1. "Towards a New Renaissance: Humanism, Spirituality and the
Future" by Barbara Krieger (Poland)
2. "New Paleolith as a Future for Europe" by Silvano Lorenzoni
(Italy).
3. "Why do We oppose NATO?" by Robert Steuckers (Belgium).
4. "Metapolitical Front of the White Movement" by Anton Rachev
(Bulgaria).

Friendly greetings of the following prominent and respective people
have been heard: salutary speech of Alexander Sevastianov, the leader
of NDPR; salutary speech of Alexander Ivanov, the leader of NNP
(delivered by Alexey Shiropayev); salutary speeches by Vladimir
Ivanov, Alexander Rudakov, Yury Ivanov, Valery Milovanov and others.
The host has also familiarized the audience with salutations from
different countries.

Alongside speeches, new publications by the delegates have been
introduced, as well as new editions of the "Athenaeum" and "SLAVA"
publishing house.

On June 9, at the House of Slavic Music (Taganskaya, 40), a
ceremonial evening party took place in which the delegates, alongside
our friends and numerous guests, took part. It opened with a concert
of classical and modern music performed by the Russian National
Academic Orchestra "Boyan", directed by the national artist of Russia
and the USSR, Professor Anatoly Poletayev. The vocal turns were
performed by the soloists Kuliushkina, Krylov and Ermakova. Great
musical compositions of European classical composers, such as Glinka,
Grieg, Strauss, Chaikovsky and Rachmaninov, as well as patriotic
anthems by Anatoly Poletayev, were welcomed with cheers.

Right after the concert, the delegates were invited onto the stage
and had a chance to address the audience with brief salutary
speeches. The delegates spoke about the importance of White unity in
the modern world. After the salutary speeches, a dinner party took
place.

An excursion to the Tretyakov Gallery was organized for the delegates
on June 10, 2006 to acquaint the guests with masterpieces of Russian
art. As a conclusion, the delegates visited the museum of Konstantin
Vasiliev, where they were welcomed by Anatoly Doronin.

The same night at the museum, the final meeting of twelve of the
delegates took place, during which the achievements of the conference
were summed up. Each of the delegates had a chance to speak in a
circle, to give one's view on ideological and practical points, to
subject some of the points to criticism or to offer assistance. As a
conclusion of this discussion (led by Pavel Tulaev), it has been
decided:

 to consider the WWF Conference, that has become an historical
event, to be accomplished successfully.
 to publish the reports of the delegates and other relevant
information, both in the source languages and translated into
Russian.
 to hold the White Forum annually and to organize the next
conference in one of the Slavic countries.
 to invite the delegates, that could not come to Moscow in
June 2006, to a seminar of Athenaeum in the Crimea (September 2006).
 to study possible options of opening an international school
for young people.
 to establish contacts and interchange of information via the
Internet and to create a system of Web sites.

A discussion of the final declaration of the conference, prepared by
Anatoly Ivanov in Russian and French, also took place. After the
discussion, the final declaration, in which the necessity of
collaboration and creating a new international union is proclaimed,
was signed by: Anatoly Ivanov (Russia), Vladimir Avdeyev (Russia),
Pavel Tulaev (Russia), Galyna Lozko (Ukraine), Pierre Vial (France),
Guillaume Faye (France), Jan-Ber Tillenon (Bretagne), Pierre Krebs
(Germany), Constantin von Hoffmeister (Germany), Enrique Ravello
(Spain), Eleftherios Ballas (Greece).

The declaration will be published in the press, as well as on the Web
site of Athenaeum, right after its translation into the primary
European languages.

The face of Athena, the common European goddess of wisdom and just
war, has been selected as a symbol of our union. A slogan, "WHITES OF
THE WORLD – UNITE!", has been selected as a motto.

The organizers want to thank all the participants of the conference,
as well as those who rendered assistance.

Press Release prepared by the Organizing Committee in Moscow, June
2006
Translated by Maxim Kalt, June 15, 2006 ©

666 Sucking on Satan’s Teat

2006-06-19T11:22:00.000-07:00

(with apologies to Harlan Ellison)

June 6 2006 (06.06.06.) marked the end of the morbid Judeo-Christian desire to bring on the end of the world (ver-old – the age of man – in this context Nordic/ Aryan man).

This cursed number from the garbage-strewn Revelation of St. John has long fascinated adherents of the death-cults of the Middle East, but we inhabitants of Middle Earth (Midgard) have good reason to rejoice at messages and events that transpired on that date.

On the evening of Tuesday June 6 Newsnight (22:30, BBC2) reported two significant “turning points” for the attempted Bush/ Blair New World Order take-over. The first was the final, devastating exposure of the American policy of “Rendition”; that spider’s web of democratically-inspired torture stretching from the American homeland to western and eastern Europe to Iraq, Afghanistan and all points south-east – the direction of Ironwood and the land of the ogres.

The second about-turn involved Tony Blair’s final loss of credibility amongst his own die-hard NuLab supporters, long after the British public as a whole had woken up to the reality of the notorious “satanic eyes” Tory election poster of Blair during the 1997 plebiscite. Blair has been left isolated and exposed on his own island of despondency, LOST to deal with the invisible monsters about to club him over his head and drag him away.

Nothing in history comes to an end abruptly, in the blink of an eye, so the Atlanticist Capitalists struggled on that same evening with a grim documentary (21:00, BBC2) about global warming and climate catastrophe, idly assuming that Big Business will carry on as usual: typhoons blasting Shanghai, hurricanes in the Caribbean, deadly heat-waves in Paris, submerged idyllic South Seas atolls and a future London inundated within a decade via the triple-threat of rising sea-levels, tidal surges and increased rainfall carried southward from the source of Old Father Thames. Just as J.G. Ballard predicted in his brilliant and prescient DROWNED WORLD (1961). Immediately afterward (22:00) Channel 4 served up the latest episode of meaningless, brutal violence appropriately called LOST, all the time interspersed with adverts for the latest cars, exotic holidays and all the other latest consumerist capitalist trinkets and baubles. BBC2 continued the gloomy theme of the evening (23:20) with a snobbish documentary about English soccer hooligans (which up until the time of writing this we have been excused from the current World Cup in Germany – in fact quite the opposite. English supporters have been praised by the German authorities as amongst the best in the World Cup).

Finally, at the 25-minute count-down to the end of this supposedly ominous day, Channel 4 transmitted a flashy, incoherent documentary about the gruesome fates that befell the cast and crew and others involved in the first production of THE OMEN (1976): a double lightning-strike on planes initially carrying producers of the movie from Los Angeles to London and co-incidental plane crashes, Lee Remick’s near-fatal accident falling off a balcony, a similar fate suffered by one of the stuntmen a year later, mad rottweillers and baboons, an IRA bomb at the hotel of the production staff, and most horrifically of all the decapitation of one of the extras by a tiger.

All these bizarre if directly unconnected events were ascribed to being the work of the Xian Devil – but the logic hardly stands up. Why would the Prince of Darkness do his best to thwart the production of a tacky, vacuous Hollywood movie celebrating his power, glory and immanent return?

Far more likely, if indeed supernatural intervention was undermining the production of THE OMEN, is supernatural intervention from the Old Gods, the Aryan Pantheon having a bit of fun with those promoting the insulting Middle Eastern death-cults. Many of the unnatural events bear the stamp of Loki the Trickster God, having a laugh at the expense of Judeo-Christian dupes.

And here lies the true significance of June 6 2006; that it had no significance. No re-apperance from Satan, or indeed his opposite. No apocalyptic scenario.

The only news, as reported on Newsnight, was good news. Another two nails in the coffin for the dying Bush/ Blair fundamentalist Xian agenda.

With their delusional fantasies blown away, the true vision for the way forward is increasingly clear: the hope and glory offered by the European New Right and Aryan Futurism.

Proud Slavs or New World Order Slaves?

2006-05-20T11:47:00.000-07:00

“Homophobia” in eastern Europe

Much has been written recently about attacks by east European nationalists on “gays” and other minorities, exemplified by the fierce war of words over the Moscow “Gay Pride” Parade at the end of this month. As of writing, the ban decreed by Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov on May 18 remains in force.

It's worth examining the issues underlying these attacks and avoid coming to the sort of glib conclusions reached by well-heeled, self-serving human rights lawyers and pompous journalists from their plush offices in London, Geneva, Vienna, Stockholm or New York.

Western plutocratic subversion

Russia has a history of being viciously targeted by the West's plutocratic elite since before the (non-Russian) Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. Winston Churchill resolved to spread the chaos by sending British troops to Russia in 1918; more recently behind-the-scenes string-pullers such as billionaire George Soros have been instrumental in the “color revolutions” of the former Soviet Republics of Georgia and Ukraine. The staged, pro-Western rainbow revolutions of these capitalist agitators hit the buffers after attempting to dislodge the popular government of Alexander Lukashenko in Belarus. The manipulators in the West know their time is running short. Theirs is the frantic writhing around of a slug in a Cellini salt cellar.

Once again the snivelling worms of the New World Order are injecting their poison into the heart of Mother Russia, only this time the pretext is “human rights” - specifically Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transsexual rights. The constant hectoring from smug, grand-standing liberals in the West may well over time make the lives of ordinary homosexuals in eastern Europe worse, not better. Homosexuals are in danger of becoming wrongly perceived as a fifth column, undermining the integrity of nation and culture, when in fact and throughout history the very opposite is true.

Demographics in decline

The hypocritical promoters of human rights know that Russia and other eastern European nations are experiencing an unprecedented demographic crisis. Data from Rosstat, the state statistics service, reveals that the population of the Russian Federation has decreased by 5 million in the last ten years, and the mortality rate exceeds the birthrate by more than 50 percent. As a result, some are predicting that the population of Russia may shrink to half of what it is now by the middle of the century. More modestly, the United Nations has the population decreasing by a third by 2050.

During his important, hour-long, seventh annual state-of-the-nation address delivered a week ago (May 10 2006) in the Kremlin's Marble Hall, President Vladimir Putin stressed the importance of increasing Russia's birth-rate. In an interview published in Moscow News two days later, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said, “'Saving the nation' - numerically, physically, and morally - is the utmost task for the state. All measures to raise living standards - housing, diet, healthcare, education, morality, etc. - are in effect designed to save the nation. This is an overriding priority”.

In this concern for the very survival of Russia, Putin and Solzhenitsyn are merely reflecting the overwhelming concerns of ordinary Russians. “Demographics is an acute problem in Russia, and it's discussed by everybody” says a young Siberian professional interviewed by Graeme Smith for Canada's Globe and Mail (21.04.06).

Neither President Putin nor Solzhenitsyn blamed homosexuality for this catastrophic decline, but others have, including Serafim Melentyev, head of the World Development Institute, who has backed the position of the Russian Orthodox Church. "Advertising homosexuality taking into consideration the disastrous demographic situation in the country is equal to suicide, as the Patriarch said. In my opinion, this is the best wording...Today Russians are dying. And it is evident that homosexual families cannot have children." Melentyev said at a recent press conference in Moscow.

This position is echoed by Maxim Obukhov, head of the Orthodox Zhizn (Life) medical and enlightenment center, who said at the same press conference, "That is why it is unacceptable to advertise homosexuality anywhere. Because the number of people born homosexuals is quite low. A lot of people become involved through the mass media and various public organizations."

Muddled Thinking

It is this muddled thinking which needs to be challenged. Sadly, homosexual activists and their Western backers are ignoring this issue which is of such vital importance to the Russian people, and are instead concentrating on their trivial, childish demands to parade through the streets of Moscow to the beat of second-rate Pet Shop Boys-style French warbler Desireless.

Homosexuality and birth-rates

To me the notion that male homosexuality is detrimental to a nation's reproduction has always been unconvincing. A fertile woman produces one egg once a month, whereas men produce millions of sperm daily. Population is dependent on the number of fertile women who have the opportunity to conceive, not on what may or may not happen to men's excess sperm. By far the most important factor for reproduction rates is economics; whether a woman has adequate financial support during pregnancy and after. Rich industrialized countries such as Germany, France, Italy and Japan are beginning to understand this basic fact once again by increasing financial and other benefits for young mothers. The surest way to decrease population is by forcing unwilling women into the workplace just in order to survive, as happens in Britain. This is deliberate NuLab policy, and their destructive, genocidal policy needs to be exposed and reversed.

Abortion rates would drop if single mothers were guaranteed respect and a reasonably comfortable life by society. They should also have the option of handing over their new-born to be brought up with care and dignity by the state.

In contrast, the number of homosexual men in society has always been a small percentage, irrelevant to overall birth-rates. Homosexuality is not learned behaviour; like heterosexuality it is innate. How homosexuals are treated by fellow citizens is totally irrelevant to population growth or decline. But it is relevant to how far that culture may progress on a technological, political and artistic level, and how successful society is at defending itself.

Despite the arguments above, nothing is more important than the re-generation of the race, least of all homosexual self-gratification. So in the unlikely last resort that European homosexuals are called upon to “do their duty” - they must comply for their own sakes and for the sake of future generations.

Given the legitimate concerns of the Russian people, the Western emphasis on “gay rights” appears perverse and almost deliberately designed to antagonize. Russian homosexuals themselves, perhaps the majority, question the wisdom of such a parade. Activist Alexei Khordorkovsky is quoted in the liberal Moscow Times (19.05.06) as saying, “We don't have gay society in this country. It's not good timing...This will only consolidate forces against us”. What good is a bunch of self-indulgent exhibitionists flouncing through the streets of Moscow in their shocking pink feather boas and lime-green Lycra shorts – how is this meant to win over the general Russian population?

Is it any wonder that eastern European nationalists are beginning to perceive homosexuals, rightly or wrongly, as part of an “Alien Supremacist” agenda, determined to destroy their nation and culture? It is to this same alien agenda that millions of Russians and other Europeans have been forced to pay with their lives during the last century. Behind the apparently noble facade of liberal-individualist concern for humanity they see lurking the monstrous, Lovecraftian shapes of the usual suspects. Prominent amongst the inciters of gay exhibitionism are former French Culture Minister and socialist Jack Lang and Terry Davis from the pain-in-the-arse Council of Europe, whose commitment to true eastern European self-determination (or indeed true homosexual self-determination) is open to question. Russian nationalists on the other hand have no wish to see their cities mimicking the crime-ridden, riot-torn multicultural maelstroms of western Europe and north America such as London, Paris, New York or Los Angeles, with their festering pockets of impoverishment. They don't need lectures from notorious apologists for Muslim queer-bashers like the New York-based Human Rights Watch.

A Way Forward

Famous Russian homosexuals fall into the usual pattern, repeated across Europe, of excelling in the fields of either high culture (Tchaikovsky, Diaghilev, Nijinsky) or the military (Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich). As an explorer of Mongolia, Nikolai Przhevalsky, like Alexander von Humboldt before him, can be imagined as combining and synthesizing the best of both worlds.

Russian homosexuals must stand four-square behind Putin and others' laudable efforts to increase Russia's birth-rate, and reject pressure from pompous spokesmen in the West to conform to bankrupt liberalism, capitalism and excess individualism. Eastern European homosexuals need to forge new alliances with non-Christian, pagan nationalists and European Identitarians. If no local non-Christian nationalist, pagan or European Identitarian group exists, then it's up to homosexuals to create one. It is, after all, one of the things we're meant to be good at. We need to re-assert our true identity as defenders of and contributors to Aryan culture.

Russia – Europe's Motherland

More generally, western Europe needs to look afresh at its fraught relationship with the east. All (indigenous) Europeans are in a profound sense Russians. Southern Russia was the location of the revolution in European thought which later came to be identified with Bronze Age Aryan culture. It is where Europeans first encountered and domesticated the horse, which was to play a major role in Aryan myth, legend and culture. It is where something as basic as the wheel and wheeled transportation was invented, and modern European culture is inconceivable without Russia. Theirs is a magnificent civilization that pre-dates by centuries Christian interference. For more, see my ARYAN ORIGINS essay.

The steppes of southern Russia are the most likely location for the dawning realization of the unique Faustian spirit of European Man. It was here, after traversing the continent from the Atlantic coast at the end of the last Ice Age, where he first beheld the vista of endless steppes, endless land, stretching forth before him. The contrast between that and his previous environment of dense, dark, impenetrable (at least to stone-age axes) forests of central Europe could not have been greater. Here, in present-day Russia, a sense of limitlessness, of infinity, was actualized in the European psyche. In nobler times this consciousness of infinity was primarily a spiritual awareness, as evident in Aryan mythology. In our own age, the rusting Iron Age, this splendid vision has been corrupted into a sense of purely material limitlessness; an erroneous desire to amass as much money and as many material goods as possible, to the obvious detriment of our culture, home continent and planet.

Today, a powerful synergy exists between eastern and western Europe, with Russia providing skills and energy (Gazprom etc.) and western Europe providing wealth, technology and manpower; the fruits of centuries of living in close proximity in city and nation states. Ironically, migration within Europe today is from east to west. In time this will change. The greatest opportunities for development of raw materials, land and ultimately hope lie to the east.

Russia is a European nation. It is the only major European nation outside the European Union. This is intolerable, for cultural, geo-political and economic reasons, and Russia should be invited immediately to join and take a leading role in the European Union (and its successors). With the resurgence of Aryan spirituality across our continent, Russia will once again be at the vanguard of our European family of nations.

Chris Smith – Failure of the Test

2006-05-18T05:27:00.000-07:00

The Rt. Hon. Chis Smith, NuLab's former Culture Minister, is the latest liberal to bemoan the decline of the West. As a gay Christian socialist he fails to understand that Europe is great DESPITE Christianity and its bastard offspring, liberal individualism. His proposed solution – yet more liberal individualism – is guaranteed to finally destroy our civilization.

Smith and Richard Koch have a new book out – SUICIDE OF THE WEST. In it they propose that the West has succeeded for 6 major reasons: Christianity, Optimism, Science, Economic Growth, Liberalism and Individualism. It's a mystery how it took two men to come up with this drivel. Richard Koch is a “management consultant” and previous author of trite self-help manuals in the tradition of Dale Carnegie's HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE, only not so original.

Let's see how Smith & Koch's analysis stands up to by far the greatest current threats to European cultural integrity; resurgent Islam and environmental degradation:

Christianity - How this weak religion preaching universalism, loving your enemy and turning the other cheek will save us from Islam is anyone's guess. The Christian establishment in Britain increasingly champions the 'rights' of immigrants and refugees above those of the indigenous population. Only last month, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor held a rally for illegal immigrants in front of Westminster Cathedral where he declared, "as far as the Catholic Church is concerned, you are Londoners". Meanwhile Belgian churches provide sanctuary to illegal third world Muslim refugees (“sans papiers”) who pray to Allah in the aisles (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1064), with the support of Catholic bishops.

Optimism – complacency more like! (see Economic Growth, below)

Science – Western science grew out of a pagan outlook, first in Ancient Greece, then more recently with the re-discovery of pagan thinking and knowledge during the Renaissance. Newton and Darwin may ostensibly have been Christian (at first, at least), but Newtonian physics and Darwinian evolution owe nothing to the Bible and everything to the open, progressive thinking encouraged by European paganism – the Faustean/ Promethean Spririt.

Economic Growth – The very last thing this planet needs is more “economic growth” in it's present consumer-capitalist form. Smith and Koch would have us gasping for polluted air while drowning in a rising sea of toxic filth.

Liberalism – The profound error of liberalism – the reign of quantity against quality - is too vast a subject to tackle in a couple of sentences. Either you get it, or you don't. Smith and Koch don't.

Individualism – here's the nonsensical notion of the Tabula Rasa revived. Real individuals are always the products of particular cultures and communities, and it is those cultural communities alone which can give meaning and definition to the individual. To be fully human (e.g. to speak a language, appreciate art etc.) we must be part of a culture, which always takes precedence over us as individuals.

What's so galling about all this is that Chris Smith, Baron of Finsbury, was in a position, at least for a while, to be able to do something practical. He had power as a Cabinet Minister, and he squandered it. Only now are we beginning to understand how fast the downward spiral to destruction accelerated during Blair's first Cabinet 1997-2001, during Chris Smith's watch. Smith is as much in the dark as he ever was.

Britain's failing plutocratic elite

2006-05-13T07:50:00.000-07:00

Whoever it is who runs this country, you can be sure as Hell they hate the ordinary British public. Every decision they make they get wrong (at least for us).

Plane hi-jackers? Let them in!
Dangerous (foreign) prisoners? Let them out!
Greenhouse gasses/ global warming? Build more airport runways!
Rising sea-levels? Build along the Thames estuary!
Increasing Balkanization? Build more faith schools! Back more immigration!
Equal Opportunities Minister? Ruth Kelly!
Public Enquiry for 7/7? You must be joking!

I could go on; Iraq, Iran, global “free-trade” plundering...These venal, complacent cowards keep on kicking the British public in the head.

2003 may have marked the furthest limits of the Anglo-American Atlanticist Zionist attempt at a New World Order: since the Iraq War their agenda has begun to unravel with increasing momentum on three fronts.

Firstly, their political credibility is shot to pieces. They made the unforgivable mistake of initially choosing the wrong enemy (Saddam Hussein instead of home-grown Islamism in Europe; the enemy within) and then compounded the error with lies about WMD to bolster their arguments. As Carl Schmitt argued, “To the State as a political entity belongs the jus belli, i.e. the possibility of deciding in a concrete situation upon the enemy and the ability to fight him with the power emanating from the entity. As long as a politically united people is prepared to fight for its existence, independence and freedom on the basis of a decision emanating from the political entity, this specifically political question has primacy over the technical means by which the battle will be waged, the nature of the army's organization, and what the prospects are for winning the war.” It is this jus belli that Bush and Blair singularly lack.

Secondly, the Iraq War aftermath has exposed the military incompetence and ineffectiveness of the wasteful armies that “pacify”, in the name of democracy and human rights, for the New World Order.

Thirdly, and most worryingly for the plutocratic elite, their shoddy plans of global consumer capitalist materialism, hawked around the world's markets over the past 30 years with increasing shrillness, are beginning to look threadbare and tattered. Much of South America is already in open revolt. Their bloodstained blueprints cannot withstand the coming environmental, economic, political and demographic storms, or what Guillaume Faye has memorably called “the convergence of catastrophes”.

Soon, we will see the end of the vicious dog-eat-dog capitalism that we tolerate in the West, and which is doing so much to destroy our erstwhile beautiful continent and planet. As I said at the end of my Aryan Futurism speech last year, “Since 1945, the liberal capitalist world-view has become so pervasive and absolute that only absolute rebellion can guarantee success.”

The Oera Linda Bok

2006-05-04T12:41:00.000-07:00

(I was stung by unfounded accusations of misogyny after a recent posting to the gay.com newsboards. Rather than stamp my feet like a toddler screaming “It’s not true, it's not fair!”, I am directing your attention to the OERA LINDA book, matriarchy in prehistoric Europe, and how they are in perfect accord with the ideology of the European New Right and my own ARYAN FUTURISM.)

MISOGYNY VERSUS MATRIARCHY

“As heirs to the only people never to have enslaved its women New Rightists oppose all that falls under the category of misogyny.” Michael O’Meara NEW CULTURE NEW RIGHT (2004)

In addition to acknowledging the obvious and decisive contribution to British and European creative success of such women as Sappho, Boudica, Eleanor of Aquataine, Catherine de Medici, Elizabeth I, Catherine the Great and Queen Victoria, a book that has profoundly influenced my ideology of ARYAN FUTURISM is the OERA LINDA Book (or Bok in Frisian), which purports to reproduce in black and white the laws of a matriarchal, pan-European civilization which prospered for thousands of years, many centuries ago. If the OERA LINDA is true, then all our preconceptions about prehistoric Europe collapse. In English, it has been incorporated into THE OTHER ATLANTIS by Roger Scrutton (Neville Spearman/ Sphere 1977/1979). The sensational implications of this book are best conveyed by simply quoting from the front and back cover:

“THE OTHER ATLANTIS: Astounding revelations of the secrets of Atland, long-lost imperial capital of the North.

THE LAND BEYOND THE NORTH WIND – CRADLE OF CIVILISATION
This truly staggering and crucial book unlocks the secrets of an amazing forgotten civilisation. From the author’s brilliant re-examination of an ages-old Nordic manuscript comes stunning proof of a super-race who:

*Ruled a huge island-continent north of Britain called Atland – the ‘Old Land’

*Colonised as far as India, Peru, Egypt and Greece – founding the Athenian state and giving the world democracy

*Bred real-life heroes, adventurers and priestesses who later became mythical deities like Neptune, Odin and Freya

*Used Britain as a penal colony

*Were all but destroyed by a cosmic cataclysm in 2193B.C.”

So what’s all this got to do with matriarchy? Here’s a quote from the actual text of the OERA LINDA, with everything in square brackets taken verbatim from the OTHER ATLANTIS Glossary of Names, Titles and Terms:

“THESE ARE THE LAWS ESTABLISHED FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CITADELS

1. Whenever a citadel is built, the lamp belonging to it must be lighted at the original lamp in Texland [Place named in honour of Frya’s laws where a citadel was built and the Tex inscribed upon its walls], and that can only be done by the mother.

2. Every mother shall appoint her own maidens. She may even appoint those who are mothers in other towns.

3. The mother of Texland may appoint her own successor, but should she die without having done so, the election shall take place at a general assembly of the whole nation.

4. The mother of Texland may have twenty-one maidens and seven assistants, so that there may always be seven to attend the lamp day and night. She may have the same number of maidens who are mothers in other towns.

5. If a maiden wishes to marry, she must announce it to the mother, and immediately resign her office, before her passion shall have polluted the light.

6. For the service of the mothers and each of the Burgtmaidens [Literally, ‘borough-maid’. Chief of the Council of Virgins, in charge of twenty-one maidens and seven apprentices, custodians of the eternally-burning lamp] there shall be appointed twenty-one townsmen – seven civilians of mature years, seven warriors of mature years, and seven seamen of mature years.

7. Out of the seven three shall retire every year, and shall not be replaced by members of their family nearer than the fourth degree.

8. Each shall have three hundred young townsmen as defenders.

9. For this service they must study Frya’s Tex and the laws. From the sages they must learn wisdom, from the warriors the art of war, and from the sea-kings the skill required for distant voyages.”

It carries on, in a similarly evocative FUTURAMA ‘Planet of the Amazons’ vein for another 15 bureaucratic rules, but it is these last two rules, rules 8 & 9, which particularly intrigue me because they appear to refer to the Aryan tradition of MANNERBUND, which is a highly important concept in ARYAN FUTURISM.

The authenticity of the OERA LINDA book is moot: it was inherited by a Royal Netherlands Dockyards master shipwright in 1848, and he handed it over to a librarian at the Leeuwarden Provincial Library in 1867, who in turn presented it at the Frisian Society meeting of February 1871, after which it was reviewed in newspapers and published (the names of all the above individuals involved are recorded and documented). It was first published in English in 1876 by Trubner and Co..In the 1920s-30s various alleged forgers came forward, but the debate rumbles on and the latest state-of-play is available via a search on Google.

Frankly, even if it’s not authentic, it’s still a true product of what psychologist Carl Jung called the “racial unconscious”; it is imbued with Aryan archetypes such as the depiction of an organic, tri-partite culture (first function: sages, second function: warriors, third function: explorers, seamen, navigators and fishermen), the importance of the number three and the construction/ deconstruction/ reconstruction dialectic, Freedom, and the Faustian Will to Overcome, Hyperborea/ Thule and the Aryan Polar Mythology of the Black Sun.

In Aryan ideology everything is connected and consistent. It is the intellectual equivalent of Fortress Europe – as demonstrated in the faultless non-dualist philosophy from Vedanta Hinduism and Buddhism, through Platonism and Neo-Platonism to Nineteenth Century European Romanticism. A rather feeble, misunderstood echo of this grand worldview can be heard in the glib feminist and GLF (Gay Liberation Front) slogan of the Sixties and Seventies, “the personal is the political”.

OERA LINDA is also entirely consistent with the recent ideas of Indo-European archaeologists such as the Lithuanian professor Marija Gimbutas, or Disney (love that! Pass the spirit-level and bucket, Pluto) Professor of Archaeology at Cambridge Colin Renfrew, author of ARCHAEOLOGY AND LANGUAGE: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. It also appears to be in accordance with discoveries made in central Europe in 2005 when The Independent announced discoveries of 7,000-year-old citadels in Germany, and not forgetting the spectacular and beautiful Namur Disc – the first sky-chart ever made.

In 1871 when the OERA LINDA book was first made public, none of this was known, and “Aryan” was a word in the process of being popularized by the philologist and translator of the Zoroastrian ZEND AVESTA Max Muller. It was nothing more than an obscure term from linguistics. Only after WW2 with the research by Indo-Europeanists like Alain Danielou, Georges Dumezil, the Romanian anthropologist Mircea Eliade, and Ralph Metzner, did the full extent of the Aryan weltanschauung: spiritual, mythological, political, cultural and ideological, start to become more clearly apparent. This post-War research favours claims that OERA LINDA is authentic.

It is also consistent with New Right Archeo-Futurism and my comrade Constantin von Hoffmeister’s NATIONAL FUTURISM.

Just as interesting and confirmatory are the similarities between OERA LINDA and a book by Jurgen Spanuth called ATLANTIS OF THE NORTH. First published in German in 1976 by Grabert-Verlag (I have the English hardback printed three years later by Book Club Associates/ Sidgwick and Jackson). Although Spanuth, a local North Sea adventurer and explorer of the “the riddle of the sands” region east of Dogger Bank, appears unaware of OERA LINDA, nonetheless the parallels between Atland and his Atlantis are striking. He locates the centre of his advanced, prehistoric, maritime Hyperborean culture on the island of Heligoland (“Holy Island” in ancient Germanic) in the North Sea, just a few hundred miles east of the OERA LINDA’s Hyperborean Atland. He also claims that Heligoland was much bigger before a cosmic event caused massive changes to the sea-coasts of northwest Europe, most probably the result of a comet strike/ tsunami in 1200bce. The OERA LINDA dates the cosmic event/ sinking of Atland to 2193bce.

Lesbians

You’d think that a document detailing a fully-functioning, prehistoric, pan-European matriarchal civilization would be of some interest to today’s lesbian feminists. I’ve never been aware of any such interest, but as a male homosexual I’m not in the best position to judge. So I tried a little experiment and called Gay’s the Word in Marchmont Street (I have fond memories of witnessing one of HM Customs and Excise periodic raids one afternoon in the mid-80s – I think they were targeting Philip Core and Mapplethorpe – both at the shop premises and at Mount Pleasant PO Sorting Office).

After I recounted the story of OERA LINDA, a friendly chap explained to me that he had never heard of it, never had inquiries about it, not in the last year at any rate, and it did not appear on their database. Not a sausage. Nada. I know first-hand what it’s like to be working in a bookshop in the run-up to the seasonal splurge, so I appreciate his fairly exhaustive efforts at tracking down this obviously unmentionable title about European prehistoric matriarchy. I’d have better luck getting an original parchment copy of the “mad Arab” Abdul Alhazred’s legendary book of dead names: The Necronomicon.

Although OERA LINDA is consistent with the latest archaeological research, and with the New European Right worldview, it is in no way consistent with the politically-correct, stripped-pine, hushed halls and rarefied groves cultivated within modern academia.

The spread of malignant academic theories have strangled free inquiry in our supposed places of learning. Starting with Marxism, then Freudian and the Franz Boas-influenced Anglo-American school of anthropology, then the Frankfurt School, critical theory and the double-whammy of Foucault/ Derrida leading directly to social constructionist sociology, post-modernism and multiculturalism and culminating in that strangest fruit of all: “Queer Studies”, whose tortuous ideology (or lack of it) eventually denies the reality of homosexuality, just as it insidiously denies the reality of sex and race (i.e. biology) and Aryan identity. I wonder how life evolved on their planet? Maybe it’s all done with nano-bots.

Might this be the reason for the OERA LINDA’s continued obscurity and the fact that it’s practically unknown amongst lesbians, who might have the most to learn and gain from it?

Here are two direct quotations from the OERA LINDA text, the first a rather “goldilocks” (at least to my mind – Aryan archetypes again) version of anthropogenesis (ironically, in this context, defined as the “origin of mankind”) and the second on race-mixing and miscegenation, once again with everything in square brackets taken from the OTHER ATLANTIS Glossary of Names, Titles and Terms:

“This is our earliest history.

Wr-alda [the eternal, unchangeable, perfect, almighty essence of all things; in Atland cosmogenesis, the equivalent of an unknowable God. Literally, the ‘Old Ancient’ or ‘Oldest Being’] who alone is eternal and good, made the beginning. Then commenced time. Time wrought all things, even the earth. The earth bore grass, herbs and trees, all useful and all noxious animals. All that is good and useful she brought forth by day, and all that is bad and injurious by night.

After the twelfth Juulfeest [Midwinter Celebration of Frya’s Day, when cakes were baked in representation of the Juul, or wheel of the sun. It was form Juul that Frya formed letters to write down her laws, probably the origin of runes. Juulfeest is doubtless the origin of the so-called pagan Yuletide, upon which the later festival of Christmas was grafted.] she brought forth three maidens:

Lyda [Mother of the black races in Atland mythology.] out of fierce heat.
Finda [yellow people, who came out of the East.] out of strong heat.
Frya [Mother of the fair (white) races in Atland mythology. Probably the prototype for the Norse goddess of love. Freyja, sister of Frey, god of peace and fruitfulness.] out of moderate heat.

When the last came into existence, Wr-alda breathed his spirit upon her in order that men might be bound to him. As soon as they were full-grown they took pleasure and delight in the visions of Wr-alda.”

“FRYA’S TEX

8. Meddle not with the people of Lyda, nor of Finda, because Wr-alda would help them, and any injury you inflicted on them would recoil upon your own heads.

9.If it should happen that they come to you for advice and assistance, then it behoves you to help them; but if they should rob you, then fall upon them as fire and sword.

10. If any of them should seek a daughter of yours to wife, and she is willing, explain to her her folly; but if she will follow her lover, let her go in peace.

11. If your son wishes for a daughter of theirs, do the same as to your daughter; but let not either one or the other ever return among you, for they would introduce foreign morals and customs, and if these were accepted by you, I could no longer watch over you.”

Finally, I have some previous essays and posts to New Right/ Euro-pagan news and discussion groups which explains more fully some of the above concepts, in particular the European New Right FUTURIST SPECTRUM (which I believe breaks new ground), a more exhaustive explanation of Aryan bio-culturalism, and what I mean by “Aryan” in ARYAN ORIGINS, and HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE MANNERBUND.

HOW THE NEW RIGHT WILL SAVE THE WORLD

2006-04-24T13:01:00.000-07:00

The Convergence of Catastrophes and how European Identitarians can save Europe and the world from disaster.

The European New Right/ European Identitarian movement, and the subsequent establishment of IMPERIUM EUROPA, is the only defense we have against what Guillaume Faye and others have called a “convergence of catastrophes”. Any one of these catastrophes on its own is enough to bring down our scientific industrial global civilization. Have no doubt that the aftermath of any of these pitfalls will be a brutal world of tribal warfare, anarchic robber barons, squalid living conditions, starvation and possible extinction.

While the mainstream parties, from Hang'Em High Tories to Trotskyite transsexuals and Greens, continue to bury their heads in the sand and ignore the problems caused by a rising population and diminishing resources, the New Right is the only movement willing to face up to the challenges before us, and by overcoming those challenges with courage, reason and without cruelty, we will save far more lives that would otherwise be lost in the chaos of disintegration. Far more lives are currently threatened by the stupidity and short-sightedness of liberal universalists, greedy capitalists and deluded multiculturalists than will ever be put in jeopardy by the New Right.

By far the worst of these catastrophes, in my opinion, is relentless environmental degradation: global warming, pollution and endocrine disrupting chemicals, deforestation, the stripping of the seas etc.. Global warming is the threat most likely to trigger the collapse, but a scenario with an unexpected environmental impact, perhaps a mass extinction of a vitally important animal or plant, would cause a similar result.

Only last week we watched David 'chameleon' Cameron FLYING to an isolated Norwegian glacier to say a few words about global warming, while Chancellor Brown FLEW to New York to give another speech about climate change and how we should stop leaving our TVs on stand-by overnight. The next day, after oil had passed the $75-per-barrel barrier for the first time, Brown was on the box again demanding increased production and more exploration for oil! How about some joined-up thinking, Chancellor?

The second of these converging catastrophes is the inherent instability of global free trade and the drive for profit at any expense, combined with severe depletion of resources, Peak Oil and the US twin-deficit. We are currently “enjoying” the longest-sustained period of economic growth since Britain became an industrial nation (as Brown constantly reminds us); but there are plenty of reasons for thinking that neo-liberal Britain and the world will not survive another downturn in world trade.

The third of these catastrophes is continuing mass migration from the third world into Europe. With the growth of ethnic minority communities, the potential for cultural misunderstanding, intolerance and intra-communal violence also grows. The true nightmare of multiculturalism would be exposed for all to see only after an economic collapse. By that stage Europe, like Humpty Dumpty, may be impossible to put together again so we must try our hardest to manage the transition to sustainable development in as ordered and disciplined manner as possible. Only a command economy directed by the IMPERIUM EUROPA will have sufficient reach and power to impose necessary order.

These are the big three threats; environmental, economic, and demographic. But something as trivial or left-field as the break-up of the EU, or a terrorist incident, or bird flu or SARS, or OPEC deciding to trade in Euros, could be enough to tip the world – and your life – spiralling into the abyss.

Only the New Right has a vision and a programme bold enough to avert these disasters, through its idea of an IMPERIUM EUROPA powerful enough to re-assert political above economic control, where the long-term interests of the whole nation Europa have replaced the narrowly destructive motives of the current unrepresentative plutocratic elite.

BEYOND EUROPE

Once the IMPERIUM and European autarky is established, the consequences of Europe pulling-out of world free trade will be dramatic. All other continents and regions would be forced to confront their continuing slavish acceptance of the Zionist Atlanticist New World Order. The challenge to complacency and consumer capitalist stagnation can only be to the benefit of the populations of those regions. Environmental concerns and sustainable development, previously crowded out by neo-liberalisms single-minded pursuit of profit, will once again occupy a pivotal status.

BETRAYAL

I can't imagine a worse betrayal than to allow for decades mass immigration from countries and civilizations completely incompatible with our own, and then to start unprovoked and unjustified wars with those very same countries and civilizations.

I can't think of a better way of deliberately sowing discord; locally, nationally and across the whole planet. I can't think of a better way of spreading distrust, violence and hatred. I can't think of an experiment that is more likely to degenerate into savage blood-letting than multiculturalism.

Can you?

FOR THOSE THAT ALREADY KNOW

Lady Renouf made an important point at the New Right meeting in London in April – one that I don't think has been emphasized enough.

The raising of awareness in our folk, and the subsequent radical transformation which I believe we all hope to see, can be achieved peacefully, without bloodshed.

It is our enemies who wish to destroy Europe with their policy of mass immigration and ethnic Balkanizaton, promising a future of endless tribal war.

By staying aware and speaking the truth, we are the only people to offer a viable alternative to the nightmare of a continent faced with dramatic environmental change and limited resources spiraling into a savage bloodbath, with different religions and races at each other's throats.

We should be proud that our solutions are rational and embedded deep within the European psyche. Our enemies like to portray us as unthinking violent thugs, but we can show that the implementation of New Right ideas across Europe – the establishment of an Imperium – will save lives, unlike the
abysmal prospect offered by multiculturalists.

Race and Consciousness

2006-04-19T08:48:00.000-07:00

Our consciousness is mediated by our race and culture, just as white light changed into colour by going through a prism. The light is still light, but it has undergone a literally indescribable transformation (remember, our experience of colour is a uniquely subjective experience, despite understanding in theory about wavelength and even quantum mechanics).

Aryan metaphysics is non-dualist, everything is consciousness, yet that consciousness is rarely encountered by us in its pure white form – the light before it enters the prism. Maybe some have encountered it; Meister Eckhart, Theresa of Avila, Wordsworth and Shelley. Instead, what we see in and around us is consciousness coloured by a myriad different factors: generation of birth, sex, class, race, religion, and of course most dramatically of all by species...or mode of existence for inanimate objects.

Hans Bluher and the Wandervogel

2006-04-04T16:21:00.000-07:00

Text of HANS BLUHER AND THE WANDERVOGEL talk from sixth New Right meeting in London, February 2006.

Good afternoon comrades,

This afternoon I will be talking about the neglected figure of Hans Bluher, a little about his life, the intellectual tradition from whence he came, how he revolutionized that tradition, and finally a little on his influence and potential influence.

Hans Bluher championed the cultural significance of homosexuality and the Mannerbund. He won a widespread following, first with readers of Adolf Brand’s DER EIGENE and the nascent German youth movement, notably the Wandervogel, then later with the State.

Bluher was born in Freiburg in Schlesien in 1888. His birthday was yesterday, 17 February, when he would have been 118 years old. In 1912 he was the first man to write a history of the Wandervogel – the contemporary German youth movement. His history was published as a series of three pamphlets, the third of which was called DIE DEUTSCHE WANDERVOGELBEWEGUNG ALS EROTISCHES PHANOMEN. In 1913 he set up the Jung Wandervogel with Wilhelm Jansen, which, unlike most of the rest of the Wandervogel, was male-only. In 1917 he wrote the first volume of his most important book, outlining his masculinist theory in DIE ROLLE DER EROTIK IN DER MANNLICHEN GESELLSCHAFT: Eine Theorie der Menschlichen Staatsbildung, followed two years later with the second volume. As Bluher said at the time, “Before this book the idea of basing man's existence in the State on Eros has never been coherently pursued”. During the Nazi period he was subject to a Schreibverbot, and died peacefully in Berlin in 1955.

Bluher is generally though of as within the masculinist, or men's movement tradition of thought, but in fact he represents a major break, or development. In Germany at the turn of the last century, there were three main groupings within the men's movement:

Firstly, the intellectual tradition derived from Otto Weininger and the teaching tradition from Dr. Gustav Wyneken, which Bluher was to revolutionize.

Second, the Gemeinschaft der Eigenen (Community of the Self-Owners/ Special) founded officially by Adolf Brand in 1902 and which published its own magazine, Der Eigene, from 1899-1931. Brand and Der Eigene championed the anarchism of Max Stirner, as well as Bluher's theories about the decisive role of the Mannerbund – ancient warrior-band – in the creation of the State. Of course, no-one ever argued that these Mannerbund were exclusively homosexual, simply that homosexuality was not the moral issue it was to become with the arrival of Judeo-Christianity. Wilhelm Jansen, who co-founded the Gemeinschaft with Brand, was introduced to the Wandervogel by Bluher, where he later became an important leader.

The third part of the men's movement was grouped around the romantic poet Stefan George's Cosmic Circle in the Schwabing suburb of Munich, and included such figures as Ludwig Klages and Alfred Schuler. They idealized the Emperor Hadrian's lover Antinous and took their view of history from Johann Jakob Bachofen's Mutterrecht, espousing a prehistoric, matriarchal society. The Cosmic Circle was to have an international impact via D.H. Lawrence.

In the men's movement intellectual tradition, Otto Weininger was the first of these masculinists, whose influential book GESLECHT UND CHARACTER (SEX AND CHARACTER) was written as a reaction against Bachofen’s DAS MUTTERRECHT. Bachofen, like anthropologist Marija Gimbutas more recently, had proposed an original matriarchal pre-historic culture in Europe. Instead, Weininger ascribed gender characteristics from Absolute Manhood to Absolute Womanhood to different nations. Weininger also suggested a complimentary/ supplementary theory of desire which ultimately derived from Plato; he develops the idea of an algebra of sexual attraction. Weininger killed himself in Beethoven's house the same year that his book was published, in 1903, while his book gained in notoriety. Ford Maddox Ford remembers SEX AND CHARACTER as one of the most sensational books of the early Twentieth Century, which was still being discussed under hushed breaths in the polite salons of European capitals three years after publication. It was studied by Dietrich Eckart, ended up on Hitler's bookshelves, and Julius Evola provided an introduction to the 1956 Italian edition. A rather unusual audience for a Viennese Jew! SEX AND CHARACTER provoked Evola to write his own METAPHYSICS OF SEX two years later. Weininger’s views can be summed up in his following quote, “for true sexual union it is necessary that there come together a complete male and a complete female”.

Heinrich Schurtz, author of the best-seller ALTERKLASSEN UND
MANNERBUNDE (1902) was a major contributor to the men's movement.
In this comparative cultural study Schurtz expounded his theory of the dual primary impulses in man, the sexual and the social drive.

Weininger was followed by Benedict Friedlaender, whose most important book DIE RENAISSANCE DES EROS URANIOS (1904) condemned Plato for the separate categorizations of homosexual and heterosexual, as well as the “erotic monopoly of women and the priesthood”. Friedlaender represents the last, failed attempt to reconcile patriarchy and the bourgeois family with homo or bi-sexuality, as in the Hellenic ideal.

Bluher’s significant break with previous Masculinists and sexologists was on two major fronts, partly as a result of the men's movement's encounter with Freud, and partly a result of his re-interpretations of Heinrich Schurtz. Bluher unsurprisingly was highly critical of Freud, with whom he corresponded, and declared in answer to Freud’s theory of repression that, “The repression of sexuality does not result from culture, but the reverse, culture results from the repression of sexuality. To be human and to have culture are identical.” According to Andrew Hewitt’s POLITICAL INVERSIONS, it was this encounter with Freud, and not Bluher’s on-going involvement with political philosophy, that proved decisive.

Hans Bluher abandoned theories of sexuality based on either biology, or on complimentary or supplementry mathematics grounded in the male-female duality. Instead, Bluher went back to basics and insisted on a single unified consciousness as being the source of sexuality.

For Bluher, it is sexuality – the putative biological origin – that is an abstraction, and eros – the cultural facts of desire – that proves the sole concrete ground for analysis. Of course, this approach disarms the objection that homosexuality is “against nature.” To quote Bluher:

“It is not something that needs to be explained, but rather something that – as eros – makes explanation and meaning possible.”
“Eros is a meaningful and meaning-constitutive phenomenon that can be reduced neither to mere symptom, nor to biology.”
“Whenever sexuality makes itself noticed in man it has already been taken up into the workings of eros and thereby acquired a meaning.”
“Sexuality creates (indeed must create) two fully developed, originary and indestructible types of man; one desires men, the other, women.”
“Eros is the philosophy of the particular.”

This assertion of the supremacy of culture stresses the first major gap that had opened up between Bluher and previous Masculinists, and at the same time, brings Bluher into line with modern European New Right thinking, especially with the philosophical anthropologist Arnold Gehlen’s notion of the individual as being bio-cultural, an inseparable mix of race and culture. Bluher rejected previous biological theories from liberals like Karl Ulrichs, and Magnus Hirschfeld's Scientific Humanitarian Committee as well as Masculinists like Weininger and Friedlander

Hans Bluher versus Fred Flintstone

Bluher’s second break with previous sexologists and political philosophers was his privileging of the Mannerbund: by undermining the accepted male/ female polarity he destroyed the foundations of the liberal state, wedded as it was (and is) to domestic bourgeois respectability. For convenience, I like to refer to the liberal view of history and evolution, where the rational liberal individual springs fully-formed as if from thin air as the “Fred Flintstone” argument.
According to social contract theory, and Hanna-Barbera cartoons, individuals in the original State of Nature are rational, autonomous and self-interested. So Fred decides to form a Social Contract with his equally rational neighbours, including Barney Rubble. [The analogy isn't quite exact, in that Fred is a worker in a quarry rather than as an agrarian worker-owner, but Fred still lives in a market society much like our own.] It is this grotesque cartoon figure from the fetid imaginations of Jean-Jaques Rousseau, John Locke and Adam Smith that has been the target of successful pot-shots by anti-liberals from Charles Maurras to the New Right, but only Hans Bluher has the audacity and logic to target both Fred AND Wilma.
Bluher rejected this notion that Aryan culture was created spontaneously by domestic individuals and nuclear families like Fred and Wilma, Betty and Barney or Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm. Instead he advanced the idea of the Mannerbund – the warrior band – as the principle catalyst for the formation of societal structure and the State. Further, Bluher declared that the State was an expression of “Objective Will”. As he said, “The State is not simply the the social construction placed on nature, but rather the political phenomenon which itself defines a specifically human nature.”

However, he did accept that other, non-Aryan civilizations, notably the Semitic, may have originated from the domestic nuclear family, and have been stamped accordingly. Julius Evola was to take this idea and run with it.

For proof of his argument, Bluher cited Sparta, the sacred Seven Hundred of Thebes and chivalric knights, squires and Templars, whose echo across the centuries can be heard in Wagner's PARSIFAL. Since his time, and especially since WW2, research and information about the Mannerbund has expanded considerably. In 1934 Otto Hofler (Hoefler) published KULTISCHE GEHEIMBUNDE DER GERMANEN (Frankfurt/ Main 1934) about the Herulians and Wotan's warrior-bands, then after the War Indo-Europeanist scholars such as Georges Dumezil with his three-function-theory, Jan de Vries and Alain Danielou lifted Indo-European studies to still greater heights. More recently French historian Bernard Sergent with his books HOMOSEXUALITE INITIATIQUE DANS L'EUROPE ANCIENNE and HOMOSEXUALITY IN GREEK MYTH, Alby Stone, Kris Kershaw, Steve Pollington, and Connell O’Donovan have all shed light on the significance of the Mannerbund. I’ve written about this separately in my Mannerbund essays, save to say the evidence for the Mannerbund origins of Aryan culture is increasingly overwhelming, and makes sense logically. Bluher emphasized the Mannerheld – the male hero who holds the band together, a leader who in Max Weber's categorization exercises charismatic authority, and is represented as an archetype in such semi-divine figures as Hercules, “Through the force of his attraction, which he exerts on young and old among his warriors, he can obtain the greatest sacrifices, the most tremendous efforts, and the most splendid successes.”

Influence on Wandervogel

The first modern youth movements started before 1896 as entirely autonomous from adults, necessarily so because they were largely motivated as a reaction against the gross materialism of the Kaiserreich. Groups of youngsters would meet up at each others' houses before taking hikes into the woods or mountains, to discuss how to make Germany and Europe a better place. Only later did adults like Hans Bluher in Germany or Baden-Powell in England become involved.

The Wandervogel name, which was adopted collectively from 1896, is most likely taken from Book 17 of Walt Whitman’s LEAVES OF GRASS, titled “Birds of Passage”. This was not Whitman's only contribution to German thought at the time; Adolf Brand's men's movement was called “Gemeinschaft der Eigenen” - the Community of Self-Owners – which although taken from the philosophy of Max Stirner, has a distinctly Whitmanesque resonance. Bluher himself refers to the Wandervogel as a “confederation of friendship” - a direct quote from Whitman .

Bluher introduced Adolf Brand's colleague Wilhem Janssen (1866-1943) to the Wandervogel at the turn of the last century, and in 1910 they together formed Jung Wandervogel, which unlike most of the rest of the Wandervogel never admitted girls as members.

Carl Jung gave a vivid account of the early Wandervogel in his famous 1936 essay Wotan. Jung argued that each race had its own collective unconscious and archetypes, and for the Teutons Wotan was in charge: “We have seen Wotan come to life in the Jungendbewegung (youth movement), and the blood of several sheep was shed in the sacrifices which celebrated the very dawn of his rebirth. Armed with Rucksack and lute, blond youths, and sometimes also girls, were to be seen as restless wanderers on every road from the North Cape to Sicily, true servants of the roving god...The German youths who celebrated the solstice were not the first to hear a rustle in the primeval forest of the unconscious. They were anticipated by Nietzsche, Shuler, Stefan George, and Klages. The literary tradition of the Rhine and the country south of the Main has a classical form that cannot be easily shaken off. Every interpretation that comes from that region, therefore, is inclined to return to a classic model, to antique intoxication and exuberance, i.e. to Dionysus, the peur aeternus and the cosmogonic eros.” [NB: On the Cosmogonic Eros . Ludwig Klages 1922].

The most important event in the history of the Wandervogel was 11 October 1913 when the Jungendbewegung Free German Youth Movement was summoned to a mass-meeting on the Meissner Heights outside Kassel. A manifesto was issued, which stated in part, ”German Youth no longer intended to remain a dependency of the older generation, excluded from public life and relegated to a passive role. It seeks, independently of the commands of convention, to give shape and form to its own life. It strives after a lifestyle, corresponding to its youth, which will make it possible to take itself and its activities seriously and to integrate itself as a special factor in the general work of culture.” Ludwig Klages from the Cosmic Circle composed “Mensch und Erde” (Man and Earth) for the occasion, while others sang from Hans Breuer's youth movement songbook published the same year. What was called the “Meissner Formula” strove “to shape life through self-responsibility and wholehearted sincerity”.

After World War One the Wandervogel lost little of it's early idealism, but its cohesiveness was tested. [St. Ch.] Waldecke wrote in Der Eigene in 1925 that it had now condensed into 4 distinct streams, comprising of:
1. Free German, often Anarchist. It was this bunch that descended directly from the Meissner Heights meeting in 1913, and these were the most direct inheritors of the initial Wandervogel inspiration. This group was bolstered by an influx from Dr. Gustav Wyneken's Free School Communities. This branch of the Wandervogel was closely associated with Der Weisse Ritter house in Berlin, from 1921 publisher of The White Knight newspaper for the youth movement.
2. Proletarian-identified leftist movements, whether Anarchist, Marxist or later Stalinist, with the emphasis on class war rather than learning.
3. Christian youth movements that were more Catholic and Protestant youth social work groups than youth movements. These Christian missions were the last to be absorbed into the Hitler Youth.
4. Der Jungdeutsche Orden or Jungdo. The Young German Order was founded by Artur Mahraun at around the same time as the Kapp Putsch in May 1920. It appealed to younger elements on the right and promised to revive the pre-War Wandervogel spirit. Based in Kassel, it had expanded to 70,000 when it was banned in early 1921 whereupon it expanded to almost a third-of-a-million (300,000). It's fate, as with most of the other groups, was to be assimilated into the Hitler Youth.

Influence on State
Apart from individuals from the Wandervogel and groups such as Jungdo, the Young German Order becoming involved in nationalist politics, the movement was absorbed almost in its entirety into the Hitler Youth after 1933. Journalist Ludwig Lewisohn of the left-wing American publication NATION wrote in 1933 that the Wandervogel was “the youth movement from which thousands of storm-troopers came...The entire movement is in fact and by certain aspects of its avowed ideology drenched through with homoerotic feeling and practice”.

Alfred Baumler of the Institut fur Pedagogik at the University of Berlin from 1933 initiated some of Bluher and Wyneken's teaching techniques, and at the same time was won over from Bachofen's Mutterrecht to Bluher's Mannerbund hypothesis. After World War Two, Bluher's main theories of Eros and the Mannerbund were decisively rejected in favour of Magnus Hirschfeld's bizarre notions of intermediate sexes and minority rights.

Influence on Julius Evola
For Evola's theories of desire, Otto Weininger's complimentary mathematics is the obvious direct inspiration for the METAPHYSICS OF SEX, and not Bluher's idea of Eros creating meaning. For Evola, as for Carl Jung, the meaning of sex is the spiritual Hieros Gamos – the sacred marriage within the psyche. But in other books, notably REVOLT AGAINST THE MODERN WORLD and MEN AMONGST THE RUINS, Evola was happy to accept the broad outline of Bluher’s Mannerbund hypothesis, and indeed elaborates upon it.

Influence on Yockey
When American activist Francis Parker Yockey was arrested by the FBI in 1960 he was carrying a copy of Weininger's SEX AND CHARACTER in his suitcase. Yockey was such an admirer of Bluher that ten years earlier, in March 1950, he had translated the entire second volume of THE ROLE OF THE EROTIC IN MALE SOCIETIES. No copies remain, although the FBI did get their hands on one in 1952, but his partner of the time, Elsa Dewette, was able to record a few choice snippets:

“The LEAGUE is the proselyte for that way if life that the GREEKS called ETHOS. This word has something to do with the MAN. It gives notice that the man has already pledged his best to the man. Our most essential, super-abundant, purest, and as they say, most selfless performances are, in one way or another, born in the light of a superior man who gave the stimulus to them. Whoever is in the League cannot sink: All are sustained by this utter certainty.

Women strive constantly, WHOLLY to possess a man. That trap-door to oblivion which lies hidden in a well-guarded secret place in her being, demands a sacrifice: In this way, most men go to ruin through their wives.”

According to Dewette, Yockey then commented “I have always said this. My phrase was and remains: Nearly all women bring out the worst in men: the economical and the social.”

Bluher for the Future

Amongst Indo-European scholars, the Mannerbund is now a familiar landmark on the scene, but now is the time for the Mannerbund to emerge from the pages of history and become a vital political force once again. The so-called gay community will be first in the firing line in the coming war between Aryan ideals and those of the monotheists. Unfortunately, they have been especially weakened by cultural Marxism and multiculturalism over the past thirty years; they were targeted for propaganda earlier than the general population (I remember political correctness firmly established throughout the gay community by the very early 1980s), and since then the propaganda from the gay press, academia etc. has been overwhelming and relentless.

I also reckon there are lessons from Jung's Wotan essay. Here's another quote about Wotan, the Germanic god of battle and poetry, “Later, toward the end of the Weimar Republic, the wandering role was taken over by thousands and thousands of unemployed who were to be met everywhere on their aimless journeys. By 1933 the people no longer wandered, they marched in their hundreds of thousands. The Hitler movement brought the whole of Germany to its feet, from the five-year-olds to the veterans, and produced the spectacle of a great migration of people marking time. Wotan the wanderer was awake.”

French Post-modernist Paul Virilio has called this process “Dromology” and considered it vital to the success of the French Revolution, as well as the 1933 German Revolution. I believe our European civilization, which has been stupefied for sixty years, is about to march along that road again, and vital to those young marchers will be the organizational flair and heroic inspiration of the Mannerbund.

Aryan Futurism: The Vision

2006-03-28T05:23:00.000-08:00

This is the text of my ARYAN FUTURISM speech, delivered to the New Right meeting in central London on 28 May 2005.

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. It’s a great, hot, sunny afternoon, which means it’s clear, and when it’s clear we can see further. So I want to see how far we can see. First I’ll talk about where we could be, what it will look like, why Aryan, why Futurist, and why Imperium - and then I’ll discuss how we could get there: how to re-align folk away from the current corrosive human rights agenda and towards European nationalism and growth.

First – a journey to the absolute elsewhere. Imagine you’re flying high above the Eurasian continent – maybe in a spacecraft. Below, you see primeval forest, as our ancestors knew it, with bears, wolves and the lustrous beauty of Mother Nature restored. Every so often you catch sight one of the crystalline structures, perhaps kilometres high, which stud the verdant landscape from Galway Bay to the Kamchatka peninsular.

These crystalline structures are Arologies, originally imagined by Italian architect Paulo Soleri way back in the 1960s. They are cities, like the future-metropolis in Logan’s Run, or Arthur C. Clarke’s CITY AND THE STARS. Arcologies are completely self-sufficient and ecologically sound. They generate their own power using nuclear fission or, ideally, fusion. Healthy food is produced in plankton and algae factories, while genetically engineered protein means we no longer have to kill sentient animals for food, and we can eat meat with a clear conscience. Arcologies are connected to one another via trans-continental tunnels and air and space ports, and built in such a way that in the event of a planetary catastrophe they can leave Earth and survive in deep space.

Anyone who has not volunteered to perform duties for the State is allowed to leave and return to the Arcology at any stage. They can only take with them whatever food, clothing and weapons they can carry, then find a pleasant spot to build a log cabin, and live the life of a trapper. I imagine that the valleys closer to the Arcology would be more populous than those further away, and that a sort of frontier justice would prevail, something like the environment described in William Burroughs PLACE OF DEAD ROADS. Beyond this hinterland would extend the real wilderness. Our Germanic ancestors had a strong belief in the power of “Utgard” – “the area outside” – the area uninhabited by Gods or men, as opposed to “Midgard” – “Middle Earth” – the civilized world of Gods, men and order. Utgard is where Gods and men face their greatest battles. This “Utgard” is a testing ground for youths from the Arcology, to prove themselves in initiation ceremonies, rituals, drinking bouts, man-hunts and survival skills in the wilderness. Traditional societies have no trouble in channeling youthful boisterousness; Nu Labor hasn’t got a clue and calls them “teenage yobbos”.

Inside the Arcologies, the order and authority of the Imperium prevails. Traditionalist thinkers have given less thought to technological automation than to other, perhaps more pressing matters, but 2 who have are Alexander Raven Thomson and Oswald Mosley, both of the British Union of Fascists. I think in some ways the BUF can act as a more inspiring model than the interwar continental systems, as the liberalism and Humpty Dumpty economics of 30’s British Empire is not so dissimilar to the problems all Europeans face now, whereas Italy and Germany faced specific challenges particular to their time. Thomson was the BUF corporate state theorist, one of whose ideas was motorways, and who won almost 25% of the vote in Bethnal Green in 1937. In his book Civilisation as Divine Superman (1932) Thomson wrote, “civilisation could avoid decay if it adopted as its model the communal organisation of Maeterlinck’s insect communities, ‘super-organisms’ in which individual differentiation took place within a “communal spirit shared by every member of the hive”.

Mosley himself believed the solution to the challenge of automation was the “wage-price mechanism” and autarky, or, as he put it, “the insulated self-contained area freed from the world cost system”.

Economics is from Ancient Greek and simply means “household management”: at its most basic it means being able to provide the material life-support for a society – such things as food, warmth, shelter, and (I would argue) access to communications technology. I believe production of material goods should be limited, and rationed by the State exercising a Command Economy. The economy operates on the level of society, not culture. I don’t think economics is as important as politics, and nothing for serious-minded men to fall out over. There are lots of reasons why I personally believe a planned economy is superior to a free-market economy, but here are the main 3:

1. A command economy is the most efficient way of providing a population with the basic essentials for living. Economies of scale, standardization and above all automation would free vast numbers of workers from the meaningless toil of financial and other service industries, to pursue full-time their own individual interests, joining sports clubs, studying, or just drinking and smoking and hanging out with friends. Of course, if a person wants to do something worthwhile, then they can volunteer for State service in a field to which they are suited.
The Neolithic agricultural revolution greatly increased our power over nature, but at the cost of a life of drudgery in the fields for millions of peasants, trapped under the limited horizons of Bronze Age technology. Anthropologists estimate that hunter-gatherers of the stone age only spent about an hour a day working for their survival: the rest was play and contemplation. The industrial revolution increased our ability to manipulate our environment even further, thereby eliminating agricultural labour and, currently, manufacturing labour.

We’ve already had the technology to make this automated utopia a reality for a few decades; what’s stopping us from advancing is consumer capitalism, which is above all a psychological control system. It is propped up by advertising and mass-media to keep everyone’s snouts in the trough. As Buddha (a great Aryan) discovered, the cause of suffering is desire, and desire for more and more material goods (i.e. consumer capitalism) causes more and more suffering and is unsustainable, which leads to my second reason for supporting a command economy:

My second argument is that as limited resources dwindle, we have the option of either rationing, which would lead to the introduction of a planned economy, or leaving the free market as it is. Leaving things as they are would mean only the very richest, most treacherous plutocrats would survive, and they are the very same gangsters (the Windsors, the Bushes etc.) who collaborated the most in destroying Aryan civilization.

Thirdly, command economies seem to be the best at providing military security and guaranteeing technological advance. Britain was forced to adopt a planned economy during WW1 and WW2 to ensure survival. Germany pre-1945 was the most technologically advanced country in the world, the Soviet Union was the first space power and the Americans only got a man to the moon thanks to the state-supported military-industrial complex and Werner von Braun.

To sum up automation in the words of Ernst Junger in Der Arbeiter (1932) “Beyond the democracy of labour, in which the contents of the familiar world will be remoulded and reworked, the outlines can be made out of forms of State which are not comparable to anything that has so far existed. However, what can be predicted is that neither work nor labour will exist in any sense that we have known. The discovery of work as a constituent of abundance and freedom still lies before us…The true contest is for the discovery of a new and unknown world – a discovery more destructive and pregnant with consequences than the discovery of America. It is only with awe that we can look on as man strives to sharpen weapons and hearts in the midst of chaotic upheavals, and see how prepared he is to renounce any simple way out which leads to mere happiness.
To participate in this process and to serve its cause: this is the task with which we are charged.”

We’ve had a glimpse into the future – now I’d like to talk about why Aryan, and why an Imperium.

Only a radical Imperium based on traditional Aryan concepts of synthesis can do justice to the European Faustean spirit. To quote Guillaume Faye, “The old European tradition was always modernist…We don’t stupidly revolt against contemporary Europe, but remain loyal to that which has always been part of Europe”. He is right: the dead hand of 18th century liberalism, which was superseded by continental European political and philosophical thinkers over 2 centuries ago, still clenches the world ever-tighter in its rigor mortis grip.

In MAN AND TECHNICS Spengler wrote, “Now [man] meant not merely to plunder [nature] of her materials, but to enslave and harness her very forces so as to multiply his own strength. This monstrous and unparalleled idea is as old as the Faustean Culture itself. Already in the tenth century we meet with technical constructions of a wholly new sort. Already the steam engine, the steamship, and the air machine are in the thoughts of Roger Bacon and Albertus Magnus. And many a monk busied himself in his cell with the idea of Perpetual Motion.
This last idea never thereafter let go its hold on us, for success would mean the final victory over “God or Nature”, a small world of one’s own creation moving like the great world, by virtue of its own forces and obeying the hand of man alone. To build a world oneself, to be oneself God – that is the Faustian inventor’s dream, and from it has sprung all our designing and re-designing of machines to approximate as nearly as possible the unattainable limit of perpetual motion.”

English philosopher Francis Bacon eloquently expresses the necessary violence of the Faustian spirit in his FABLE OF PROTEUS – which is all about struggle:

“If any skilful minister of nature shall apply force to nature, and by design torture and vex it in order to its annihilation, it on the contrary, being brought to this necessity, changes and transforms itself into a strange variety of shapes and appearances; for nothing but the power of the Creator can annihilate it or truly destroy it… And that method of torturing or detaining will prove the most effective and expeditious which makes use of manacles and fetters, i.e lays hold and works upon matter in the extremist degree”.

These words remind me of the CERN particle accelerator in Switzerland with its huge magnetic forces.

According to the Perennial Tradition, we are consciousness fallen into matter. Aryan civilizations’ creation of technology, Descarte’s “quantifying reductionism” and scientific materialism is a further involution, or sinking, into matter. Our consciousness delves deeper into the Matrix of matter, but I believe this to be Western civilization’s destiny and also our escape. Tradition also tells us that the switch from the dark age, the Kali Yuga, to the Golden Age, the Krita Yuga, is instantaneous. My own guess is that it could be realized with Faster-than-Light travel through the light-barrier, culminating in something like the light-show at the end of Kubrik’s 2001, or the sphere in Event Horizon. W.H. Muller’s 1995 book Polaria explores the esoteric and spiritual side of FTL travel. Of course it may be some other, at present unimaginable, transgression of technology, or spiritual discipline, that facilitates the next stage of our evolution. But when we do this, we can be sure we become something beyond human. An effect of FTL travel is that the traveller exists in all places at all times, which is one of the definitions of a God.
In the famous words of Nietzsche, "Man is a rope, tied between beast and overman--a rope over an abyss...
What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end: what can be loved in man is that he is an overture and a going under...”

Now for the political structure…why an Imperium

Politics is about the direction we want our civilization to grow, and the structures necessary to ensure that growth. For that, I think it’s best to read Indo-Europeanists such as Mircea Eliade, Carl Jung, Alain Danielou and Georges Dumezil who have studied archetypal recurring patterns of Aryan power and Jean Markele who emphasises the importance of synthesis and movement in the Ancient Celtic worldview, similar to Heraclitus.

Aryan Imperium must be a synthesis of that ultimate political polarity – a stable, authoritarian Imperium (represented by Ice) v freedom, creative imagination and the Italian Futurist Marinetti’s idea of speed (all of which can all be characterized as Fire). It needs to be a resolution between settler v nomads, mountain men v mariners. To translate into mythological terms it’s the combination of Muspellheim v Nifleheim which leads to the creation of Ymir, father of Gods and Giants.

Integral to any Aryan Imperium worthy of the name is the Tripartite structure. Alby Stone, another Indo-Europeanist, best describes this trifunctional society as analogous to the human body, the different qualities represented by head, arms and torso.

My own suggestion is this: Emperor rules, in consultation with a Round Table of 12 advisors (like the 12 Olympian Gods or the 12 high Gods of Asgard). All posts are elected and, once elected, last for life. Election is open to all Aryans who have completed a voluntary, time-unspecified service of duty to the State (e.g. in the Armed Forces or hospitals). There’s more about a future volunteerist state in Robert Heinlein’s STARSHIP TROOPERS.

Another useful political concept, current in the European Union but originally developed by the Catholic Church Is Subsidiarity. The tenet holds that nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organisation.

The Imperium has as its primary directive the evolution and progress of Aryan mankind, both as an individual and as a species. The Empire collectively is committed to scientific and technical innovation; evolution of the Overman, and guarantees to provide and maintain all platforms necessary for its development: unlimited resources for scientific research and freedom of speech, education and access to participate encouraged for all Aryans.

You can have an authoritarian State which exhorts free speech; the two are not incompatible. The Kaiserreich is good example. Bismark maintained the noble German tradition of Gedankenfreiheit by letting newspapers publish whatever they wanted and the State could only act retrospectively by suing in the courts.

I think that all Aryans in the Imperium will be freer than ever before, more free possibly than we can imagine. The whole objective of the Imperium is to liberate the creative imagination of each individual, thereby adding their own unique contribution to the ever-expanding empire. Industrial automation is the technological foundation for this ultimate state of freedom.

The principal and defining social relationship of the Imperium is the comrade. Men and women are encouraged to treat each other as brother and sister, homosexuality would be no more remarkable than it was in pagan Europe. We need a re-balancing of the interests of the nation and race against those of the nuclear family. I believe Heinrich Schurtz, author of Alterklassen und Mannerbunde is right, “Schurtz emphasised that the social impulse, the drive to create communities and political institutions, was reserved only to the male. The ‘instinctive sympathy’ between men was the precondition for social life”. Julius Evola, Adolf Brand and Hans Bluher all developed ideas about how the domestic, feminine, comfortable, later bourgeois nuclear family is antithetical to Aryan achievement. For the meantime, all of Europe faces de-population, and replacement by non-Aryans. I’ve read about towns in Germany that have managed to reverse the trend by giving tax-breaks and other encouragements to larger families. Abortion-on-demand of white babies must be outlawed across the continent. The so-called “pensions crisis” is yet another lie designed to keep the public cowered while the Establishment promotes third world immigration. It is easily solved with automation and a planned economy.

A word about language Proto-Indo-European, which scholars have been researching for 150 years now, is the ideal future Lingua Franca, with national languages taught in schools as second languages. Nearly all modern languages in Europe evolved from Indo-European, so not only would we learn the roots and thought processes involved in our own language, but we’d also be learning it for all European languages, making them easier to speak.

Territorial Extent

Eurasia
I imagine an Aryan Imperium stretching from Reykjavik to Vladivostok, including the whole of the European continent, Russia and Siberia. In particular, Aryan Futurists recognize the brutality of Hitlerism against our Slav brothers, and the continual undermining of the Slavic folk by the Western plutocracies and alien infiltration. There are 3 reasons why I feel especially optimistic about Russia and eastern Europe. Firstly, the region has a history of Aryan spirituality and culture going back millennia. Secondly, the region has the greatest concentration anywhere of undiluted Aryans. Thirdly, recent political developments, such as the increasing popularity of Eurasianism and National Bolshevism demonstrate burgeoning biocultural, racial and cultural awareness. Russia must be allowed to take the leading role as a nation in building the Imperium, if she so desires.
From north to south, we can imagine an Aryan homeland extending southward from the North Pole to around 34-36 degrees latitude. That would include Gibraltar, Malta, Crete and Cyprus, but exclude Jerusalem and the Middle East. (I believe this particular exclusion is vital, but others may disagree). The only salient non-Aryan civilizations that extend a little north of this latitude are the Oriental civilizations of China, Korea and Japan. Oriental civilization has a separate destiny from that of the West, we are on different roads, so we should secure their borders with the Imperium amicably, and leave them to their own fate.

Arctic Citadel
To avoid any lingering petty nationalist quarrels, a new capital city can be built in geodesic orbit above the North Pole. Hyperborean Aryans have a prior historic claim to the North Pole (Thule), demonstrated by Carl Jung and Mircea Eliade.

Space above the Polar Axis to be reserved for a 4-square castellated crystal space city, as envisaged in Aryan mythology from Arianrhod’s Fort in Celtic folklore to Mount Meru in Hinduism.
“If you build it, they will come”. You may recognize this quote from Field of Dreams. What I mean by it - is that a civilization needs a goal, a destination to mobilize around in order to demonstrate it’s true greatness. For the Romans it was Pax Augustus and the Golden Age celebrated by Virgil, for the Ancient Egyptians the building of the pyramids, and for the Germans a 1,000 year empire. Goethe tells us that great events cast their shadow before them, and I believe the Aryan mythos, which locates the gods of Asgard at the North Pole, is the shadow of that great event that still lies before us. That event is the transformation of Man into God.

Ringing the Arctic Ocean is a highly desirable consequence of a Eurasian, and eventually circumpolar, Aryan Imperium. If the Arctic was ice-free, then it would have by far the busiest shipping lanes in the world, and correspondingly massive ports and cities. All the other oceans and seas in the world would become backwaters. European sailors have always understood the need for Arctic trade, from the Vikings and Hanseatic League to the adventurers searching for a Northwest passage from the 15th to 19th centuries.

Politically and ideologically, the United States is the catastrophic result of a failed liberal-humanist experiment by 18th century Europeans. Even worse, many of the original white settlers had been driven out of Europe because of their extreme Christian fundamentalism…a fundamentalism that lives on today in the Red Republican states that voted for George W. Bush, and also in their Christian Identity nationalist groups.

If Canada and at least parts of the United States opt to join the Imperium, then we surround the Arctic Ocean completely and it becomes a “mare nostrum” (our sea) in the same way that the Mediterranean became “mare nostrum” for the Romans.

The scientific consensus is that the Arctic will be ice-free by the end of the century, but I’d like to think that by 2100 our technology would have made maritime navigation irrelevant, except for hobbyists; instead we can use airships and inter-continental tunnels for transport.

The Polar Axis City will be the launch-pad for the Aryan Space Empire (which happily has the acronym ASE=from race of Germanic Gods), incorporating the terrestrial Imperium stretching across Eurasia and the Arctic, additional strategic locations on Earth, especially on the Equator for satellite launches/ space elevators, and of course any planets, satellites, planetary systems and regions of space that we occupy. Equatorial bases would be negotiated in friendly consultation with Chinese, Japanese, Indians, Latin Americans and any other culture that survives the collapse of the plutocratic New World Order.
GREEN – HOW TO GET THERE

Political Futurist Party September 1918 Rome “intuits present needs and articulates precisely the consciousness of the whole race in its purging revolutionary momentum. The party can be joined by all Italians, men or women, of any class or age, even if artistic and literary concepts are beyond them”.

How to get there. Our great advantage is that people know this stuff instinctively through what Michael Moynihan has called meta-genetics. Georges Sorel said we need a myth to mobilize the folk, and I say what better myth than the true one, the ones that speak of Aryan origins and destiny, the one that every Aryan knows in their blood.

The French post-modernist Paul Virilo has emphasised the importance of being physically in a place to force change, in his book Speed and Politics. It’s what he calls Dromology, getting people onto the streets, as in the French Revolution or unemployed Germans after 1929-30.

I believe the next step would be to establish “Aryan cultural centres” in the heart of every town and city across the continent. These centres would be much more than just offices – they would have barrack dormitories, bars, sports facilities, libraries, temples or a pantheon to all the Aryan gods (which could also be used as a bar), as well as offices with IT for communications/ propaganda. Rural Cultural centres could provide their urban counterparts with free, organic food, in exchange for new recruits and their labour. I think it’s better to concentrate resources on that sort of practical project (as the Arktion Federation is doing with the Jomsburg farm project), rather than wasting resources on elections and lost deposits. After all, south London has some sort of immigrant legal rights drop-in shop or refugee community centre in every high street, but nothing for the people who built this city.

The function of these cultural centres is to promote Aryan culture, in its broadest sense, and defend our people. Oswald Mosley had something similar in the 1930s (sadly without the pagan temples!) which he called “Black Houses”:

“In the autumn of 1933 it [the B.U.F.] acquired the lease of Whiteland Teachers Training College in the King’s Road, Chelsea, which became know as Black House. It was a cross between an administrative headquarters, social club and army camp. Other Black Houses in the main urban centres were formed on the same model. In the original one, hundreds of members of I Squad or the London Defence Force slept, ate and lived to the sound of the bugle summoning them for reveille (re-valley) meal-times, parades and lights out. They trained in gymnastics, boxing and judo. They roared out in their military-looking vans to defend speakers or rescue them in trouble.”

Instead of judo, I’d suggest some native martial art as researched by Pennick and others.

Recruitment: sci-fi conventions, teenage games magazines, gay scene

I think it’s very important, not just symbolically, that these meeting are taking place in the heart of the parasitic Leviathan, a founder-capital of the New World Order and home to Winston Churchill and the Rothschilds. As you know, London is one of the citadels of multi-racism, global capitalism and everything we hate, and has been for centuries, since Henry VIII, Oliver Cromwell and especially since the 1688 Glorious Revolution and the foundation of the Bank of England. My feeling is if a strong, intelligent, positive Aryan movement can start here and succeed, under the noses of our foes, then it can succeed anywhere.

Finally, I’d like to end with a quote from Ortega y Gasset, “Europeans do not know how to live unless they are engaged in some great enterprise. When this is lacking, they grow petty and feeble and their souls disintegrate.”

Aryan Futurism is for everyone who feels the fire of Aryan aspiration and achievement in their blood. Above all, it is about action for the future.

Aryan Origins

2006-03-28T05:08:00.000-08:00

The correspondence below with the National Futurist leader Constantin von Hoffmeister outlines my thoughts on our origins. Since this exchange, I have learnt of the Paleolithic Continuity Theory of Indo-European Origins, which confirms many of my speculations (http://www.continuitas.com/intro.html)

Hail Constantin,

Yes, I’ve read WAFFEN-SS VERSUS ARYANS. Here’s why I think it’s wrong:

NO ARYAN INVASION OF EUROPE – ARYANS EVOLVED IN EUROPE

Aryans are the branch of mankind that evolved from Cro-Magnons (Homo Sapiens Sapiens). If you accept the diffusionist model of human evolution, then Aryans are the branch of mankind that evolved separately on the western peninsular of the Eurasian continent. These Cro-Magnons represent a quantum leap in evolution; we were the first to develop the creative imagination, as seen in cave art in the south of France and Spain from about 30 millennia ago. We were the first to create sculptured ivory and stone, and our weapons and other technologies underwent a corresponding step-change in sophistication. Cro-Magnons created the Aurignacian culture, which later developed into the Megalithic civilization of the western Eurasian seaboard. Whether Cro-Magnons owe their superior intelligence to intermixing with humans already living in that area (i.e. Neanderthals) has yet to be conclusively determined.
Take a look at a map of Eurasia, bearing in mind that humans of the time were essentially coastal creatures. You don’t have to accept the whole of the Aquatic Ape theory, although it’s increasingly scientifically plausible, in order to understand the advantages for our ancestors of living by the sea. What you see in Europe is a land with lots of coast-lines, islands, peninsulas sticking into the ocean, and easy access to the lush interior (i.e. the north European plain) via broad, well-drained rivers (even broader at the end of the last Ice Age). These conditions were ideal for the evolution of our early ancestors, unlike the deserts, mountains and scrubland that separate western Eurasia from Africa and eastern Eurasia. The only other part of the Eurasian land-mass with comparably favourable conditions for humans is the great northern plain of China with access to the coast via huge rivers flowing east and south-east to the Pacific. Guess what – that’s exactly where the Oriental/ Mongol race of humans evolved, and later where we find the very first evidence of Chinese civilization.
As ice retreated from Europe 10,000 years ago, these former-Cro-Magnons from France and Spain spread northward and eastward as far as Russia, Ukraine, Scandinavia etc.. They colonized and exploited the banks of the Rhine, Danube, Dnepr, Don and Volga so successfully that waves of population in turn went back to the western coasts, unifying the Aurignacian culture again; the process has been going on ever since and evidence of Mesolithic and Neolithic trade right across the continent of Europe is prolific. People living in Russia were a part of this western Eurasian diffusionist evolution, people who later the Greeks and Romans knew as Scythians and Slavs. It was these people (“Cardial” civilization) who developed farming, urban life and writing in Viols-le-Fort, Languedoc, France and surrounding regions, including Malta, from around 10,000 years ago. Many of these earliest costal towns were subsequently inundated as sea-levels rose dramatically at the end of the last Ice Age. Later, these same people developed and recorded their pantheons, social structure, weltanschauung, which were closely-related, if not the same, and which was later classified as Indo-European, or Aryan.

Of course, other parts of the world saw different types of human emerge: the previously-mentioned Oriental Mongols, and (of particular relevance to later European history) the Semites in Arabia and Africa. An argument can be made for saying Semites might not just be a separate civilization, but a separate species of humanity with their own Neanderthal or non-Sapiens-Sapiens antecedents.

There never was an Aryan invasion of Europe. We have always been here, at least since Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Cro-Magnons). Genetic tests of skeletons 10,000 years old from Cheddar Gorge, England, show contemporary inhabitants to be descendants. “Proto-Europeans” were as Aryan as you or me. For more about this, see Colin Renfrew’s LANGUAGE AND HISTORY. All we’ve had in Europe is continual development for c30-40,000 years: Perigordian, Aurignacian, Solutrean, Magdalenian, Azilian (marking the end of the last ice age), Cardial, (start of Neolithic Age: farming, domestication), Mesolithic, Neolithic (Carnac, Orkneys, Malta, Iberia, Stonehenge etc.) and “Aryan” when Europeans started to record their myths etc., in the Bronze/ Heroic Age. Later, Aryans developed philosophy, literature, mathematics, music, art, science and technology to further express the creative imagination of the race.

Aryan is best thought of as a level of consciousness – the level of consciousness Cro-Magnons had reached when pre-history turned into history, and we started to write. European Heroic Age myths across the continent, such as the Iliad and Eddas, all indicate a common origin. Because all Europeans were descended from Cro-Magons and shared the same language, culture and worldview, then it’s unsurprising that the later tribes of Slavs, Teutons, Italics and Celts should have an “Aryan” language, social and mythological structure.

GOD OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND WRITING IS AN ARYAN GOD

The divine archetype called Odin/ Woden exists in ALL Aryan pantheons, not just in Germanic/ Teutonic mythology. He is Lugus/ Lugh with Celts, Mercury/ Hermes with Italics/Latins/Greeks, Volos with the Slavs (Orthodoxized as St. Nicholas), Velinas/ Patollus with the Balts etc. For more, read Georges Dumezil or any Indo-Europeanist since Dumezil.

LOKI

Presently, Loki is bound to a rock, struggling against the dripping venom of a poisonous snake, but the day he is free is Ragnarok, Gotterdammerung when Asgard and Midgard are destroyed and rise anew. Loki represents the dynamic of evolution, and He is a catalyst, related to Prometheus and Faust in his relationship to mankind.
On another matter. As you well know, the West is increasingly illegalizing freedom of thought and speech. Tony Blair’s Nu Labor introduced a bill into Parliament yesterday which would outlaw freedom of expression against religion (e.g. Judaism, Christianity, Islam). I’ve read that there’s still respect for the idea of freedom of speech in Russia. Do you think that if someone fell foul of our laws, then they would be able to apply for political asylum in Russia?! How successful do you think that application would be? Don’t you think it’s hugely ironic, after all those old black&white Cold-War spy movies, that it’s the West that has a drab, stupefied, cowered population?

Delenda est Carthago!

>Technically, you are right : Semites (Jews, Arabs and Turks) are White >because parts of the Anatolian, Touranian, South-Oriental and/or >Indo-Afghan subspecies. Together with the Ainu subspecie, they represent >what we could call the Asia-White races (M89, M201, M69, M20, M9, M172 and >M170 ADN genetic markers). Then, you have the Nordic, East-European, >Dinaric, Alpine and Mediterranean) Euro-White subspecies (M45, LLY22, M173, >M17 and M343 ADN genetic markers). But to say that White Jews or Arabs are >the same than White Latins or Scandinavians would be as preposterous as >saying that Black Bushmen (Khoisan subspecie) are the same than Black Nubas >(Black subspecie).

Ave Constantin!

Saw your photo on the Athenaeum site – very dashing! I can’t read Russian but the title is promising.
I noticed that RevDevalez on the New Right newsgroup has already responded to your ARYANS: KILLERS DURING SUNSET essay pointing out that the people you (and Marija Gimbutas, Ralph Metzner etc. – you’re in good company) keep endearingly referring to as “indigenous Europeans” or “Old Europeans” were the same people as the Aryans.
I concur with RevDevalez. All the most recent genetic and archeological evidence that I’ve read suggests that the southern Russian steppes were initially colonized from the west. Indeed, this is the only conclusion compatible with theories about the end of the last Ice Age, the retreat of the glaciers and our costal “aquatic ape” origins. Because of the dramatically different environment, early European farmers were forced to adapt to a more nomadic existence in the vast, empty plains. This may account for some of the cultural constants that we have come to associate with an Aryan worldview; for example, the importance of horses. It may even have contributed to the Aryan, Faustian spirit of space, limitlessness and infinity, qualities it shares with the American West frontier of the Nineteenth Century.

Some of these inherent traits of Europeans may have found first expression and manifestation on the open grasslands north and east of the Black Sea, but that makes them no less European for that. As I said in my ARYAN ORIGINS essay, Aryan is a name given to a certain cultural pattern that emerged in the Bronze Age, significantly developed by Europeans (descendents of Cro-Magnon cave-painters of southern France and Iberia) in southern Russia.
“It is possible that once the new pastoralist economy of the steppes was established, the arable/ steppe boundary may have shifted some way westward. What may have been in reality an evolution from mixed farming to pastoralism in that area could thus appear in the archaeological record as a westward movement. Nor need one doubt that several of the characteristics of steppe culture which they developed were indeed taken up in neighbouring lands to the west. These ‘Kurgan’ influences may in some cases have involved some movement of people. In others they may simply reflect the adoption of some practices derived from the steppes by the populations on their western margins. At a detailed level there is much to be done in following up these ideas, but from the standpoint of Europe as a whole, it is difficult to believe that there was any significant and sustained movement of population from eastern to central Europe at this time, around 3500 to 3000bc. This is not the solution to the Indo-European problem, although it might be relevant to it.” – Colin Renfrew, Archaeology & Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins.
These cultural innovations spread back westward into central and western Europe, but as Colin Renfrew points out, there need never have been an invasion (unlike the Aryan invasion of India, which was an incursion into a pre-existing civilization racially and culturally unrelated).

I think a good analogy would be with the spread of railroads across Europe.

An archaeologist in the far future, assuming he had no written record, would discover the earliest railroads, from the 1830s, located in England only. He would see that by the 1870s the whole continent was covered in a tight network of railroads, with single threads stretching into Asia and Africa. Along the European railroads, he might find some old steam engines, with writing like “Richard Garrett & Sons” or “Duncan & Grant – Belgium” stamped on the side. At railway termini across Europe he would see stone buildings with “Bristol Hotel” just legible above their ruined doorways. He might even come across the Thyssen family mausoleum, compare the DNA with that of Robert Stephenson in Westminster Abbey, and conclude that they were the same race! Our future archaeologist might reasonably conclude that during the Nineteenth Century, England successfully conquered the whole continent!
But railways spread quickly in Europe because Europeans were ready for railways. If George Stephenson hadn’t developed the locomotive, then someone else in England, or northwest Europe, would have done within the following decade. “None of these developments showed any signs of a ‘forced’ growth imposed from outside. On the contrary, they were building on the foundation of centuries of slow accumulation of capital, technical skills, capitalistic attitudes and wage labour.” – European Economic Integration, Sidney Pollard.

The same is true, I believe, with the Aryan hypothesis; it should be considered as a continent-wide cultural shift, a crystallization of mythology, politics, technics and aesthetics. It is like the industrial and scientific revolutions, or the Renaissance, or Classical civilization itself, only more significant and profound because it is the very first pan-European cultural development that we know about in some detail. The fact is that people have been moving about, invading each other, within Europe, for millennia, but that movement makes no difference to our overall genetic make-up as Aryan Europeans.

Best wishes,
Alisdair
Delenda est Carthago!

Islam and Free Speech

2006-03-28T05:03:00.000-08:00

Below is an open letter that I sent to the gay press at the end of 2005;the only people to publish it to date are Third Way:

I’m mighty concerned about Tony Blair and Nu Labour’s proposed religious hate laws. I think it’s relevant to all European homosexuals because human rights pro-multi-cultural lawyers will try to enact similar legislation across the continent. I’m no lawyer, so perhaps someone who knows could answer the following questions:

Islam advocates execution for practicing homosexuals. Will it be illegal for me to say that, to me, Islam is a “hateful” religion (that is, a religion full of hate, or that excites hatred, directed against homosexuals)? Will I be able to say that Muslims, because they follow a religion that preaches hatred of homosexuals, are themselves “hateful” (that is, full of hate directed against homosexuals)?

Could a Muslim argue that the killing of homosexuals is not an act of hatred but simply the dispassionate execution of the will of Allah, maybe even an act of love? Something like the “love the sinner, hate the sin” line we get from fundie Christians pontificating about homosexuality. So that even if he wants to kill me, he still doesn’t hate me.

Alternatively, less ambiguously and more directly, will it be illegal for me to say that I hate Islam because it is monotheistic, and to me monotheism is a philosophical anathema, the antithesis of all that’s best in European culture? Or because of Islam’s misogyny? By implication, could I say the same thing about individual adult Muslims since religion, unlike race, is a matter of volition? So will it be illegal for me to state that I hate Muslims because they are monotheistic, or misogynistic, or because they have as adults deliberately abandoned their faculties of reasoning in order to submit to Allah?

In concurrence with Western philosophy since Plato and Aristotle, I accept that the ability to reason is a quality that distinguishes man from animals. To abandon reason is to make man more bestial, which to my mind is hateful.

In short, will I be able to say that I hate Islam because Islam hates me? Not just because of my homosexuality, but because I am a Euro-pagan to boot; an infidel and idolater in their rather emotive language, which gives them even more reason to want me dead. Can I say what I think of them, and why?

Finally, if Blair’s legislation is passed, would this posting be illegal? The Home Office guidance notes on the new bill contains the following. “It only applies to words, behaviour, written material, recordings or programmes that are threatening, abusive or insulting. Second, the material must be intended to, or likely to, stir up racial or religious hatred. Hatred is a strong term and the offences will not encompass material that just stirs up ridicule or prejudice or causes offence. Further, what must be stirred up is hatred of a group of persons defined by their religious beliefs and not hatred of the religion itself. Therefore, legitimate discussion, criticism, or expressions of antipathy or dislike of particular religions or their adherents will not be caught by the offence”.

If I receive no response, then I will assume all the activists on this list are too busy shoring-up the crumbling bastions of multi-culturalism or otherwise subverting European civilization, to answer some urgent, authentic questions from an authentic European.

Pit of Evil in the Middle East

2006-03-28T04:58:00.000-08:00

Pit of evil in the middle east.

Is there some kind of malignant consciousness trapped or buried somewhere beneath the deserts where Asia and Africa meet, a warped spirit that not only invades the minds of peoples living locally, and beyond, but can even blight the very physical environment?

To see images from the area - the bleached, rocky scrubland, deserted and ruined Crusader forts, fly-blown refugee camps - is to be reminded of the worst images from the Wasteland of the Arthurian cycle. Where other regions might have a lake of waterfowl and sedge at its heart, this strange vortex has the Dead Sea, the below-sea-level toxic lagoon which periodically vomits globules of black asphalt. The surrounding dirt and air seems to ooze a preternatural evil, vividly evoked in Holman Hunt’s lurid, putrid colouring of ‘The Scapegoat’.

(Cheap oil is one of the Middle East’s “gifts” to the world. Without cheap oil and its imperial and corporate pushers, Western civilization would have learnt to develop without the hazardous privately-owned motor car and its filthy internal combustion engine. Cities in Britain would have developed with far denser populations near their centres who relied exclusively on public transport, encouraging a less individualistic and a more collectivist society. Without cheap oil, research and investment into alternative, sustainable energy generation would have started far sooner).

The Middle East is home to the world’s three great monotheistic religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Monotheistic, universalist, totalitarian, messianic, closed systems of thought that promote uncritical faith in sexist and homophobic holy scripture. The three Abrahamic religions, their regulations against free enquiry, free thought and rationality represent the opposite to Aryan European values.

Many great European thinkers including Hegel, Toynbee and Evola have linked the inception of monotheistic thinking to the decay of the Semitic universal state. All agree that the area is littered with previous (failed) cycles of civilization. Hegel in 1830: “The East itself, when by degrees enthusiasm had vanished, sunk into the grossest vice. The most hideous passions became dominant, and as sensual enjoyment was sanctioned in the first form which Mahometan doctrine assumed, and was exhibited as a reward for the faithful in Paradise, it took the place of fanaticism. At present, driven back into its Asiatic and African quarters, and tolerated only in one corner of Europe through the jealousy of Christian powers, Islam has long vanished from the stage of history at large, and has retreated into Oriental ease and repose”.

Julius Evola: “The Diaspora, or the scattering of the Jewish People, corresponded to the by-products of the spiritual dissolution of a cycle that did not have a ‘heroic’ restoration and in which some sort of inner fracture promoted processes of an antitraditional character. There are ancient traditions according to which Typhon, a demon opposed to the solar God, was father of the Hebrews; various Gnostic authors considered the Hebrew god as one of Typhon’s creatures. These are references to a demonic spirit characterized by a constant restlessness, by an obscure contamination, and by a latent revolt of the inferior elements.”

Toynbee, the most liberal, says: “On closer inspection we can also discern what appear to be fossilized relics of similar societies now extinct, namely: one set including the Monophysite Christians of Armenia, Mesopotamia, Egypt and Abyssinia and the Nestorian Christians of Kurdistan and ex-Nestorians in Malabar, as well as the Jews and Parsees…At the present day the Parsees, like the Jews, survive as a mere ‘diaspora’; and the petrified religions which so potently hold the scattered members of the two communities together have lost their message to mankind, and hardened into fossils of the extinct Syriac Society”.

Hellenistic and later Western civilizations have quite separate origins derived from a classic Indo-European worldview, mythology and social structure which were all developed in the Eurasian forests, water meadows and steppes many hundreds of years ago, and many hundreds of miles from the scorched sands of Arabia. The idea of “revealed” truth from a figure such as Moses, Jesus Christ or Mohammed is quite alien to the Aryan mind with its need for logic and an aesthetic which valued above all truth, the real world, as sublime.

From the Middle East monotheism arose like a dark cloud first to dim the brilliance of the pagan Roman empire with morbid Christianity, and later to obscure the remaining Hellenistic outposts and Persian Empire with bloodthirsty Islam. Their intolerant, irrational dogmas caused the death of untold millions over the centuries. For the first time Europeans were infected with an evangelical zeal to conquer the rest of the world for Jesus Christ. Europe’s first overseas colony, bloodily won in the early Crusades, was Frankish Outremer with its capital at Jerusalem. When the Crusader kingdom fell, Europe instead looked westward, resulting in the conversion to Catholicism of the Aztecs and Incas and the genocide by Puritans of the Indians of the North American plains. Similarly, Arabs were inspired by the monotheism of Mohammed to unite and conquer from Spain to south east Asia.

The land between the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf has continually been soaked in blood, a cockpit for colliding empires, a pattern that continues into the present in a crescent from Gaza to Basra. The first battle of Megiddo, the plain north of Jerusalem designated in the ‘Apocalypse of John’ as Armageddon, the site of the ultimate battle of good versus evil, took place in 1482bce, when Pharaoh Tuthmosis III crushed the rebellion of the king of Qadesh and his Syrio-Hittite-Canaanite allies. According to David Hatcher Childress “And so ended the first battle of Armageddon, a decisive battle between Egypt in the west and the Syrian-Lebanese foes of the Hittite Confederacy. So important was this battle in ancient times that it was well-remembered by all the people of the ancient Middle East, and the fall of the fortress of Megiddo was a turning point in the history of the region”. A second battle of Megiddo in 609bce resulted in the defeat and death of King Josiah of Judah by Pharaoh Necho II, and a third, in 1918 when General E.H. Allenby defeated the Turks, led to the fracturing and re-assembling the whole of western Asia along lines more favourable to the Western plutocracies.

The region’s eternal dirge of disillusion, decay and death now tolls around the planet. Despite decades of effort, the religious, ethnic and spiritual crisis has become more and more desperate. The Israeli nuclear facility at Dimona is vulnerable to bombardment from Syria, once Russia completes the sale of its Iskander missile system to Damascus. Dimona is in the Negev desert, not far from the Dead Sea, and not far from the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah whose fiery destruction is so gleefully recounted in the Old Testament.

Viewed from Northwestern Europe, the Middle East lies in a particularly inauspicious direction. North in traditional Aryan lore is the home of the Polar Gods, of Asgard, the ever-spinning fort of Caer Arianrhod and Mount Meru the Mountain of Heaven. West is associated with the Vanir gods of fertility, success, oceanic imagination and the limitless horizon of beyond. But Southeast is where some of the most destructive forces in the cosmos meet: Surtr, the fateful fire giant from the burning southern realm of Muspellheim with the Jotuns, the foes of the gods, from beyond Ironwood to the east.

Persistent local tradition abounds with stories of djinn, demon pits and entrances to Hell. One such gateway is at the bottom of a stone staircase that leads from King David’s tomb on Mount Zion. Another pit is under the stone bearing Mohammed’s footprint in the Dome of the Rock on Temple Mount. This is the same rock upon which Abraham was meant to sacrifice Isaac, and upon which the Ark of the Covenant was placed in Solomon’s original Temple. It is through the Knights Templar, masons and freemasons and others that symbols and patterns from the first temple of Solomon made their way into modern international finance.

H.P. Lovecraft was sensitive to emanations from the desert. Robert Turner says in The R’lyeh Text, “In his story The Nameless City [Weird Tales, November 1921] Lovecraft’s traveller discovers a hidden valley in the sands of the Arabian desert, and within the valley a ruined city ‘built before history began’. The mummified remains of a half-reptilian race reveal the city to be of pre-human origin and ancient frescoes indicate the existence of a further city concealed within a subterranean cavern beneath the ruins. Lin Carter points out that The Nameless City is now held to be the first of the stories that compromise the Cthulhu Mythos, and that it is here that we first learn of Abdul Alhazred [author of the Necronomicon, the leitmotiv of Lovecraft’s Mythos]. In several of the Mythos tales the mad Arab poet Alhazred is said to have visited the long vanished city of Irem; the City of Pillars mentioned in the Koran. The location, and even the definite existence of Irem has been a subject of debate amongst archaeologists for decades, but recently new evidence has come to light which almost certainly establishes the factual truth behind the legend. During February 1992 a newspaper article in The Independent [25.02.92] revealed that Nasa satellite photographs showed an ancient road running across a barren “empty quarter” of Arabia, which after much research led a team of American archaeologists to the site believed to be the ancient city of the Bedouins called Ubar, which T.E. Lawrence described as ‘the Atlantis of the Sands’. According to Bedouin folklore Ubar had been buried in the desert for over 1,500 years since its destruction. The city existed over 4000 bce and is now thought to lie beneath the town of Shis’r north-west of Salalah in Oman”. Sir Ranulph Fiennes certainly believed from the evidence that Irem/ Ubar, which uncannily resembles the immensely old, wind-swept cities of the Gobi desert described in William Burroughs’ Cities of the Red Night, to be one and the same.

It seems irrational to suggest that a malignant psychic force, independent of any human agency, could exist under the sands of the Middle East, a force that can wreak havoc throughout the region and across the world. But logical and systematic reasoning is itself a product of Aristotle and the philosophes of the Enlightenment, that is, a product of Aryan, Western, European civilization. Rationality does not encompass all of Aryan civilization, neither should we jump to quick conclusions about parts of the world that we can never truly understand in the same way as can its native inhabitants of thousands of years. Also, the Middle East, amongst other things, has been home to some of the most implacable foes of Aryan civilization. Europe is caught in a pincer movement stretching from Spain to the Caucasus and across over a thousand years in time, and now the internal security of Europe has never been more vulnerable. If there is such a thing as a psychic equivalent of nuclear waste, radiating corruption across the desert, there is no good reason why the locals should ever become fully conscious of it, let alone tell us in the West about it.

Until we can decide what it is exactly we are up against, it would be sensible to isolate Western civilization from the Middle East and throw a cordon sanitaire over the area. Naturally this would mean a complete reappraisal of Western energy needs as importing cheap oil from Arabia would no longer be an option. Instead, Europe could investigate oil supplies from Russia and the Caucasus, with the long-term necessary goal of European autarky. As for the Middle East itself, any future political re-structuring will be up to the people in the area. Perhaps we will be lucky enough to see the re-establishment of a Caliphate that is able to accommodate Jews and non-Muslims.

A final necessary step for Europe is to remove all Middle Eastern influences from Aryan civilization; a relatively easy task since monotheism, messianism etc are not core Western values but rather excresences on the Aryan body politic.

References
Philosophy of History. Georg W.F. Hegel (Dover, New York, 1956)
Study of History Abridgement of Volumes I-IV. Arnold J. Toynbee (Royal Institute of International Affairs/ OUP, London 1946)
Revolt Against the Modern World. Julius Evola (Inner Traditions, Vermont, 1995)
A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Armageddon. David Hatcher Childress (Adventures Unlimited, Kempton Illinois 2001)
The R’lyeh Text. Robert Turner (Skoob, London, 1995)

Pagan Aryan Magic

2006-03-28T04:55:00.000-08:00

MAGIC

Magic is ur-technology using will, combined with structured ritual, creative imagination and higher consciousness. Once in this state of higher consciousness, the physical universe, Midgard, becomes malleable to will.

Will

This process is described in Germanic cosmogony (origins of the universe) with the three divine brothers Wotan, Vili and Ve, who are the first three gods and creators of mankind and the world (from Wer-ald, meaning “age of man” – another word for Midgard). These three brothers encapsulate the act of creation of whatever kind, by man as well as gods.

Wotan (aka Woden/ Odin) literally means to be ecstatic; as described by Adam of Bremen in the eleventh century, “Wodan id est furor” [Woden, that is to say fury]. The meaning of Wili is unchanged in most Teutonic languages (Will); while Ve means “apartness” – separate from the everyday world – with the implication of “sacredness”. Later, the Vikings would use the same word for their triangular-shaped sacred enclosures.

Altered Consciousness – WODANAZ

From clues contained in this blue-print, MANNERBUND and the Arktion Federation have devised rituals to progress the sacred destiny of Homo Europeanus. The quickest and easiest route to a state of higher consciousness is via sex and drugs. Of course, there are other methods e.g.: extreme mortification through asceticism, intense and prolonged meditation, chanting and shamanic drumming. But most of these methods are alien to modern (and indeed ancient) Europeans, whereas sex and drugs, above all alcohol, are like old friends – particularly for gay men on the scene.

Entheogens (hallucinogenic drugs) traditionally used by our ancestors include the fly agaric mushroom, ergot (base for LSD), hemp and the solanaceae containing atropine, such as mandrake, henbane, thornapple and deadly nightshade. Tne love affair between alcohol and the European imagination continues, as strong as ever, from Mother Russia to the Whisky Galore pubs of the Atlantic coast. As Bowie’s Thomas Newton character replies at the end of MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH when questioned about his drinking, “I see things”.

Soma

Aryan mythology abounds in references to magical, consciousness-altering drugs. In Germanic mythology it is called Odroerir (literally “Wonder-raiser” in Old Norse): the mead of poetic inspiration. This mead, brewed from the blood of Kvasir (the wisest of all creatures), was later stolen by Odin, taking the form of an eagle, from the Giants. Returning to Asgard with his booty, Odin allows a few drops of the precious liquid to fall to Earth to provide inspiration for his children on Midgard.

This myth bears a more-than-passing resemblance to the Greek tale of Zeus and Ganymede, which fuses the themes of drugs and homosexuality.

The Trojan prince Ganymede (from whom the Romans got the word “catamite”) is abducted by Zeus in the form of an eagle to become his loves and, most significantly, cup-bearer – the cup containing the magical drink ambrosia. Celts have their cauldron of regeneration, which with the coming of Xianity was transformed into the Holy Grail. But perhaps the most famous of these mythical psychedelic drug-drinks (thanks to Aldous Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD) is Soma.

In the earliest surviving Aryan writings, the RIG VEDA (1500bce), Soma is a god and also a drink-sacrifice, and once again it is an eagle that brings Soma to the warrior god Indra. Sadly, the recipe for Soma is now lost.

Sleipner

Most modern homosexual men are oblivious to the power of sexual energy; they dissipate it in romantic love (not so bad) or, worse, empty hedonistic individualism – an extension of capitalist consumerism into the most basic of drives (“the meat market”). They are like fish swimming in a reservoir behind a hydro-electric dam, completely unaware of the immense power being generated around them. MANNERBUND will expand consciousness to give these men a higher perspective and transform their fish-consciousness into that of an eagle soaring above.

That sexual activity alters consciousness can be taken as given: Aleister Crowley and Austin Osman Spare are two of the most significant magicians of the modern era to recognize this, and based their magical philosophies on concentration of will at the moment of climax.

Climax launches the willed-intention into the Web of Wyrd, usually with the use of sigils or, as in the case with MANNERBUND, runes. Homosexual sex is of a different order from straight sex; on a mundane level it is never associated with re-production. On a more profound level it dispenses with mundane reality (male/ female). Unlike dualistic sex which is domestic, tame and aims at harmony through the balanced polarities of male and female, homosexual sex multiplies “sameness”, “oneness” and consequently is “wild”, singular, non-dual, more concentrated and therefore more powerful.

Our Germanic forebears were fully aware of the special power of same-sex magical orgasm. Loki, the blood-brother of Odin who represents the not-always-benevolent forces of cultural evolution and the five percent creative minority and culture-bearers of any civilization, is the most ambivalent of all mythological figures, a trickster like Hermes/ Mercury.

As a result of what is effectively a same-sex encounter, Loki produces Sleipnir, Odin’s sky-riding eight-legged horse. In the YNGALINGA SAGA, Odin himself is accused of being Ergi (usually interpreted as taking a passive role in homosexual sex) because of his use of Seidr, a type of intuitive magic usually practiced by women. Odin’s nick-name Jalkr – gelding – is also telling.

Sacred Ritual – VE

A magical intention is only effectively performed when the context is correct: right time, right people, right frame of mind, correct correspondences. This structure separates a magical act from a mundane act and makes it sacred (Ve). MANNERBUND believes that the best of all frameworks for rituals to renew and advance Western civilization are those based on our earliest archetypes and mythologies and which are embedded in our racial sub-conscious.

Uniquely Aryan archetypes include Polar Mythology, the Promethean spirit, the Faustian spirit, the ancient mystery of the Swastika, the Black Sun and the MANNERBUND. It is those archetypes that acted as a spur to the creation of Aryan civilization in the first place; to use any other system would be counter-productive and profoundly destructive.

Futurist Spectrum: Infrared to Ultraviolet

2006-03-28T04:36:00.000-08:00

Futurist Spectrum
Alisdair_Clarke@hotmail.com

New Right and Traditionalist speculations on futurism can be imagined as a spectrum, with the realists at the infra-red end and romantics and poets verging toward ultra-violet. A few, most notably the Italian Futurist Filippo Marinetti, fought not to be restricted to a certain point on that continuum; the man who could anticipate and wax lyrical about Twenty-First Century alternative technology, “the energy of distant winds and rebellious seas, transformed into millions of kilowatts by the genius of man, would be distributed everywhere…regulated by the the keyboards vibrating under the fingers of technicians” practising “the religion of extrinsic will and daily heroism” was the same man to head a campaign against Italians eating spaghetti in the early 1930s.

Germans took note of that initial bright blue burst of Futurism from Italy, but their futurism was to be of a more serious and sombre variety. Oswald Spengler stressed the inevitability of technology for Western civilization as a part of our Faustian spirit and destiny. Junger and Niekisch were more celebratory of the efficiency, dynamism and productive power of modern technology, and the possibilities it could open up for the individual and society. Meanwhile in practical, pragmatic England, at the red, realist end of the spectrum, Alexander Raven Thomson of the British Union of Fascists proposed a model for an automated civilization in part inspired by insect-hives.

After the War, while consumer capitalism was refining cybernetics, Traditionalists and Conservative Revolutionaries unsurprisingly stuck to the Romantic and metaphysical, ultra-violet side of the spectrum. James Madole was sufficiently distanced, geographically at least, from the catastrophe in Europe to influence the National Renaissance Party in the United States. Madole and his futurist ideas were themselves influenced by Theosophy and other occult sources. Later, in Europe and America, again in the ultra-violet, metaphysical realms, science-fiction writers like Michael X. Barton, Wilhelm Landig, Jean Parvulesco, Ernst Zundel and W.A. Harbinson developed a Nazi/ UFO/ Survival mythology, which extended to the Aryan Aldebaran thesis of Austrian science fiction in the 1990s. For a book at the outer limits of ultra-violet, try “The Black Sun: Montauk’s Nazi-Tibetan Connection” by Peter Noon. Philip K. Dick’s “The Man in the High Castle” is a (slightly) more mainstream science fiction novel about an Axis victory in World War Two, which contains some interesting ideas. Reflections of this UFO/ survival mythology can be caught in mainstream popular culture, such as in “The X-Files Movie” which depicts the aesthetic perfection of silver spacecraft gliding over the glittering purity of Antarctic glaciers and ice-mountains.

Just as Marinetti’s Futurism marked the start of the Twentieth Century, so the brilliant, emerald-green flash of Guillaume Faye’s Archeo-Futurism marked its end. Faye emerged from GRECE, which had always been pro-technology. “In the 20th century appeared the possibility for men to transform and dominate themselves, and to go much farther than simply adapting to their surroundings in forging their own environment; the prospect of biology, electronics, genetic engineering, telematics, astrophysics and space research announce the coming of the ‘third man’.”- GRECE statement.

Guillaume Faye and GRECE were of revolutionary significance because they were the first to systematically merge George Dumezil’s recent discoveries of Aryan tri-partite structuralism with contemporary politics and technology, to be made manifest in the pagan Imperium.

My own belief is that the idea of synthesis/ the Hegelian dialectic/ resolution of opposites into a singularity is at the heart of Aryan mythology and cosmogenesis. It is represented most often as the (North) Pole; Hlidskalf – Odin’s throne – above Asgard in the Eddas. I contend that Asgard/ Olympus/ Caer Arianrhod is a blueprint for the future.

Recent Futurisms, apart from Archeo-Futurism, include Constantin von Hoffmeister’s National Futurism www.newnation.com/Hoffmeister/index, the Surreal Futurism of Ars Vindex www.rosenoir.org/articles/surreal.php, and my own Aryan Futurism. As an Anglo, I’m typically at the redder end of the spectrum, concerned with nuts & bolts and organizing practicalities like the environment and economy. Just as Le Corbusier imagined homes as “machines for living” in an ideal (fascist) civilization, so I can imagine Paolo Soleri’s Arcologies (massive hermetically-sealed self-sufficient cities) as “machines for conquest”. Not for mundane territorial expansion, but for the ultimate conquest of Space and Time.

Futurism and Progress

In his “Age of Ideologies” (1982) Karl Dietrich Bracher argues that since the Enlightenment, two opposing ideas of progress have fought it out in Europe: progress as freedom versus progress as power. Generally, liberals and leftists supported the idea of progress as freedom, while Hegel and thinkers on the right took the opposite view.

Freedom is a tricky, ambiguous word. A man can be free “from” the material world, i.e. live as an ascetic hermit, or a Buddhist who has renounced desire. Alternatively, a man can be free “to” the material world, meaning he has access to everything material, but everything material has access – purchase – to the man. The man becomes a free offerer, and a free offer, in the supermarket of life.

Power has no such ambiguity; a man can only have power “over” the material world. One aspect of power is the ability to manipulate matter in accordance with will, which is one of the essential components of the Faustian spirit and the basis of Futurism.

Finally, some of the liberal and universalist futurists still occasionally have some useful ideas, despite their mistaking our particular European industrial civilization for a universal civilization. H.G. Wells (especially in “Shape of Things to Come”), Arthur C. Clarke and the Catholic theologian Teilhard de Chardin all have interesting ideas concerning evolution, amongst other things, which can be adapted to New Right metapolitics.